Russell´s Early Type Theory and the Paradox of Propositions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2001 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/17758 |
Resumo: | The paradox of propositiOns, presented in Appenclix B of Russell's The Principies of Mathernatics (1903), is usually taken as Russell's principal motive, at the time, for moving from a simple to a ramified theory of types. I argue that this view is mistaken. A closer study of Russell's correspondence with Frege reveals that Russell carne to adopt a very different resolution of the paradox, calling into question not the simplicity of his early type theory but the simplicity of his early theory of propositions. |
id |
UFSC-5_edcbecc5f6be942fddc254d8ee7020f8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/17758 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Russell´s Early Type Theory and the Paradox of PropositionsThe paradox of propositiOns, presented in Appenclix B of Russell's The Principies of Mathernatics (1903), is usually taken as Russell's principal motive, at the time, for moving from a simple to a ramified theory of types. I argue that this view is mistaken. A closer study of Russell's correspondence with Frege reveals that Russell carne to adopt a very different resolution of the paradox, calling into question not the simplicity of his early type theory but the simplicity of his early theory of propositions.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2001-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1775810.5007/%xPrincipia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 5 No. 1-2 (2001); 19-42Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 5 Núm. 1-2 (2001); 19-42Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 5 n. 1-2 (2001); 19-421808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/17758/16344Copyright (c) 2021 André Fuhrmannhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFuhrmann, André2016-01-02T12:18:13Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/17758Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2016-01-02T12:18:13Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Russell´s Early Type Theory and the Paradox of Propositions |
title |
Russell´s Early Type Theory and the Paradox of Propositions |
spellingShingle |
Russell´s Early Type Theory and the Paradox of Propositions Fuhrmann, André |
title_short |
Russell´s Early Type Theory and the Paradox of Propositions |
title_full |
Russell´s Early Type Theory and the Paradox of Propositions |
title_fullStr |
Russell´s Early Type Theory and the Paradox of Propositions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Russell´s Early Type Theory and the Paradox of Propositions |
title_sort |
Russell´s Early Type Theory and the Paradox of Propositions |
author |
Fuhrmann, André |
author_facet |
Fuhrmann, André |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fuhrmann, André |
description |
The paradox of propositiOns, presented in Appenclix B of Russell's The Principies of Mathernatics (1903), is usually taken as Russell's principal motive, at the time, for moving from a simple to a ramified theory of types. I argue that this view is mistaken. A closer study of Russell's correspondence with Frege reveals that Russell carne to adopt a very different resolution of the paradox, calling into question not the simplicity of his early type theory but the simplicity of his early theory of propositions. |
publishDate |
2001 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2001-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/17758 10.5007/%x |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/17758 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/%x |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/17758/16344 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 André Fuhrmann http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 André Fuhrmann http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 5 No. 1-2 (2001); 19-42 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 5 Núm. 1-2 (2001); 19-42 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 5 n. 1-2 (2001); 19-42 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435110305562624 |