Richard Burt. Licensed by Authority: Ben Jonson and the Discourse of Censorship.Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1998 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ilha do Desterro |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/8364 |
Resumo: | Richard Burt‘s book adds another voice to recent studies of censorship in the Renaissance, the most substantial of which belong to Annabel Patterson, Leeds Barroll, and Philip Finkelpearl. Burt‘s argument is that previous studies have tended to regard censorship “in monolithic, narrow terms, defining it exclusively as a negative exercise of power centered in the court”. He describes the work of Annabel Patterson and Philip Finkelpearl as “ahistorical”, mainly because it frames the discussion of early modern censorship in terms of free speech vs. censorship — authors attempting, in one way or another, to speak freely and dodge censorship entirely. This is a way of thinking, Burt claims, which did not occur to early modern English playwrights; rather, for them censorship was a given. |
id |
UFSC-9_7d4a0163205f5dafafb82f9442c312dd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/8364 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-9 |
network_name_str |
Ilha do Desterro |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Richard Burt. Licensed by Authority: Ben Jonson and the Discourse of Censorship.Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993Richard Burt. Licensed by Authority: Ben Jonson and the Discourse of Censorship.Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993Richard Burt‘s book adds another voice to recent studies of censorship in the Renaissance, the most substantial of which belong to Annabel Patterson, Leeds Barroll, and Philip Finkelpearl. Burt‘s argument is that previous studies have tended to regard censorship “in monolithic, narrow terms, defining it exclusively as a negative exercise of power centered in the court”. He describes the work of Annabel Patterson and Philip Finkelpearl as “ahistorical”, mainly because it frames the discussion of early modern censorship in terms of free speech vs. censorship — authors attempting, in one way or another, to speak freely and dodge censorship entirely. This is a way of thinking, Burt claims, which did not occur to early modern English playwrights; rather, for them censorship was a given.Richard Burt‘s book adds another voice to recent studies of censorship in the Renaissance, the most substantial of which belong to Annabel Patterson, Leeds Barroll, and Philip Finkelpearl. Burt‘s argument is that previous studies have tended to regard censorship “in monolithic, narrow terms, defining it exclusively as a negative exercise of power centered in the court”. He describes the work of Annabel Patterson and Philip Finkelpearl as “ahistorical”, mainly because it frames the discussion of early modern censorship in terms of free speech vs. censorship — authors attempting, in one way or another, to speak freely and dodge censorship entirely. This is a way of thinking, Burt claims, which did not occur to early modern English playwrights; rather, for them censorship was a given.UFSC1998-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/8364Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; No. 34 (1998); 113-119Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; n. 34 (1998); 113-1192175-80260101-4846reponame:Ilha do Desterroinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/8364/7738Copyright (c) 1998 Craig Bernthalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBernthal, Craig2022-12-07T11:05:50Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/8364Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterroPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/oaiilha@cce.ufsc.br||corseuil@cce.ufsc.br||ilhadodesterro@gmail.com2175-80260101-4846opendoar:2022-12-07T11:05:50Ilha do Desterro - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Richard Burt. Licensed by Authority: Ben Jonson and the Discourse of Censorship.Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993 Richard Burt. Licensed by Authority: Ben Jonson and the Discourse of Censorship.Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993 |
title |
Richard Burt. Licensed by Authority: Ben Jonson and the Discourse of Censorship.Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993 |
spellingShingle |
Richard Burt. Licensed by Authority: Ben Jonson and the Discourse of Censorship.Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993 Bernthal, Craig |
title_short |
Richard Burt. Licensed by Authority: Ben Jonson and the Discourse of Censorship.Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993 |
title_full |
Richard Burt. Licensed by Authority: Ben Jonson and the Discourse of Censorship.Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993 |
title_fullStr |
Richard Burt. Licensed by Authority: Ben Jonson and the Discourse of Censorship.Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Richard Burt. Licensed by Authority: Ben Jonson and the Discourse of Censorship.Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993 |
title_sort |
Richard Burt. Licensed by Authority: Ben Jonson and the Discourse of Censorship.Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993 |
author |
Bernthal, Craig |
author_facet |
Bernthal, Craig |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bernthal, Craig |
description |
Richard Burt‘s book adds another voice to recent studies of censorship in the Renaissance, the most substantial of which belong to Annabel Patterson, Leeds Barroll, and Philip Finkelpearl. Burt‘s argument is that previous studies have tended to regard censorship “in monolithic, narrow terms, defining it exclusively as a negative exercise of power centered in the court”. He describes the work of Annabel Patterson and Philip Finkelpearl as “ahistorical”, mainly because it frames the discussion of early modern censorship in terms of free speech vs. censorship — authors attempting, in one way or another, to speak freely and dodge censorship entirely. This is a way of thinking, Burt claims, which did not occur to early modern English playwrights; rather, for them censorship was a given. |
publishDate |
1998 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1998-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/8364 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/8364 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/8364/7738 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 1998 Craig Bernthal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 1998 Craig Bernthal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; No. 34 (1998); 113-119 Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; n. 34 (1998); 113-119 2175-8026 0101-4846 reponame:Ilha do Desterro instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Ilha do Desterro |
collection |
Ilha do Desterro |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ilha do Desterro - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ilha@cce.ufsc.br||corseuil@cce.ufsc.br||ilhadodesterro@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799875275520999424 |