Characterization of the insertion of occupational therapists in the Brazilian Unified Social Assistance System

• Autor(a) principal: Basso, Ana Carolina de Souza
• Data de Publicação: 2024
• Outros Autores: Homem, Janette dos Santos, Borba, Patrícia Leme de Oliveira
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por; eng
• Título da fonte: Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional
• Texto Completo: https://www.cadernosdeterapiaocupacional.ufscar.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/3605
• topic: Occupational Therapy; Social Assistance; Social Work; Terapia Ocupacional; Assistência Social; Trabalho Social

Introduction: Since 2005, Brazilian cities have been adapting to organize teams and services of the Unified Social Assistance System (SUAS), and since 2011, occupational therapy has been recognized as one of the professions that compose these teams and the management of SUAS. This study addresses how the category has been involved in this policy in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Objective: To map the occupational therapists working at SUAS in this state and outline the characteristics of this inclusion. Methodology: A descriptive, cross-sectional mapping study, using official data from the SUAS Census. Data were analyzed from a descriptive perspective, in dialogue with the National Social Assistance/Welfare Policy, the literature in the field of occupational therapy in social assistance, and under the framework of social occupational therapy. Results: In the State of Rio de Janeiro, 142 occupational therapists work at SUAS, which is equivalent to 8.9% of the professionals in this state. This workforce is composed of women (89.4%) aged 41-50 years (34.5%), hired by Civil Society Organizations (93%), under the Consolidation of Labor Laws (CLT) regime (50%), with a weekly workload of 11-20 hours (40.9%), mainly inserted in Day Centers (71%), working with people with disabilities and older people. Conclusion: The inclusion of occupational therapists in SUAS of Rio de Janeiro state occurs precariously, with low insertion in this state’s devices. It highlights the need for representative entities of the class to act in this public policy as a promoter of expanding job opportunities/public contests/employment, as well as to invest in debates about team compositions and the recognition of different fields of knowledge.