THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/e64536 |
Resumo: | Our purpose here is to compare the protection against insider trading in Brazil and the European Union law, specifically the way insider trading is sanctioned in these two jurisdictions. We highlight the different compositions between administrative and criminal sanctions found in the two systems and their implications for the fundamental rights and personal rights (in case of Brazil) of those held liable for the practice of insider trading. The possible cumulation of punishments imposed by criminal courts and administrative regulatory bodies raise the question whether there might be a violation of the ne bis in idem principle. The response to that question is different in each system. We will start by briefly taking stock of the genesis and evolution of anti-insider trading regulation in Brazil and in the EU in order to comprehend the different rationales for the prohibition of insider trading in the two jurisdiction, so as to understand the reasons behind their divergencies and convergencies. |
id |
UFSM-17_c1f0d4bcaa842867ffcdff80a6de1d16 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/64536 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-17 |
network_name_str |
Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSISLA SANCIÓN DEL INSIDER TRADING EN BRASIL Y LA UNIÓN EUROPEA Y LA PROTECCIÓN DE DERECHOS: UN ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVOTHE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSISInsider TradingSanctionsNe bis in idemHuman RightsPersonal Rights.Insider TradingSancionesNe bis in idemDerechos humanosDerechos de la personalidad.Insider TradingSançõesNe bis in idemDireitos HumanosDireitos da Personalidade.Our purpose here is to compare the protection against insider trading in Brazil and the European Union law, specifically the way insider trading is sanctioned in these two jurisdictions. We highlight the different compositions between administrative and criminal sanctions found in the two systems and their implications for the fundamental rights and personal rights (in case of Brazil) of those held liable for the practice of insider trading. The possible cumulation of punishments imposed by criminal courts and administrative regulatory bodies raise the question whether there might be a violation of the ne bis in idem principle. The response to that question is different in each system. We will start by briefly taking stock of the genesis and evolution of anti-insider trading regulation in Brazil and in the EU in order to comprehend the different rationales for the prohibition of insider trading in the two jurisdiction, so as to understand the reasons behind their divergencies and convergencies.Nuestro propósito aquí es comparar la protección contra el uso de información privilegiada en Brasil y la ley de la Unión Europea, específicamente la forma en que se sanciona el uso de información privilegiada en estas dos jurisdicciones. Destacamos las diferentes composiciones entre sanciones administrativas y penales encontradas en los dos sistemas y sus implicaciones para los derechos fundamentales y los derechos de la personalidad (en el caso de Brasil) de los responsables por la práctica del uso de información privilegiada. La posible acumulación de sanciones impuestas por los tribunales penales y los órganos reguladores administrativos plantea la cuestión de si podría haber una violación del principio ne bis in idem. La respuesta a esa pregunta es diferente en cada sistema. Comenzaremos revisando brevemente la génesis y evolución de la regulación sobre el uso de información privilegiada en Brasil y en la UE con el fin de comprender las diferentes razones de la prohibición del uso de información privilegiada en ambas jurisdicciones con el fin de comprender las razones detrás de sus diferencias y convergencias.Nosso objetivo aqui é comparar a proteção contra insider trading no Brasil e na União Europeia, especificamente a maneira como o insider trading é sancionado nessas duas jurisdições. Destacaremos as diferentes combinações entre sanções administrativas e criminais encontradas nos dois sistemas e suas implicações para os direitos fundamentais e da personalidade (no caso do Brasil) dos responsáveis pela prática de abuso de informação privilegiada. A possível acumulação de punições impostas por tribunais criminais e órgãos reguladores administrativos levanta a questão de saber se pode haver uma violação do princípio ne bis in idem. A resposta a essa pergunta será diferente em cada sistema. Começaremos fazendo um breve balanço da gênese e da evolução da regulamentação sobre uso de informações privilegiadas no Brasil e na UE, a fim de compreender as diferentes razões para a proibição do insider trading nas duas jurisdições de forma a entender os motivos por trás de suas divergências e convergências.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2021-10-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/e6453610.5902/1981369464536Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM; v. 16 n. 1 (2021)1981-36941981-3694reponame:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMenghttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/e64536/pdfCopyright (c) 2021 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSMinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastro, Alexander deBlachnio-Parzych, Anna2022-10-03T18:59:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/64536Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/revistadireito/PUBhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/revistadireito/oairevistadireito@ufsm.br||advrso@gmail.com1981-36941981-3694opendoar:2022-10-03T18:59:47Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS LA SANCIÓN DEL INSIDER TRADING EN BRASIL Y LA UNIÓN EUROPEA Y LA PROTECCIÓN DE DERECHOS: UN ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title |
THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
spellingShingle |
THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Castro, Alexander de Insider Trading Sanctions Ne bis in idem Human Rights Personal Rights. Insider Trading Sanciones Ne bis in idem Derechos humanos Derechos de la personalidad. Insider Trading Sanções Ne bis in idem Direitos Humanos Direitos da Personalidade. |
title_short |
THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title_full |
THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title_fullStr |
THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title_sort |
THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
author |
Castro, Alexander de |
author_facet |
Castro, Alexander de Blachnio-Parzych, Anna |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Blachnio-Parzych, Anna |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Castro, Alexander de Blachnio-Parzych, Anna |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Insider Trading Sanctions Ne bis in idem Human Rights Personal Rights. Insider Trading Sanciones Ne bis in idem Derechos humanos Derechos de la personalidad. Insider Trading Sanções Ne bis in idem Direitos Humanos Direitos da Personalidade. |
topic |
Insider Trading Sanctions Ne bis in idem Human Rights Personal Rights. Insider Trading Sanciones Ne bis in idem Derechos humanos Derechos de la personalidad. Insider Trading Sanções Ne bis in idem Direitos Humanos Direitos da Personalidade. |
description |
Our purpose here is to compare the protection against insider trading in Brazil and the European Union law, specifically the way insider trading is sanctioned in these two jurisdictions. We highlight the different compositions between administrative and criminal sanctions found in the two systems and their implications for the fundamental rights and personal rights (in case of Brazil) of those held liable for the practice of insider trading. The possible cumulation of punishments imposed by criminal courts and administrative regulatory bodies raise the question whether there might be a violation of the ne bis in idem principle. The response to that question is different in each system. We will start by briefly taking stock of the genesis and evolution of anti-insider trading regulation in Brazil and in the EU in order to comprehend the different rationales for the prohibition of insider trading in the two jurisdiction, so as to understand the reasons behind their divergencies and convergencies. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/e64536 10.5902/1981369464536 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/e64536 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5902/1981369464536 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/e64536/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM; v. 16 n. 1 (2021) 1981-3694 1981-3694 reponame:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM |
collection |
Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadireito@ufsm.br||advrso@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799944061332750336 |