THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Castro, Alexander de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Blachnio-Parzych, Anna
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/e64536
Resumo: Our purpose here is to compare the protection against insider trading in Brazil and the European Union law, specifically the way insider trading is sanctioned in these two jurisdictions. We highlight the different compositions between administrative and criminal sanctions found in the two systems and their implications for the fundamental rights and personal rights (in case of Brazil) of those held liable for the practice of insider trading. The possible cumulation of punishments imposed by criminal courts and administrative regulatory bodies raise the question whether there might be a violation of the ne bis in idem principle. The response to that question is different in each system. We will start by briefly taking stock of the genesis and evolution of anti-insider trading regulation in Brazil and in the EU in order to comprehend the different rationales for the prohibition of insider trading in the two jurisdiction, so as to understand the reasons behind their divergencies and convergencies.
id UFSM-17_c1f0d4bcaa842867ffcdff80a6de1d16
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/64536
network_acronym_str UFSM-17
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSISLA SANCIÓN DEL INSIDER TRADING EN BRASIL Y LA UNIÓN EUROPEA Y LA PROTECCIÓN DE DERECHOS: UN ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVOTHE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSISInsider TradingSanctionsNe bis in idemHuman RightsPersonal Rights.Insider TradingSancionesNe bis in idemDerechos humanosDerechos de la personalidad.Insider TradingSançõesNe bis in idemDireitos HumanosDireitos da Personalidade.Our purpose here is to compare the protection against insider trading in Brazil and the European Union law, specifically the way insider trading is sanctioned in these two jurisdictions. We highlight the different compositions between administrative and criminal sanctions found in the two systems and their implications for the fundamental rights and personal rights (in case of Brazil) of those held liable for the practice of insider trading. The possible cumulation of punishments imposed by criminal courts and administrative regulatory bodies raise the question whether there might be a violation of the ne bis in idem principle. The response to that question is different in each system. We will start by briefly taking stock of the genesis and evolution of anti-insider trading regulation in Brazil and in the EU in order to comprehend the different rationales for the prohibition of insider trading in the two jurisdiction, so as to understand the reasons behind their divergencies and convergencies.Nuestro propósito aquí es comparar la protección contra el uso de información privilegiada en Brasil y la ley de la Unión Europea, específicamente la forma en que se sanciona el uso de información privilegiada en estas dos jurisdicciones. Destacamos las diferentes composiciones entre sanciones administrativas y penales encontradas en los dos sistemas y sus implicaciones para los derechos fundamentales y los derechos de la personalidad (en el caso de Brasil) de los responsables por la práctica del uso de información privilegiada. La posible acumulación de sanciones impuestas por los tribunales penales y los órganos reguladores administrativos plantea la cuestión de si podría haber una violación del principio ne bis in idem. La respuesta a esa pregunta es diferente en cada sistema. Comenzaremos revisando brevemente la génesis y evolución de la regulación sobre el uso de información privilegiada en Brasil y en la UE con el fin de comprender las diferentes razones de la prohibición del uso de información privilegiada en ambas jurisdicciones con el fin de comprender las razones detrás de sus diferencias y convergencias.Nosso objetivo aqui é comparar a proteção contra insider trading no Brasil e na União Europeia, especificamente a maneira como o insider trading é sancionado nessas duas jurisdições. Destacaremos as diferentes combinações entre sanções administrativas e criminais encontradas nos dois sistemas e suas implicações para os direitos fundamentais e da personalidade (no caso do Brasil) dos responsáveis pela prática de abuso de informação privilegiada. A possível acumulação de punições impostas por tribunais criminais e órgãos reguladores administrativos levanta a questão de saber se pode haver uma violação do princípio ne bis in idem. A resposta a essa pergunta será diferente em cada sistema. Começaremos fazendo um breve balanço da gênese e da evolução da regulamentação sobre uso de informações privilegiadas no Brasil e na UE, a fim de compreender as diferentes razões para a proibição do insider trading nas duas jurisdições de forma a entender os motivos por trás de suas divergências e convergências.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2021-10-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/e6453610.5902/1981369464536Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM; v. 16 n. 1 (2021)1981-36941981-3694reponame:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMenghttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/e64536/pdfCopyright (c) 2021 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSMinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastro, Alexander deBlachnio-Parzych, Anna2022-10-03T18:59:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/64536Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/revistadireito/PUBhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/revistadireito/oairevistadireito@ufsm.br||advrso@gmail.com1981-36941981-3694opendoar:2022-10-03T18:59:47Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
LA SANCIÓN DEL INSIDER TRADING EN BRASIL Y LA UNIÓN EUROPEA Y LA PROTECCIÓN DE DERECHOS: UN ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO
THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
spellingShingle THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Castro, Alexander de
Insider Trading
Sanctions
Ne bis in idem
Human Rights
Personal Rights.
Insider Trading
Sanciones
Ne bis in idem
Derechos humanos
Derechos de la personalidad.
Insider Trading
Sanções
Ne bis in idem
Direitos Humanos
Direitos da Personalidade.
title_short THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_full THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_fullStr THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_sort THE SANCTIONING OF INSIDER TRADING IN BRAZIL AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
author Castro, Alexander de
author_facet Castro, Alexander de
Blachnio-Parzych, Anna
author_role author
author2 Blachnio-Parzych, Anna
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Castro, Alexander de
Blachnio-Parzych, Anna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Insider Trading
Sanctions
Ne bis in idem
Human Rights
Personal Rights.
Insider Trading
Sanciones
Ne bis in idem
Derechos humanos
Derechos de la personalidad.
Insider Trading
Sanções
Ne bis in idem
Direitos Humanos
Direitos da Personalidade.
topic Insider Trading
Sanctions
Ne bis in idem
Human Rights
Personal Rights.
Insider Trading
Sanciones
Ne bis in idem
Derechos humanos
Derechos de la personalidad.
Insider Trading
Sanções
Ne bis in idem
Direitos Humanos
Direitos da Personalidade.
description Our purpose here is to compare the protection against insider trading in Brazil and the European Union law, specifically the way insider trading is sanctioned in these two jurisdictions. We highlight the different compositions between administrative and criminal sanctions found in the two systems and their implications for the fundamental rights and personal rights (in case of Brazil) of those held liable for the practice of insider trading. The possible cumulation of punishments imposed by criminal courts and administrative regulatory bodies raise the question whether there might be a violation of the ne bis in idem principle. The response to that question is different in each system. We will start by briefly taking stock of the genesis and evolution of anti-insider trading regulation in Brazil and in the EU in order to comprehend the different rationales for the prohibition of insider trading in the two jurisdiction, so as to understand the reasons behind their divergencies and convergencies.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/e64536
10.5902/1981369464536
url http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/e64536
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1981369464536
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/e64536/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM; v. 16 n. 1 (2021)
1981-3694
1981-3694
reponame:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
collection Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadireito@ufsm.br||advrso@gmail.com
_version_ 1799944061332750336