criminal law and sanctioning administrative law as parts of the brazilian punitive macrossystem and rejection to bis in idem
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/article/view/56629 |
Resumo: | This research deals with the Brazilian punitive macrosystem, covering mainly the sanctioning systems of Criminal Law and Sanctioning Administrative Law, using the deductive method and starting from the premise that these sanctioning spheres are minor parts of this complex macrosystem. The study contemplates an analysis of the existing points of contact between Criminal Law and Sanctioning Administrative Law, under the aspect of a relative dependence or subordination of the latter in relation to the former. The approximation of these punitive microsystems was investigated under certain conditions of similarity highlighted in precedents of the European Court of Human Rights and the Federal Supreme Court, in order to understand the meaning of the mitigated independence between them. After scrutiny of the premise, the following problem situation was identified: What is the degree of binding of the criminal acquittal sentence on the same factual-evidence object of investigation in the area of Sanctioning Administrative Law? As a research hypothesis, using the state of the art on the subject as a parameter, it was found that the dominant doctrine and jurisprudence defend the independence of these punitive systems, however, it was found that there are other aspects of criminal law that may reflect on the field of action of Sanctioning Administrative Law. It was found that a new hermeneutical line emerges in doctrine and jurisprudence that rejects punishment in duplicity (ne bis in idem) under the argument of the mitigated independence of these sanctioning spheres. The present research was developed in this north with the purpose of defining a sanction model based on the mitigated independence of the punitive spheres with hierarchical ascendancy of the Criminal Law. |
id |
PUC_SP-12_77c66cafd1e154317c2a58bc9468c8bc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/56629 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-12 |
network_name_str |
Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
criminal law and sanctioning administrative law as parts of the brazilian punitive macrossystem and rejection to bis in idemEl El derecho penal y el derecho administrativo sancionador como partes del macrosistema punitivo brasileño y el rechazo del BIS IN IDEMO Direito penal e o direito administrativo sancionador como peças do macrossistema punitivo brasileiro e a rejeição ao BIS IN IDEMDireito PenalDireito Administrativo SancionadorIndependênciaMitigadaBis in idemCriminal LawAdministrative Sanctioning LawIndependenceMitigatedBis in idemDerecho penalDerecho Administrativo SancionadorIndependenciamitigadoBis in ídemThis research deals with the Brazilian punitive macrosystem, covering mainly the sanctioning systems of Criminal Law and Sanctioning Administrative Law, using the deductive method and starting from the premise that these sanctioning spheres are minor parts of this complex macrosystem. The study contemplates an analysis of the existing points of contact between Criminal Law and Sanctioning Administrative Law, under the aspect of a relative dependence or subordination of the latter in relation to the former. The approximation of these punitive microsystems was investigated under certain conditions of similarity highlighted in precedents of the European Court of Human Rights and the Federal Supreme Court, in order to understand the meaning of the mitigated independence between them. After scrutiny of the premise, the following problem situation was identified: What is the degree of binding of the criminal acquittal sentence on the same factual-evidence object of investigation in the area of Sanctioning Administrative Law? As a research hypothesis, using the state of the art on the subject as a parameter, it was found that the dominant doctrine and jurisprudence defend the independence of these punitive systems, however, it was found that there are other aspects of criminal law that may reflect on the field of action of Sanctioning Administrative Law. It was found that a new hermeneutical line emerges in doctrine and jurisprudence that rejects punishment in duplicity (ne bis in idem) under the argument of the mitigated independence of these sanctioning spheres. The present research was developed in this north with the purpose of defining a sanction model based on the mitigated independence of the punitive spheres with hierarchical ascendancy of the Criminal Law.Esta investigación aborda el macrosistema punitivo brasileño, abarcando principalmente los sistemas sancionadores de Derecho Penal y Derecho Administrativo Sancionador, utilizando el método deductivo y partiendo de la premisa de que estos ámbitos sancionadores son partes menores de este complejo macrosistema. El estudio contempla un análisis de los puntos de contacto existentes entre el Derecho Penal y el Derecho Administrativo Sancionador, bajo el aspecto de una relativa dependencia o subordinación de este último en relación con el primero. La aproximación de estos microsistemas punitivos fue investigada bajo ciertas condiciones de similitud resaltadas en precedentes del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos y el Tribunal Supremo Federal, con el fin de comprender el significado de la independencia mitigada entre ellos. Luego del escrutinio de la premisa, se identificó la siguiente situación problemática: ¿Cuál es el grado de vinculación de la sentencia absolutoria penal sobre la misma prueba fáctica objeto de investigación en el ámbito del Derecho Administrativo Sancionador? Como hipótesis de investigación, tomando como parámetro el estado del arte en la materia, se encontró que la doctrina y jurisprudencia dominante defienden la independencia de estos sistemas punitivos, sin embargo, se encontró que existen otros aspectos del derecho penal que pueden reflexionar sobre el ámbito de actuación del Derecho Administrativo Sancionador. Se constató que emerge una nueva línea hermenéutica en la doctrina y la jurisprudencia que rechaza el castigo en duplicidad (ne bis in idem) bajo el argumento de la independencia mitigada de estos ámbitos sancionadores. La presente investigación se desarrolló en este norte con el propósito de definir un modelo sancionador basado en la independencia mitigada de los ámbitos punitivos con predominio jerárquico del Derecho Penal.A presente pesquisa trata sobre o macrossistema punitivo brasileiro, abarcando principalmente os sistemas sancionatórios do Direito Penal e do Direito Administrativo Sancionador, recorrendo ao método dedutivo e partindo da premissa que essas esferas sancionatórias são peças menores deste complexo macrossistema. O estudo contempla uma análise dos pontos de contato existentes entre o Direito Penal e o Direito Administrativo Sancionador, sob o aspecto de uma relativa dependência ou subordinação do segundo em relação ao primeiro. A aproximação desses microssistemas punitivos foi investigada sob determinadas condições de similitude destacadas em precedentes do Tribunal Europeu dos Direitos do Homem e do Supremo Tribunal Federal, para compreender o significado da independência mitigada entre eles. Após o escrutínio da premissa, identificou-se a seguinte situação problema: Qual o grau de vinculação da sentença absolutória criminal sobre o mesmo conjunto fático-probatório objeto de apuração na seara do Direito Administrativo Sancionador? Como hipótese de pesquisa, tendo como parâmetro o estado da arte sobre a temática, apurou-se que a doutrina e a jurisprudência dominantes defendem a independência desses sistemas punitivos, porém, verificou-se que existem outros aspectos valorativos do Direito Penal que podem refletir no campo de atuação do Direito Administrativo Sancionador. Constatou-se que exsurge na doutrina e na jurisprudência uma nova linha hermenêutica que repele a punição em duplicidade (ne bis in idem) sob o argumento da independência mitigada dessas esferas sancionadoras. A presente pesquisa desenvolveu-se neste norte com a finalidade de definir um modelo sancionatório lastreado na independência mitigada das esferas punitivas com ascendência hierárquica do Direito Penal.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2022-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/article/view/5662910.23925/ddem.v.1.n.4.56629Democratic Rights & Modern State; Vol. 1 No. 4 (2022): Revista Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; 112-128Derechos democráticos & estado moderno; Vol. 1 Núm. 4 (2022): Revista Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; 112-128Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; v. 1 n. 4 (2022): Revista Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; 112-1282675-764810.23925//ddem.v.1.n.4reponame:Direitos Democráticos & Estado Modernoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/article/view/56629/39745Copyright (c) 2022 Direitos Democráticos & Estado Modernohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDias, Jean ColbertFerreira, AndersonKnoerr, Fernando Gustavo2023-01-17T19:14:56Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/56629Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEMPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/oairevistadodireitopucsp@gmail.com2675-76482675-7648opendoar:2023-01-17T19:14:56Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
criminal law and sanctioning administrative law as parts of the brazilian punitive macrossystem and rejection to bis in idem El El derecho penal y el derecho administrativo sancionador como partes del macrosistema punitivo brasileño y el rechazo del BIS IN IDEM O Direito penal e o direito administrativo sancionador como peças do macrossistema punitivo brasileiro e a rejeição ao BIS IN IDEM |
title |
criminal law and sanctioning administrative law as parts of the brazilian punitive macrossystem and rejection to bis in idem |
spellingShingle |
criminal law and sanctioning administrative law as parts of the brazilian punitive macrossystem and rejection to bis in idem Dias, Jean Colbert Direito Penal Direito Administrativo Sancionador Independência Mitigada Bis in idem Criminal Law Administrative Sanctioning Law Independence Mitigated Bis in idem Derecho penal Derecho Administrativo Sancionador Independencia mitigado Bis in ídem |
title_short |
criminal law and sanctioning administrative law as parts of the brazilian punitive macrossystem and rejection to bis in idem |
title_full |
criminal law and sanctioning administrative law as parts of the brazilian punitive macrossystem and rejection to bis in idem |
title_fullStr |
criminal law and sanctioning administrative law as parts of the brazilian punitive macrossystem and rejection to bis in idem |
title_full_unstemmed |
criminal law and sanctioning administrative law as parts of the brazilian punitive macrossystem and rejection to bis in idem |
title_sort |
criminal law and sanctioning administrative law as parts of the brazilian punitive macrossystem and rejection to bis in idem |
author |
Dias, Jean Colbert |
author_facet |
Dias, Jean Colbert Ferreira, Anderson Knoerr, Fernando Gustavo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira, Anderson Knoerr, Fernando Gustavo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dias, Jean Colbert Ferreira, Anderson Knoerr, Fernando Gustavo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito Penal Direito Administrativo Sancionador Independência Mitigada Bis in idem Criminal Law Administrative Sanctioning Law Independence Mitigated Bis in idem Derecho penal Derecho Administrativo Sancionador Independencia mitigado Bis in ídem |
topic |
Direito Penal Direito Administrativo Sancionador Independência Mitigada Bis in idem Criminal Law Administrative Sanctioning Law Independence Mitigated Bis in idem Derecho penal Derecho Administrativo Sancionador Independencia mitigado Bis in ídem |
description |
This research deals with the Brazilian punitive macrosystem, covering mainly the sanctioning systems of Criminal Law and Sanctioning Administrative Law, using the deductive method and starting from the premise that these sanctioning spheres are minor parts of this complex macrosystem. The study contemplates an analysis of the existing points of contact between Criminal Law and Sanctioning Administrative Law, under the aspect of a relative dependence or subordination of the latter in relation to the former. The approximation of these punitive microsystems was investigated under certain conditions of similarity highlighted in precedents of the European Court of Human Rights and the Federal Supreme Court, in order to understand the meaning of the mitigated independence between them. After scrutiny of the premise, the following problem situation was identified: What is the degree of binding of the criminal acquittal sentence on the same factual-evidence object of investigation in the area of Sanctioning Administrative Law? As a research hypothesis, using the state of the art on the subject as a parameter, it was found that the dominant doctrine and jurisprudence defend the independence of these punitive systems, however, it was found that there are other aspects of criminal law that may reflect on the field of action of Sanctioning Administrative Law. It was found that a new hermeneutical line emerges in doctrine and jurisprudence that rejects punishment in duplicity (ne bis in idem) under the argument of the mitigated independence of these sanctioning spheres. The present research was developed in this north with the purpose of defining a sanction model based on the mitigated independence of the punitive spheres with hierarchical ascendancy of the Criminal Law. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/article/view/56629 10.23925/ddem.v.1.n.4.56629 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/article/view/56629 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/ddem.v.1.n.4.56629 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/article/view/56629/39745 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Democratic Rights & Modern State; Vol. 1 No. 4 (2022): Revista Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; 112-128 Derechos democráticos & estado moderno; Vol. 1 Núm. 4 (2022): Revista Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; 112-128 Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; v. 1 n. 4 (2022): Revista Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; 112-128 2675-7648 10.23925//ddem.v.1.n.4 reponame:Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno |
collection |
Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadodireitopucsp@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1796798344199143424 |