A particular case: dialogue or interview?

• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Luiz Antônio da
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Letras (Santa Maria. Online)
• Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/letras/article/view/38823
• topic: Interaction; Orality; Conversation; Dialogue; Conversational roles; Interação; Oralidade; Conversação; Diálogo; Papéis conversacionais

At the beginning of the studies on Conversational Analysis, in the 1980’s, dialogue, following the turn-taking proposed by Sacks, Schegloff and Jefferson (1974), the ababab type, is considered as the prototypical sample of orality. Continuing the work on conversation, it was possible to realize that such classification is not so simple. It seems that the more the number of participants increases, the more complex the description of the process becomes.This study aims to study the Survey 396, part of the NURC / SP Project, labeled D2, that is, a dialogue between two informants. Following the modern studies on interaction, it was possible to conclude that it is not a simple dialogue between two informants, because the characteristics that involve the interacting derive to other parallel characteristics, not expected in a simple recording of the NURC / SP Project.Based on Goffman (1981) and Kerbrat-Orecchini (1995), it was possible to explain the complexity of this particular investigation.