Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/16626 |
Resumo: | This work discusses and analyses realist conceptions of the concept of biological species. There are two broad realist approaches to this concept, viz. the monist approach and the pluralistic approach. Monist conceptions sustain that the species category must be conceptualized through only one species concept, providing just one criterion of delimitation of taxa. On the other side, pluralistic conceptions claim that different concepts correspond to the species category, so that there would be distinct criteria for the delimitation of taxa. Some of the most influential monist conceptions are presented under the titles “biological species concept”, “evolutionary species concept”, “ecological species concept’ and “Henning’s species concept”. Because they employ only one criterion of taxa delimitation, monist conceptions do not satisfy the theoretical requirements for the conceptualization of the diversity of natural organisms. Under this light, pluralistic concepts of species are possible alternatives to monist concepts and their respective problems. This work highlights two pluralistic approaches among those prominent in the current literature: Philip Kitcher’s ontological pluralism approach, also called pluralistic realism, and Richard A. Richards’ approach, called conceptual division of labor. These approaches will be analyzed and discussed along with the monistic concepts presented here, in order to adjudicate their adequacy to the solution of the species concept problem. |
id |
UFSM-20_9cf6141aa5ec78e8ea4a4996e8bf566e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/16626 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-20 |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
3913 |
spelling |
2019-05-23T17:22:37Z2019-05-23T17:22:37Z2017-08-22http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/16626This work discusses and analyses realist conceptions of the concept of biological species. There are two broad realist approaches to this concept, viz. the monist approach and the pluralistic approach. Monist conceptions sustain that the species category must be conceptualized through only one species concept, providing just one criterion of delimitation of taxa. On the other side, pluralistic conceptions claim that different concepts correspond to the species category, so that there would be distinct criteria for the delimitation of taxa. Some of the most influential monist conceptions are presented under the titles “biological species concept”, “evolutionary species concept”, “ecological species concept’ and “Henning’s species concept”. Because they employ only one criterion of taxa delimitation, monist conceptions do not satisfy the theoretical requirements for the conceptualization of the diversity of natural organisms. Under this light, pluralistic concepts of species are possible alternatives to monist concepts and their respective problems. This work highlights two pluralistic approaches among those prominent in the current literature: Philip Kitcher’s ontological pluralism approach, also called pluralistic realism, and Richard A. Richards’ approach, called conceptual division of labor. These approaches will be analyzed and discussed along with the monistic concepts presented here, in order to adjudicate their adequacy to the solution of the species concept problem.Este trabalho discute e analisa concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica. Na literatura, há duas grandes abordagens realistas desse conceito, a abordagem monista e a abordagem pluralista. Concepções monistas sustentam que a categoria de espécie deve ser conceituada mediante um único conceito de espécie, possuindo assim apenas um critério para a delimitação de taxa. Por outro lado, concepções pluralistas afirmam que diferentes conceitos correspondem à categoria de espécie, de sorte que haveria distintos critérios para delimitação de taxa. Algumas das concepções monistas mais influentes são apresentadas sob as rubricas de “conceito biológico de espécie”, “conceito evolutivo de espécie”, “conceito ecológico de espécie” e “conceito de espécie de Hennig”. Ao utilizar-se de apenas um critério para a delimitação de espécie biológica, os conceitos monistas acabam por não satisfazer as necessidades teóricas que a diversidade de organismos naturais requerem para sua conceitualização. À luz disso, os conceitos pluralistas de espécie apresentam-se como possíveis alternativas aos conceitos monistas e seus respectivos problemas. Dentre as abordagens pluralistas proeminentes na literatura atual, destacaremos duas: a abordagem pluralista ontológica de Philip Kitcher, denominada realismo pluralista e a abordagem pluralista hierárquica de Richard A. Richards denominada divisão conceitual do trabalho. Tais abordagens são analisadas e discutidas a par dos conceitos monistas apresentados, com o objetivo de oferecer um parecer sobre sua adequação para a solução do problema do conceito de espécie.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUFSMBrasilFilosofiaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessConceito de espécieCategoria de espécieAbordagens realistasAbordagens monistasAbordagens pluralistasSpecies conceptSpecies categoryRealist approachesMonist approachesPluralistic approachesCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAMonismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e críticaMonism and pluralism among realist conceptions of the concept of biological species: analysis and criticisminfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisFonseca, Renato Duartehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9762748021331579Severo, Rogério Passoshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0584528242177559Sautter, Frank Thomashttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760Caponi, Gustavo Andréshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5580414399056283http://lattes.cnpq.br/6274508086442677Pereira, Karine Rossi700100000004600e8e5d8a2-6433-4ed2-9565-8ae711acdc9d4889cd3d-ad57-4f75-a4eb-f3cb36622c27aefb0d30-83ba-4010-93a6-450f65e4b08ed15595ec-30a8-4fe2-bde8-addebad0d8f3f530daeb-b2d6-4396-88ce-d505d9638119reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdfDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdfDissertação de Mestradoapplication/pdf1070868http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/1/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdfef237083c4f4694d428fd429b943d99eMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53TEXTDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.txtDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain291001http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/4/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.txt2aa6c1f2a0fa6c7c4dc4afad8d69d463MD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4361http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/5/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.jpg4efb6df5446153931f0437ed2cdc3748MD551/166262019-05-24 03:01:26.437oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/16626TElDRU7Dh0EgREUgRElTVFJJQlVJw4fDg08gTsODTy1FWENMVVNJVkEKCkNvbSBhIGFwcmVzZW50YcOnw6NvIGRlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCB2b2PDqiAobyBhdXRvciAoZXMpIG91IG8gdGl0dWxhciBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgZGUgYXV0b3IpIGNvbmNlZGUgw6AgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlCkZlZGVyYWwgZGUgU2FudGEgTWFyaWEgKFVGU00pIG8gZGlyZWl0byBuw6NvLWV4Y2x1c2l2byBkZSByZXByb2R1emlyLCAgdHJhZHV6aXIgKGNvbmZvcm1lIGRlZmluaWRvIGFiYWl4byksIGUvb3UKZGlzdHJpYnVpciBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IGRpc3NlcnRhw6fDo28gKGluY2x1aW5kbyBvIHJlc3VtbykgcG9yIHRvZG8gbyBtdW5kbyBubyBmb3JtYXRvIGltcHJlc3NvIGUgZWxldHLDtG5pY28gZQplbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFVGU00gcG9kZSwgc2VtIGFsdGVyYXIgbyBjb250ZcO6ZG8sIHRyYW5zcG9yIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbwpwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgVUZTTSBwb2RlIG1hbnRlciBtYWlzIGRlIHVtYSBjw7NwaWEgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdQpkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcwpuZXN0YSBsaWNlbsOnYS4gVm9jw6ogdGFtYsOpbSBkZWNsYXJhIHF1ZSBvIGRlcMOzc2l0byBkYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIG7Do28sIHF1ZSBzZWphIGRlIHNldQpjb25oZWNpbWVudG8sIGluZnJpbmdlIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIGRlIG5pbmd1w6ltLgoKQ2FzbyBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IGRpc3NlcnRhw6fDo28gY29udGVuaGEgbWF0ZXJpYWwgcXVlIHZvY8OqIG7Do28gcG9zc3VpIGEgdGl0dWxhcmlkYWRlIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcywgdm9jw6oKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc8OjbyBpcnJlc3RyaXRhIGRvIGRldGVudG9yIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBwYXJhIGNvbmNlZGVyIMOgIFVGU00Kb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXByZXNlbnRhZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3TDoSBjbGFyYW1lbnRlCmlkZW50aWZpY2FkbyBlIHJlY29uaGVjaWRvIG5vIHRleHRvIG91IG5vIGNvbnRlw7pkbyBkYSB0ZXNlIG91IGRpc3NlcnRhw6fDo28gb3JhIGRlcG9zaXRhZGEuCgpDQVNPIEEgVEVTRSBPVSBESVNTRVJUQcOHw4NPIE9SQSBERVBPU0lUQURBIFRFTkhBIFNJRE8gUkVTVUxUQURPIERFIFVNIFBBVFJPQ8ONTklPIE9VCkFQT0lPIERFIFVNQSBBR8OKTkNJQSBERSBGT01FTlRPIE9VIE9VVFJPIE9SR0FOSVNNTyBRVUUgTsODTyBTRUpBIEEgVUZTTQosIFZPQ8OKIERFQ0xBUkEgUVVFIFJFU1BFSVRPVSBUT0RPUyBFIFFVQUlTUVVFUiBESVJFSVRPUyBERSBSRVZJU8ODTyBDT01PClRBTULDiU0gQVMgREVNQUlTIE9CUklHQcOHw5VFUyBFWElHSURBUyBQT1IgQ09OVFJBVE8gT1UgQUNPUkRPLgoKQSBVRlNNIHNlIGNvbXByb21ldGUgYSBpZGVudGlmaWNhciBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIG8gc2V1IG5vbWUgKHMpIG91IG8ocykgbm9tZShzKSBkbyhzKQpkZXRlbnRvcihlcykgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIGRhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbywgZSBuw6NvIGZhcsOhIHF1YWxxdWVyIGFsdGVyYcOnw6NvLCBhbMOpbSBkYXF1ZWxhcwpjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLgoKRepositório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132019-05-24T06:01:26Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Monism and pluralism among realist conceptions of the concept of biological species: analysis and criticism |
title |
Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica |
spellingShingle |
Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica Pereira, Karine Rossi Conceito de espécie Categoria de espécie Abordagens realistas Abordagens monistas Abordagens pluralistas Species concept Species category Realist approaches Monist approaches Pluralistic approaches CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica |
title_full |
Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica |
title_fullStr |
Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica |
title_full_unstemmed |
Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica |
title_sort |
Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica |
author |
Pereira, Karine Rossi |
author_facet |
Pereira, Karine Rossi |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Fonseca, Renato Duarte |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9762748021331579 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Severo, Rogério Passos |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0584528242177559 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Sautter, Frank Thomas |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Caponi, Gustavo Andrés |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5580414399056283 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6274508086442677 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira, Karine Rossi |
contributor_str_mv |
Fonseca, Renato Duarte Severo, Rogério Passos Sautter, Frank Thomas Caponi, Gustavo Andrés |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Conceito de espécie Categoria de espécie Abordagens realistas Abordagens monistas Abordagens pluralistas |
topic |
Conceito de espécie Categoria de espécie Abordagens realistas Abordagens monistas Abordagens pluralistas Species concept Species category Realist approaches Monist approaches Pluralistic approaches CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Species concept Species category Realist approaches Monist approaches Pluralistic approaches |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
This work discusses and analyses realist conceptions of the concept of biological species. There are two broad realist approaches to this concept, viz. the monist approach and the pluralistic approach. Monist conceptions sustain that the species category must be conceptualized through only one species concept, providing just one criterion of delimitation of taxa. On the other side, pluralistic conceptions claim that different concepts correspond to the species category, so that there would be distinct criteria for the delimitation of taxa. Some of the most influential monist conceptions are presented under the titles “biological species concept”, “evolutionary species concept”, “ecological species concept’ and “Henning’s species concept”. Because they employ only one criterion of taxa delimitation, monist conceptions do not satisfy the theoretical requirements for the conceptualization of the diversity of natural organisms. Under this light, pluralistic concepts of species are possible alternatives to monist concepts and their respective problems. This work highlights two pluralistic approaches among those prominent in the current literature: Philip Kitcher’s ontological pluralism approach, also called pluralistic realism, and Richard A. Richards’ approach, called conceptual division of labor. These approaches will be analyzed and discussed along with the monistic concepts presented here, in order to adjudicate their adequacy to the solution of the species concept problem. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-22 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-23T17:22:37Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-23T17:22:37Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/16626 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/16626 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
700100000004 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
e8e5d8a2-6433-4ed2-9565-8ae711acdc9d 4889cd3d-ad57-4f75-a4eb-f3cb36622c27 aefb0d30-83ba-4010-93a6-450f65e4b08e d15595ec-30a8-4fe2-bde8-addebad0d8f3 f530daeb-b2d6-4396-88ce-d505d9638119 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Filosofia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/1/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/2/license_rdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/3/license.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/4/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/5/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
ef237083c4f4694d428fd429b943d99e 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df 2aa6c1f2a0fa6c7c4dc4afad8d69d463 4efb6df5446153931f0437ed2cdc3748 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801223726473150464 |