Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Karine Rossi
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/16626
Resumo: This work discusses and analyses realist conceptions of the concept of biological species. There are two broad realist approaches to this concept, viz. the monist approach and the pluralistic approach. Monist conceptions sustain that the species category must be conceptualized through only one species concept, providing just one criterion of delimitation of taxa. On the other side, pluralistic conceptions claim that different concepts correspond to the species category, so that there would be distinct criteria for the delimitation of taxa. Some of the most influential monist conceptions are presented under the titles “biological species concept”, “evolutionary species concept”, “ecological species concept’ and “Henning’s species concept”. Because they employ only one criterion of taxa delimitation, monist conceptions do not satisfy the theoretical requirements for the conceptualization of the diversity of natural organisms. Under this light, pluralistic concepts of species are possible alternatives to monist concepts and their respective problems. This work highlights two pluralistic approaches among those prominent in the current literature: Philip Kitcher’s ontological pluralism approach, also called pluralistic realism, and Richard A. Richards’ approach, called conceptual division of labor. These approaches will be analyzed and discussed along with the monistic concepts presented here, in order to adjudicate their adequacy to the solution of the species concept problem.
id UFSM-20_9cf6141aa5ec78e8ea4a4996e8bf566e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/16626
network_acronym_str UFSM-20
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str 3913
spelling 2019-05-23T17:22:37Z2019-05-23T17:22:37Z2017-08-22http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/16626This work discusses and analyses realist conceptions of the concept of biological species. There are two broad realist approaches to this concept, viz. the monist approach and the pluralistic approach. Monist conceptions sustain that the species category must be conceptualized through only one species concept, providing just one criterion of delimitation of taxa. On the other side, pluralistic conceptions claim that different concepts correspond to the species category, so that there would be distinct criteria for the delimitation of taxa. Some of the most influential monist conceptions are presented under the titles “biological species concept”, “evolutionary species concept”, “ecological species concept’ and “Henning’s species concept”. Because they employ only one criterion of taxa delimitation, monist conceptions do not satisfy the theoretical requirements for the conceptualization of the diversity of natural organisms. Under this light, pluralistic concepts of species are possible alternatives to monist concepts and their respective problems. This work highlights two pluralistic approaches among those prominent in the current literature: Philip Kitcher’s ontological pluralism approach, also called pluralistic realism, and Richard A. Richards’ approach, called conceptual division of labor. These approaches will be analyzed and discussed along with the monistic concepts presented here, in order to adjudicate their adequacy to the solution of the species concept problem.Este trabalho discute e analisa concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica. Na literatura, há duas grandes abordagens realistas desse conceito, a abordagem monista e a abordagem pluralista. Concepções monistas sustentam que a categoria de espécie deve ser conceituada mediante um único conceito de espécie, possuindo assim apenas um critério para a delimitação de taxa. Por outro lado, concepções pluralistas afirmam que diferentes conceitos correspondem à categoria de espécie, de sorte que haveria distintos critérios para delimitação de taxa. Algumas das concepções monistas mais influentes são apresentadas sob as rubricas de “conceito biológico de espécie”, “conceito evolutivo de espécie”, “conceito ecológico de espécie” e “conceito de espécie de Hennig”. Ao utilizar-se de apenas um critério para a delimitação de espécie biológica, os conceitos monistas acabam por não satisfazer as necessidades teóricas que a diversidade de organismos naturais requerem para sua conceitualização. À luz disso, os conceitos pluralistas de espécie apresentam-se como possíveis alternativas aos conceitos monistas e seus respectivos problemas. Dentre as abordagens pluralistas proeminentes na literatura atual, destacaremos duas: a abordagem pluralista ontológica de Philip Kitcher, denominada realismo pluralista e a abordagem pluralista hierárquica de Richard A. Richards denominada divisão conceitual do trabalho. Tais abordagens são analisadas e discutidas a par dos conceitos monistas apresentados, com o objetivo de oferecer um parecer sobre sua adequação para a solução do problema do conceito de espécie.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUFSMBrasilFilosofiaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessConceito de espécieCategoria de espécieAbordagens realistasAbordagens monistasAbordagens pluralistasSpecies conceptSpecies categoryRealist approachesMonist approachesPluralistic approachesCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAMonismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e críticaMonism and pluralism among realist conceptions of the concept of biological species: analysis and criticisminfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisFonseca, Renato Duartehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9762748021331579Severo, Rogério Passoshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0584528242177559Sautter, Frank Thomashttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760Caponi, Gustavo Andréshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5580414399056283http://lattes.cnpq.br/6274508086442677Pereira, Karine Rossi700100000004600e8e5d8a2-6433-4ed2-9565-8ae711acdc9d4889cd3d-ad57-4f75-a4eb-f3cb36622c27aefb0d30-83ba-4010-93a6-450f65e4b08ed15595ec-30a8-4fe2-bde8-addebad0d8f3f530daeb-b2d6-4396-88ce-d505d9638119reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdfDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdfDissertação de Mestradoapplication/pdf1070868http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/1/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdfef237083c4f4694d428fd429b943d99eMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53TEXTDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.txtDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain291001http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/4/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.txt2aa6c1f2a0fa6c7c4dc4afad8d69d463MD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4361http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/5/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.jpg4efb6df5446153931f0437ed2cdc3748MD551/166262019-05-24 03:01:26.437oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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ório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132019-05-24T06:01:26Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Monism and pluralism among realist conceptions of the concept of biological species: analysis and criticism
title Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica
spellingShingle Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica
Pereira, Karine Rossi
Conceito de espécie
Categoria de espécie
Abordagens realistas
Abordagens monistas
Abordagens pluralistas
Species concept
Species category
Realist approaches
Monist approaches
Pluralistic approaches
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
title_short Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica
title_full Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica
title_fullStr Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica
title_full_unstemmed Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica
title_sort Monismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica
author Pereira, Karine Rossi
author_facet Pereira, Karine Rossi
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Fonseca, Renato Duarte
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9762748021331579
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Severo, Rogério Passos
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0584528242177559
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Sautter, Frank Thomas
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Caponi, Gustavo Andrés
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5580414399056283
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6274508086442677
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Karine Rossi
contributor_str_mv Fonseca, Renato Duarte
Severo, Rogério Passos
Sautter, Frank Thomas
Caponi, Gustavo Andrés
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Conceito de espécie
Categoria de espécie
Abordagens realistas
Abordagens monistas
Abordagens pluralistas
topic Conceito de espécie
Categoria de espécie
Abordagens realistas
Abordagens monistas
Abordagens pluralistas
Species concept
Species category
Realist approaches
Monist approaches
Pluralistic approaches
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Species concept
Species category
Realist approaches
Monist approaches
Pluralistic approaches
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
description This work discusses and analyses realist conceptions of the concept of biological species. There are two broad realist approaches to this concept, viz. the monist approach and the pluralistic approach. Monist conceptions sustain that the species category must be conceptualized through only one species concept, providing just one criterion of delimitation of taxa. On the other side, pluralistic conceptions claim that different concepts correspond to the species category, so that there would be distinct criteria for the delimitation of taxa. Some of the most influential monist conceptions are presented under the titles “biological species concept”, “evolutionary species concept”, “ecological species concept’ and “Henning’s species concept”. Because they employ only one criterion of taxa delimitation, monist conceptions do not satisfy the theoretical requirements for the conceptualization of the diversity of natural organisms. Under this light, pluralistic concepts of species are possible alternatives to monist concepts and their respective problems. This work highlights two pluralistic approaches among those prominent in the current literature: Philip Kitcher’s ontological pluralism approach, also called pluralistic realism, and Richard A. Richards’ approach, called conceptual division of labor. These approaches will be analyzed and discussed along with the monistic concepts presented here, in order to adjudicate their adequacy to the solution of the species concept problem.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017-08-22
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-05-23T17:22:37Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2019-05-23T17:22:37Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/16626
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/16626
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 700100000004
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv e8e5d8a2-6433-4ed2-9565-8ae711acdc9d
4889cd3d-ad57-4f75-a4eb-f3cb36622c27
aefb0d30-83ba-4010-93a6-450f65e4b08e
d15595ec-30a8-4fe2-bde8-addebad0d8f3
f530daeb-b2d6-4396-88ce-d505d9638119
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Filosofia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/1/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/2/license_rdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/3/license.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/4/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/16626/5/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_PEREIRA_KARINE.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ef237083c4f4694d428fd429b943d99e
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df
2aa6c1f2a0fa6c7c4dc4afad8d69d463
4efb6df5446153931f0437ed2cdc3748
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801223726473150464