A Lógica, o Nonsense e a filosofia da lógica de Lewis Carroll
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23316 |
Resumo: | This thesis is divided into four articles, covering different aspects of Lewis Carroll's Logic and Philosophy of Logic. The first article reproduces three paradoxes presented by Lewis Carroll, and it examines how Carroll, from his logical tooling, treated such paradoxes compared to the treatment offered by other authors. The article reproduces the controversy between Lewis Carroll and John Cook Wilson about the nature of the implication, concluding that Carroll defended a position congruent with the verifunctional interpretation of the notion of implication adopted by contemporary logicians. The second article investigates whether the essential characteristics that define the Smullyan's Tree Method were already present, about 50 years earlier, in the Carroll's Tree Method. After reconstruction of the history of the development of the tableaux method and the analysis of the essential characteristics of both authors methods, including a comparison of examples of their applications, we conclude that the characteristics that define the Smullyan's Trees were already present in Carroll's Trees, in such a way that, for historical justice, the method should be known as "Carroll-Smullyan's Trees." This conclusion highlights the significant Carrollian contribution to the development of Logic, demonstrating the relevance of an investigation into the author's position in the Philosophy of Logic. The third article presents a notion of nonsense appropriate to Carroll's works and derived from his theoretical framework, concluding that Carroll used nonsense as a means of inducing instructive ideas in his readers. The article also compares Carroll and Wittgenstein's nonsense notion and argues that the two authors had similar attitudes towards nonsense. The fourth article presents an original hypothesis about Carroll's Philosophy of Logic, stating that Carroll defended a position analogous to the current pragmatic position. |
id |
UFSM-20_c21ff9f919298096121e374b200c12c9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/23316 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-20 |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
3913 |
spelling |
2021-12-15T12:26:48Z2021-12-15T12:26:48Z2021-08-13http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23316This thesis is divided into four articles, covering different aspects of Lewis Carroll's Logic and Philosophy of Logic. The first article reproduces three paradoxes presented by Lewis Carroll, and it examines how Carroll, from his logical tooling, treated such paradoxes compared to the treatment offered by other authors. The article reproduces the controversy between Lewis Carroll and John Cook Wilson about the nature of the implication, concluding that Carroll defended a position congruent with the verifunctional interpretation of the notion of implication adopted by contemporary logicians. The second article investigates whether the essential characteristics that define the Smullyan's Tree Method were already present, about 50 years earlier, in the Carroll's Tree Method. After reconstruction of the history of the development of the tableaux method and the analysis of the essential characteristics of both authors methods, including a comparison of examples of their applications, we conclude that the characteristics that define the Smullyan's Trees were already present in Carroll's Trees, in such a way that, for historical justice, the method should be known as "Carroll-Smullyan's Trees." This conclusion highlights the significant Carrollian contribution to the development of Logic, demonstrating the relevance of an investigation into the author's position in the Philosophy of Logic. The third article presents a notion of nonsense appropriate to Carroll's works and derived from his theoretical framework, concluding that Carroll used nonsense as a means of inducing instructive ideas in his readers. The article also compares Carroll and Wittgenstein's nonsense notion and argues that the two authors had similar attitudes towards nonsense. The fourth article presents an original hypothesis about Carroll's Philosophy of Logic, stating that Carroll defended a position analogous to the current pragmatic position.A presente tese se divide em quatro artigos, abordando distintos aspectos da Lógica e da Filosofia da Lógica de Lewis Carroll. O primeiro artigo reproduz três paradoxos apresentados por Lewis Carroll, examinando como tais paradoxos foram tratados por Carroll a partir de seu próprio instrumental lógico em comparação ao tratamento ofertado por outros autores. O artigo reproduz a controvérsia entre Lewis Carroll e John Cook Wilson sobre a natureza da implicação, concluindo que Carroll defendeu uma posição congruente com a interpretação verofuncional da noção de implicação adotada pelos lógicos contemporâneos. O segundo artigo investiga se as características básicas que definem o Método de Árvores de Smullyan já estavam presentes, cerca de 50 anos antes, no Método de Árvores de Carroll. Após uma reconstrução da história do desenvolvimento dos métodos de árvores de refutação e da análise das características básicas dos métodos dos dois autores, incluindo o cotejamento de exemplos de suas aplicações, conclui-se que as características básicas que definem as Árvores de Smullyan já estavam presentes nas Árvores de Carroll, de tal modo que, por justiça histórica, o método deveria ser conhecido como “Árvores de Carroll-Smullyan”. Tal conclusão evidencia a maior contribuição carrolliana para o desenvolvimento da Lógica, demonstrando a relevância de uma investigação sobre a posição em Filosofia da Lógica do autor. O terceiro artigo apresenta uma noção de nonsense adequada às obras de Carroll e oriunda de seu próprio arcabouço teórico, concluindo que Carroll utilizava o nonsense como um meio de inculcar ideias instrutivas em seus leitores. O artigo também compara a noção de nonsense de Carroll e Wittgenstein e defende que os dois autores nutriam atitudes análogas em relação ao nonsense. O quarto artigo apresenta uma hipótese original sobre a Filosofia da Lógica carrolliana, afirmando que Carroll defendia uma posição análoga à posição pragmática contemporânea.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUFSMBrasilFilosofiaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLewis CarrollMétodo de árvoresFilosofia da lógicaNonsenseTree methodPhilosophy of logicCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAA Lógica, o Nonsense e a filosofia da lógica de Lewis CarrollThe Logic, the Nonsense and the philosophy of logic of Lewis Carrollinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisSautter, Frank Thomashttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760Teixeira, Rafael MontoitoSousa, Enne Karol Venancio deSilva, Mitieli Seixas daMedeiros, Eduardo Vicentini dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9999572531550043Lindemann, John Lennon7001000000046006006006006006006007b4df9b2-c023-4806-81a9-f4f3371e5518c31b99b4-597e-4c62-8ea0-e575dbd1b47c18902a24-6ab6-4600-884e-533a1967d61ab9839975-f6fb-4abd-b65e-c4981577224f407f2287-5427-4110-a8a4-7abca5732228bc7be818-487f-45f4-8fb7-5fbb5a9068dareponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23316/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23316/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53ORIGINALTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2021_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdfTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2021_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdfTese de doutoradoapplication/pdf1403663http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23316/1/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2021_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf3e8d6b668f4a0b037401eba39cd32041MD51TEXTTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2021_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.txtTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2021_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain328197http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23316/4/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2021_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.txtcdb05996ff1e62410d8211a0ab8845efMD54THUMBNAILTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2021_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.jpgTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2021_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4351http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23316/5/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2021_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.jpga2f004d170223cbbc9211616f46470bbMD551/233162021-12-16 03:03:50.493oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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ório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132021-12-16T06:03:50Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
A Lógica, o Nonsense e a filosofia da lógica de Lewis Carroll |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
The Logic, the Nonsense and the philosophy of logic of Lewis Carroll |
title |
A Lógica, o Nonsense e a filosofia da lógica de Lewis Carroll |
spellingShingle |
A Lógica, o Nonsense e a filosofia da lógica de Lewis Carroll Lindemann, John Lennon Lewis Carroll Método de árvores Filosofia da lógica Nonsense Tree method Philosophy of logic CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
A Lógica, o Nonsense e a filosofia da lógica de Lewis Carroll |
title_full |
A Lógica, o Nonsense e a filosofia da lógica de Lewis Carroll |
title_fullStr |
A Lógica, o Nonsense e a filosofia da lógica de Lewis Carroll |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Lógica, o Nonsense e a filosofia da lógica de Lewis Carroll |
title_sort |
A Lógica, o Nonsense e a filosofia da lógica de Lewis Carroll |
author |
Lindemann, John Lennon |
author_facet |
Lindemann, John Lennon |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Sautter, Frank Thomas |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Rafael Montoito |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Sousa, Enne Karol Venancio de |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Mitieli Seixas da |
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv |
Medeiros, Eduardo Vicentini de |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9999572531550043 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lindemann, John Lennon |
contributor_str_mv |
Sautter, Frank Thomas Teixeira, Rafael Montoito Sousa, Enne Karol Venancio de Silva, Mitieli Seixas da Medeiros, Eduardo Vicentini de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lewis Carroll Método de árvores Filosofia da lógica Nonsense |
topic |
Lewis Carroll Método de árvores Filosofia da lógica Nonsense Tree method Philosophy of logic CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Tree method Philosophy of logic |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
This thesis is divided into four articles, covering different aspects of Lewis Carroll's Logic and Philosophy of Logic. The first article reproduces three paradoxes presented by Lewis Carroll, and it examines how Carroll, from his logical tooling, treated such paradoxes compared to the treatment offered by other authors. The article reproduces the controversy between Lewis Carroll and John Cook Wilson about the nature of the implication, concluding that Carroll defended a position congruent with the verifunctional interpretation of the notion of implication adopted by contemporary logicians. The second article investigates whether the essential characteristics that define the Smullyan's Tree Method were already present, about 50 years earlier, in the Carroll's Tree Method. After reconstruction of the history of the development of the tableaux method and the analysis of the essential characteristics of both authors methods, including a comparison of examples of their applications, we conclude that the characteristics that define the Smullyan's Trees were already present in Carroll's Trees, in such a way that, for historical justice, the method should be known as "Carroll-Smullyan's Trees." This conclusion highlights the significant Carrollian contribution to the development of Logic, demonstrating the relevance of an investigation into the author's position in the Philosophy of Logic. The third article presents a notion of nonsense appropriate to Carroll's works and derived from his theoretical framework, concluding that Carroll used nonsense as a means of inducing instructive ideas in his readers. The article also compares Carroll and Wittgenstein's nonsense notion and argues that the two authors had similar attitudes towards nonsense. The fourth article presents an original hypothesis about Carroll's Philosophy of Logic, stating that Carroll defended a position analogous to the current pragmatic position. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-15T12:26:48Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-15T12:26:48Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-13 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23316 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23316 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
700100000004 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 600 600 600 600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
7b4df9b2-c023-4806-81a9-f4f3371e5518 c31b99b4-597e-4c62-8ea0-e575dbd1b47c 18902a24-6ab6-4600-884e-533a1967d61a b9839975-f6fb-4abd-b65e-c4981577224f 407f2287-5427-4110-a8a4-7abca5732228 bc7be818-487f-45f4-8fb7-5fbb5a9068da |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Filosofia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23316/2/license_rdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23316/3/license.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23316/1/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2021_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23316/4/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2021_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/23316/5/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2021_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df 3e8d6b668f4a0b037401eba39cd32041 cdb05996ff1e62410d8211a0ab8845ef a2f004d170223cbbc9211616f46470bb |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801223767451500544 |