A lógica de Lewis Carroll
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/12721 |
Resumo: | The present dissertation presents an examination of the Carrollian logic through the reconstruction of its syllogistic theory. Lewis Carroll was one of the main responsible for the dissemination of logic during the nineteenth century, but most of his logical writings remained unknown until a posthumous publication of 1977. The reconstruction of the Carrollian syllogistic theory was based on the comparison of the two books on author's logic, "The Game of Logic" and "Symbolic Logic". The analysis of the Carrollian syllogistics starts from a study of the historical context of development of the logic and the developments of syllogistics previous to the contribution of the author. Situated in the historical period of algebraical logic, Carrollian syllogistics is characterized as a conservative extension of the Aristotelian syllogistics, the main innovation is the use of negative terms and the introduction of a diagrammatic method suitable for the representation of negative terms. The diagrammatic method of the Carrollian syllogistics presents advances in relation to the methods of Euler and Venn. The use of negative terms also requires a redefinition of the notion of syllogism, simplifying and expanding the amount of arguments amenable to logical treatment. Carroll does not use four, but only three categorical propositions in his syllogistic, with interpretation of existential presuppositions congruent with a syntactic-existential reading. Carrollian syllogistics uses some techniques found in the work of algebraists of logic and also made the same confusions between notions of "class" and "member" that were common in the period. Convinced of the social utility of logic and dedicated to popularize it, Carroll priorized a creation of new didactics for the teaching of logic in his works, where he can include his diagrammatic method of solving syllogisms. Carroll made only scant considerations of his conception of logic. Based on the small considerations found throughout the study and on the constant claim of the social utility of logic, it is suggested that Carroll is close to the so-called pragmatic position, which considers a logic as an instrument of regulation of discourse. |
id |
UFSM_b6f9ee9efb0fa991b6f1df5663bad5c2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/12721 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
2018-03-15T15:09:09Z2018-03-15T15:09:09Z2017-03-10http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/12721The present dissertation presents an examination of the Carrollian logic through the reconstruction of its syllogistic theory. Lewis Carroll was one of the main responsible for the dissemination of logic during the nineteenth century, but most of his logical writings remained unknown until a posthumous publication of 1977. The reconstruction of the Carrollian syllogistic theory was based on the comparison of the two books on author's logic, "The Game of Logic" and "Symbolic Logic". The analysis of the Carrollian syllogistics starts from a study of the historical context of development of the logic and the developments of syllogistics previous to the contribution of the author. Situated in the historical period of algebraical logic, Carrollian syllogistics is characterized as a conservative extension of the Aristotelian syllogistics, the main innovation is the use of negative terms and the introduction of a diagrammatic method suitable for the representation of negative terms. The diagrammatic method of the Carrollian syllogistics presents advances in relation to the methods of Euler and Venn. The use of negative terms also requires a redefinition of the notion of syllogism, simplifying and expanding the amount of arguments amenable to logical treatment. Carroll does not use four, but only three categorical propositions in his syllogistic, with interpretation of existential presuppositions congruent with a syntactic-existential reading. Carrollian syllogistics uses some techniques found in the work of algebraists of logic and also made the same confusions between notions of "class" and "member" that were common in the period. Convinced of the social utility of logic and dedicated to popularize it, Carroll priorized a creation of new didactics for the teaching of logic in his works, where he can include his diagrammatic method of solving syllogisms. Carroll made only scant considerations of his conception of logic. Based on the small considerations found throughout the study and on the constant claim of the social utility of logic, it is suggested that Carroll is close to the so-called pragmatic position, which considers a logic as an instrument of regulation of discourse.A presente dissertação apresenta um exame da lógica carrolliana através da reconstrução de sua teoria silogística. Lewis Carroll foi um dos principais responsáveis pela divulgação da lógica durante o século XIX, mas grande parte de seus escritos lógicos permaneceram desconhecidos até uma publicação póstuma de 1977 e ainda são objeto de poucos estudos. A reconstrução da teoria silogística carrolliana se deu pelo cotejamento dos dois livros sobre lógica do autor, a saber, “The Game of Logic” e “Symbolic Logic”. A análise da silogistica carrolliana parte de um estudo do contexto histórico de desenvolvimento da lógica no qual as obras se situam e dos desenvolvimentos da silogística anteriores ao aporte do autor. Situado no período histórico da álgebra da lógica, a silogística carrolliana caracteriza-se como uma extensão conservativa da silogística aristotélica, cuja principal inovação consiste no uso de termos negativos e na introdução de um método diagramático de resolução de silogismos adequado à representação destes termos. O método diagramático da silogística carrolliana apresenta avanços em relação aos métodos de Euler e Venn. O uso de termos negativos também exigiu do autor uma redefinição da noção de silogismo, simplificando-a e expandido a quantidade de argumentos passíveis de tratamento lógico. Carroll não utiliza quatro, mas apenas três proposições categóricas em sua silogística; com uma interpretação dos pressupostos existenciais congruente com a leitura sintático-existencial. A silogística carrolliana utiliza algumas técnicas similares àquelas encontradas no trabalho de algebristas da lógica que lhe foram contemporâneos e, enquanto um lógico de seu tempo, também cometeu as mesmas confusões entre as noções de “classe” e “membro” que eram comuns no período. Convicto da utilidade social da lógica e dedicado a popularizá-la, Carroll priorizou a criação de novas didáticas para o ensino da lógica em seus trabalhos, onde pode-se incluir o seu método diagramático de resolução de silogismos, originalmente apresentado como um jogo de peças. Carroll fez apenas escassas considerações acerca de sua concepção de lógica. Baseado nas pequenas considerações encontradas ao longo do estudo e na constante reivindicação da utilidade social da lógica, sugere-se que Carroll estaria próximo da posição atualmente chamada de pragmática, que considera a lógica como um instrumento de regulamentação do discurso.porUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUFSMBrasilFilosofiaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLógicaSilogismoLewis CarrollLogicSyllogismCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAA lógica de Lewis CarrollThe logic of Lewis Carrollinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisSautter, Frank Thomashttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760Secco, Gisele Dalvahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1081009950294509Teixeira, Rafael Montoitohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8190742787917024http://lattes.cnpq.br/9999572531550043Lindemann, John Lennon7001000000046007b4df9b2-c023-4806-81a9-f4f3371e5518c31b99b4-597e-4c62-8ea0-e575dbd1b47c787ed2f2-c295-4ff7-b919-40bb75cd66d826afcc1b-78ea-42f7-a29a-016ade39b5a6reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8804http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/12721/2/license_rdfc1efe8e24d7281448e873be30ea326ffMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/12721/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53ORIGINALDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdfDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdfDissertação de Mestradoapplication/pdf704504http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/12721/1/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf8c9b0c49040c8255711cd340e961e374MD51TEXTDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.txtDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain236177http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/12721/4/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.txtd38af4c5d3cb10d2d573293dd6ef3ac7MD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4053http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/12721/5/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.jpgbb5adc398fb549651ce278e8fe0ae99eMD551/127212018-03-15 12:09:09.873oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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 Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2018-03-15T15:09:09Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
A lógica de Lewis Carroll |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
The logic of Lewis Carroll |
title |
A lógica de Lewis Carroll |
spellingShingle |
A lógica de Lewis Carroll Lindemann, John Lennon Lógica Silogismo Lewis Carroll Logic Syllogism CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
A lógica de Lewis Carroll |
title_full |
A lógica de Lewis Carroll |
title_fullStr |
A lógica de Lewis Carroll |
title_full_unstemmed |
A lógica de Lewis Carroll |
title_sort |
A lógica de Lewis Carroll |
author |
Lindemann, John Lennon |
author_facet |
Lindemann, John Lennon |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Sautter, Frank Thomas |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Secco, Gisele Dalva |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1081009950294509 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Rafael Montoito |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8190742787917024 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9999572531550043 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lindemann, John Lennon |
contributor_str_mv |
Sautter, Frank Thomas Secco, Gisele Dalva Teixeira, Rafael Montoito |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lógica Silogismo Lewis Carroll |
topic |
Lógica Silogismo Lewis Carroll Logic Syllogism CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Logic Syllogism |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
The present dissertation presents an examination of the Carrollian logic through the reconstruction of its syllogistic theory. Lewis Carroll was one of the main responsible for the dissemination of logic during the nineteenth century, but most of his logical writings remained unknown until a posthumous publication of 1977. The reconstruction of the Carrollian syllogistic theory was based on the comparison of the two books on author's logic, "The Game of Logic" and "Symbolic Logic". The analysis of the Carrollian syllogistics starts from a study of the historical context of development of the logic and the developments of syllogistics previous to the contribution of the author. Situated in the historical period of algebraical logic, Carrollian syllogistics is characterized as a conservative extension of the Aristotelian syllogistics, the main innovation is the use of negative terms and the introduction of a diagrammatic method suitable for the representation of negative terms. The diagrammatic method of the Carrollian syllogistics presents advances in relation to the methods of Euler and Venn. The use of negative terms also requires a redefinition of the notion of syllogism, simplifying and expanding the amount of arguments amenable to logical treatment. Carroll does not use four, but only three categorical propositions in his syllogistic, with interpretation of existential presuppositions congruent with a syntactic-existential reading. Carrollian syllogistics uses some techniques found in the work of algebraists of logic and also made the same confusions between notions of "class" and "member" that were common in the period. Convinced of the social utility of logic and dedicated to popularize it, Carroll priorized a creation of new didactics for the teaching of logic in his works, where he can include his diagrammatic method of solving syllogisms. Carroll made only scant considerations of his conception of logic. Based on the small considerations found throughout the study and on the constant claim of the social utility of logic, it is suggested that Carroll is close to the so-called pragmatic position, which considers a logic as an instrument of regulation of discourse. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-03-10 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-15T15:09:09Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-15T15:09:09Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/12721 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/12721 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
700100000004 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
7b4df9b2-c023-4806-81a9-f4f3371e5518 c31b99b4-597e-4c62-8ea0-e575dbd1b47c 787ed2f2-c295-4ff7-b919-40bb75cd66d8 26afcc1b-78ea-42f7-a29a-016ade39b5a6 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Filosofia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/12721/2/license_rdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/12721/3/license.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/12721/1/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/12721/4/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/12721/5/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_LINDEMANN_JOHN.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
c1efe8e24d7281448e873be30ea326ff 2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df 8c9b0c49040c8255711cd340e961e374 d38af4c5d3cb10d2d573293dd6ef3ac7 bb5adc398fb549651ce278e8fe0ae99e |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1801485316015521792 |