Brazilian consumers’ perception of edible insects
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019001000752 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: It is estimated that by 2050 the world population will be 9 billion people; and therefore, the need for alternative sources of protein is inevitable, since conventional sources, such as beef, pork and poultry, will not be sufficient to meet the demand of population growth. Food that includes alternative sources of protein, such as insects, is a reality in countries of Latin America, Asia, Australia, Europe and Africa. This research presents the results of an exploratory study that analysed the food profile of 1,619 consumers in the five Brazilian regions (North, Northeast, Midwest, Southeast and South) as well as their perception, motivation and preferred form of edible insects. The data were analysed by cross-tabulation and expressed as frequencies. Our results show that women are more reluctant than men to consume insects. In general, there is a preference for consumption of insects in the form of flour. However, those with more familiarity with this type of consumption prefer the whole insect. Most Brazilian consumers have no opinion about the safety of consuming insects; however, consumers with higher levels of education and familiarity consider it safe. |
id |
UFSM-2_2613bd97e2365c9b733a0118b2b780dc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782019001000752 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Brazilian consumers’ perception of edible insectsentomophagyfood preferencefood profilefood safetyneophobiaABSTRACT: It is estimated that by 2050 the world population will be 9 billion people; and therefore, the need for alternative sources of protein is inevitable, since conventional sources, such as beef, pork and poultry, will not be sufficient to meet the demand of population growth. Food that includes alternative sources of protein, such as insects, is a reality in countries of Latin America, Asia, Australia, Europe and Africa. This research presents the results of an exploratory study that analysed the food profile of 1,619 consumers in the five Brazilian regions (North, Northeast, Midwest, Southeast and South) as well as their perception, motivation and preferred form of edible insects. The data were analysed by cross-tabulation and expressed as frequencies. Our results show that women are more reluctant than men to consume insects. In general, there is a preference for consumption of insects in the form of flour. However, those with more familiarity with this type of consumption prefer the whole insect. Most Brazilian consumers have no opinion about the safety of consuming insects; however, consumers with higher levels of education and familiarity consider it safe.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019001000752Ciência Rural v.49 n.10 2019reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20180960info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchardong,Igor SulzbacherFreiberg,Joice AlineSantana,Natielo AlmeidaRichards,Neila Silvia Pereira dos Santoseng2019-09-19T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian consumers’ perception of edible insects |
title |
Brazilian consumers’ perception of edible insects |
spellingShingle |
Brazilian consumers’ perception of edible insects Schardong,Igor Sulzbacher entomophagy food preference food profile food safety neophobia |
title_short |
Brazilian consumers’ perception of edible insects |
title_full |
Brazilian consumers’ perception of edible insects |
title_fullStr |
Brazilian consumers’ perception of edible insects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brazilian consumers’ perception of edible insects |
title_sort |
Brazilian consumers’ perception of edible insects |
author |
Schardong,Igor Sulzbacher |
author_facet |
Schardong,Igor Sulzbacher Freiberg,Joice Aline Santana,Natielo Almeida Richards,Neila Silvia Pereira dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Freiberg,Joice Aline Santana,Natielo Almeida Richards,Neila Silvia Pereira dos Santos |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schardong,Igor Sulzbacher Freiberg,Joice Aline Santana,Natielo Almeida Richards,Neila Silvia Pereira dos Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
entomophagy food preference food profile food safety neophobia |
topic |
entomophagy food preference food profile food safety neophobia |
description |
ABSTRACT: It is estimated that by 2050 the world population will be 9 billion people; and therefore, the need for alternative sources of protein is inevitable, since conventional sources, such as beef, pork and poultry, will not be sufficient to meet the demand of population growth. Food that includes alternative sources of protein, such as insects, is a reality in countries of Latin America, Asia, Australia, Europe and Africa. This research presents the results of an exploratory study that analysed the food profile of 1,619 consumers in the five Brazilian regions (North, Northeast, Midwest, Southeast and South) as well as their perception, motivation and preferred form of edible insects. The data were analysed by cross-tabulation and expressed as frequencies. Our results show that women are more reluctant than men to consume insects. In general, there is a preference for consumption of insects in the form of flour. However, those with more familiarity with this type of consumption prefer the whole insect. Most Brazilian consumers have no opinion about the safety of consuming insects; however, consumers with higher levels of education and familiarity consider it safe. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019001000752 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019001000752 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20180960 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.49 n.10 2019 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140553993289728 |