Comparison of microbial load in immersion chilling water and poultry carcasses after 8, 16 and 24 working hours
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782010000700019 |
Resumo: | Poultry processing facilities are known for using a great amount of water, which is mainly used on carcasses chilling stage. In Brazil, meat regulations state that each chiller tank must be emptied, cleaned and sanitized every 8 working hours. The aim of the current study was to assess the microbial load of chiller water used in poultry immersion chilling system after 8, 16 and 24 working hours in order to evaluate the reduction of water changes and chiller sanitization. Conventional physicochemical and microbiological assays were done in water supply samples (n=69) to suppress interferences caused by freshwater addition; pre chilled (n=345) post chilled carcasses (n=345) and chiller water samples of the last stage (n=69). The results showed no significant differences on microbial load samples between the three shifts suggesting that the proposed reduction may be secure and reduces the volume of wastewater that would impact the environment, besides improving the rational use of processing time. |
id |
UFSM-2_700e39664767f6a3048848148697a181 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782010000700019 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of microbial load in immersion chilling water and poultry carcasses after 8, 16 and 24 working hourspoultry slaughterhouseschiller water microbiological loadimmersion chillingPoultry processing facilities are known for using a great amount of water, which is mainly used on carcasses chilling stage. In Brazil, meat regulations state that each chiller tank must be emptied, cleaned and sanitized every 8 working hours. The aim of the current study was to assess the microbial load of chiller water used in poultry immersion chilling system after 8, 16 and 24 working hours in order to evaluate the reduction of water changes and chiller sanitization. Conventional physicochemical and microbiological assays were done in water supply samples (n=69) to suppress interferences caused by freshwater addition; pre chilled (n=345) post chilled carcasses (n=345) and chiller water samples of the last stage (n=69). The results showed no significant differences on microbial load samples between the three shifts suggesting that the proposed reduction may be secure and reduces the volume of wastewater that would impact the environment, besides improving the rational use of processing time.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2010-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782010000700019Ciência Rural v.40 n.7 2010reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/S0103-84782010005000115info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCavani,RicardoSchocken-Iturrino,Ruben PabloGarcia,Teresa Cristina Fernandes LopesOliveira,Adriana Cássia deeng2010-09-08T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of microbial load in immersion chilling water and poultry carcasses after 8, 16 and 24 working hours |
title |
Comparison of microbial load in immersion chilling water and poultry carcasses after 8, 16 and 24 working hours |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of microbial load in immersion chilling water and poultry carcasses after 8, 16 and 24 working hours Cavani,Ricardo poultry slaughterhouses chiller water microbiological load immersion chilling |
title_short |
Comparison of microbial load in immersion chilling water and poultry carcasses after 8, 16 and 24 working hours |
title_full |
Comparison of microbial load in immersion chilling water and poultry carcasses after 8, 16 and 24 working hours |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of microbial load in immersion chilling water and poultry carcasses after 8, 16 and 24 working hours |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of microbial load in immersion chilling water and poultry carcasses after 8, 16 and 24 working hours |
title_sort |
Comparison of microbial load in immersion chilling water and poultry carcasses after 8, 16 and 24 working hours |
author |
Cavani,Ricardo |
author_facet |
Cavani,Ricardo Schocken-Iturrino,Ruben Pablo Garcia,Teresa Cristina Fernandes Lopes Oliveira,Adriana Cássia de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schocken-Iturrino,Ruben Pablo Garcia,Teresa Cristina Fernandes Lopes Oliveira,Adriana Cássia de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cavani,Ricardo Schocken-Iturrino,Ruben Pablo Garcia,Teresa Cristina Fernandes Lopes Oliveira,Adriana Cássia de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
poultry slaughterhouses chiller water microbiological load immersion chilling |
topic |
poultry slaughterhouses chiller water microbiological load immersion chilling |
description |
Poultry processing facilities are known for using a great amount of water, which is mainly used on carcasses chilling stage. In Brazil, meat regulations state that each chiller tank must be emptied, cleaned and sanitized every 8 working hours. The aim of the current study was to assess the microbial load of chiller water used in poultry immersion chilling system after 8, 16 and 24 working hours in order to evaluate the reduction of water changes and chiller sanitization. Conventional physicochemical and microbiological assays were done in water supply samples (n=69) to suppress interferences caused by freshwater addition; pre chilled (n=345) post chilled carcasses (n=345) and chiller water samples of the last stage (n=69). The results showed no significant differences on microbial load samples between the three shifts suggesting that the proposed reduction may be secure and reduces the volume of wastewater that would impact the environment, besides improving the rational use of processing time. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782010000700019 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782010000700019 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-84782010005000115 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.40 n.7 2010 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140537406914560 |