South Brazilian farmers’ perceptions concerning sheep tail docking

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Stamm,Fabiana de Orte
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Molento,Marcelo Beltrão, Molento,Carla Forte Maiolino
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019000400652
Resumo: ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to better understand farmers’ perceptions regarding sheep welfare and procedures concerning the tail docking of sheep in the state of Parana, Southern Brazil. The study was carried out via telephone interviews or personally with 146 sheep farmers. Twenty-eight farmers (19.2%) did not tail dock; the main reasons given were because they raised short-hair sheep breeds. One hundred and eighteen farmers docked their sheep tails (80.8%). The main reasons given were hygiene (61.0%), facilitated mating (42.4%), breed standards (29.7%), and esthetics (26.3%). Rubber ring was the main method used for tail docking. Although farmers in Parana recognized that sheep are sentient animals and that tail docking causes pain, anesthesia was used by only six (5.1%) farmers during the procedure of tail docking. Our results showed that farmers’ opinions on sheep tail docking are divergent. Farmers who perform tail docking must be encouraged to use anesthesia and analgesia, and to ponder on the real need for the practice. This statement seems especially relevant considering the fact that some farmers reported the viability of maintaining wool sheep with undocked tails and that they recognized the suffering involved in this procedure.
id UFSM-2_77f0381c9d65ba05f27560f48460a7f7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-84782019000400652
network_acronym_str UFSM-2
network_name_str Ciência rural (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling South Brazilian farmers’ perceptions concerning sheep tail dockinganimal welfarelambOvis ariespainrubber ringABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to better understand farmers’ perceptions regarding sheep welfare and procedures concerning the tail docking of sheep in the state of Parana, Southern Brazil. The study was carried out via telephone interviews or personally with 146 sheep farmers. Twenty-eight farmers (19.2%) did not tail dock; the main reasons given were because they raised short-hair sheep breeds. One hundred and eighteen farmers docked their sheep tails (80.8%). The main reasons given were hygiene (61.0%), facilitated mating (42.4%), breed standards (29.7%), and esthetics (26.3%). Rubber ring was the main method used for tail docking. Although farmers in Parana recognized that sheep are sentient animals and that tail docking causes pain, anesthesia was used by only six (5.1%) farmers during the procedure of tail docking. Our results showed that farmers’ opinions on sheep tail docking are divergent. Farmers who perform tail docking must be encouraged to use anesthesia and analgesia, and to ponder on the real need for the practice. This statement seems especially relevant considering the fact that some farmers reported the viability of maintaining wool sheep with undocked tails and that they recognized the suffering involved in this procedure.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019000400652Ciência Rural v.49 n.4 2019reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20180571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStamm,Fabiana de OrteMolento,Marcelo BeltrãoMolento,Carla Forte Maiolinoeng2019-04-03T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv South Brazilian farmers’ perceptions concerning sheep tail docking
title South Brazilian farmers’ perceptions concerning sheep tail docking
spellingShingle South Brazilian farmers’ perceptions concerning sheep tail docking
Stamm,Fabiana de Orte
animal welfare
lamb
Ovis aries
pain
rubber ring
title_short South Brazilian farmers’ perceptions concerning sheep tail docking
title_full South Brazilian farmers’ perceptions concerning sheep tail docking
title_fullStr South Brazilian farmers’ perceptions concerning sheep tail docking
title_full_unstemmed South Brazilian farmers’ perceptions concerning sheep tail docking
title_sort South Brazilian farmers’ perceptions concerning sheep tail docking
author Stamm,Fabiana de Orte
author_facet Stamm,Fabiana de Orte
Molento,Marcelo Beltrão
Molento,Carla Forte Maiolino
author_role author
author2 Molento,Marcelo Beltrão
Molento,Carla Forte Maiolino
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Stamm,Fabiana de Orte
Molento,Marcelo Beltrão
Molento,Carla Forte Maiolino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv animal welfare
lamb
Ovis aries
pain
rubber ring
topic animal welfare
lamb
Ovis aries
pain
rubber ring
description ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to better understand farmers’ perceptions regarding sheep welfare and procedures concerning the tail docking of sheep in the state of Parana, Southern Brazil. The study was carried out via telephone interviews or personally with 146 sheep farmers. Twenty-eight farmers (19.2%) did not tail dock; the main reasons given were because they raised short-hair sheep breeds. One hundred and eighteen farmers docked their sheep tails (80.8%). The main reasons given were hygiene (61.0%), facilitated mating (42.4%), breed standards (29.7%), and esthetics (26.3%). Rubber ring was the main method used for tail docking. Although farmers in Parana recognized that sheep are sentient animals and that tail docking causes pain, anesthesia was used by only six (5.1%) farmers during the procedure of tail docking. Our results showed that farmers’ opinions on sheep tail docking are divergent. Farmers who perform tail docking must be encouraged to use anesthesia and analgesia, and to ponder on the real need for the practice. This statement seems especially relevant considering the fact that some farmers reported the viability of maintaining wool sheep with undocked tails and that they recognized the suffering involved in this procedure.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019000400652
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019000400652
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-8478cr20180571
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural v.49 n.4 2019
reponame:Ciência Rural
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Rural
collection Ciência Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1749140553524576256