New insights into genomic selection through population-based non-parametric prediction methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Leísa Pires
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Azevedo, Camila Ferreira, Resende, Marcos Deon Deon Vilela de, Silva, Fabyano Fonseca e, Suela, Matheus Massariol, Nascimento, Moysés, Viana, José Marcelo Soriano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/157011
Resumo: Genome-wide selection (GWS) is based on a large number of markers widely distributed throughout the genome. Genome-wide selection provides for the estimation of the effect of each molecular marker on the phenotype, thereby allowing for the capture of all genes affecting the quantitative traits of interest. The main statistical tools applied to GWS are based on random regression or dimensionality reduction methods. In this study a new non-parametric method, called Delta-p was proposed, which was then compared to the Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (G-BLUP) method. Furthermore, a new selection index combining the genetic values obtained by the G-BLUP and Delta-p, named Delta-p/G-BLUP methods, was proposed. The efficiency of the proposed methods was evaluated through both simulation and real studies. The simulated data consisted of eight scenarios comprising a combination of two levels of heritability, two genetic architectures and two dominance status (absence and complete dominance). Each scenario was simulated ten times. All methods were applied to a real dataset of Asian rice (Oryza sativa) aiming to increase the efficiency of a current breeding program. The methods were compared as regards accuracy of prediction (simulation data) or predictive ability (real dataset), bias and recovery of the true genomic heritability. The results indicated that the proposed Delta-p/G-BLUP index outperformed the other methods in both prediction accuracy and predictive ability.
id USP-18_faaf9b9ef8a81414df29e4b9e225e8e6
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/157011
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling New insights into genomic selection through population-based non-parametric prediction methodsgenomic predictionselection indexgenetic gainasian riceGenome-wide selection (GWS) is based on a large number of markers widely distributed throughout the genome. Genome-wide selection provides for the estimation of the effect of each molecular marker on the phenotype, thereby allowing for the capture of all genes affecting the quantitative traits of interest. The main statistical tools applied to GWS are based on random regression or dimensionality reduction methods. In this study a new non-parametric method, called Delta-p was proposed, which was then compared to the Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (G-BLUP) method. Furthermore, a new selection index combining the genetic values obtained by the G-BLUP and Delta-p, named Delta-p/G-BLUP methods, was proposed. The efficiency of the proposed methods was evaluated through both simulation and real studies. The simulated data consisted of eight scenarios comprising a combination of two levels of heritability, two genetic architectures and two dominance status (absence and complete dominance). Each scenario was simulated ten times. All methods were applied to a real dataset of Asian rice (Oryza sativa) aiming to increase the efficiency of a current breeding program. The methods were compared as regards accuracy of prediction (simulation data) or predictive ability (real dataset), bias and recovery of the true genomic heritability. The results indicated that the proposed Delta-p/G-BLUP index outperformed the other methods in both prediction accuracy and predictive ability.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2019-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/15701110.1590/1678-992x-2017-0351Scientia Agricola; v. 76 n. 4 (2019); 290-298Scientia Agricola; Vol. 76 Núm. 4 (2019); 290-298Scientia Agricola; Vol. 76 No. 4 (2019); 290-2981678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/157011/152406Copyright (c) 2019 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Leísa PiresAzevedo, Camila FerreiraResende, Marcos Deon Deon Vilela deSilva, Fabyano Fonseca eSuela, Matheus MassariolNascimento, MoysésViana, José Marcelo Soriano2019-04-17T17:38:13Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/157011Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2019-04-17T17:38:13Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv New insights into genomic selection through population-based non-parametric prediction methods
title New insights into genomic selection through population-based non-parametric prediction methods
spellingShingle New insights into genomic selection through population-based non-parametric prediction methods
Lima, Leísa Pires
genomic prediction
selection index
genetic gain
asian rice
title_short New insights into genomic selection through population-based non-parametric prediction methods
title_full New insights into genomic selection through population-based non-parametric prediction methods
title_fullStr New insights into genomic selection through population-based non-parametric prediction methods
title_full_unstemmed New insights into genomic selection through population-based non-parametric prediction methods
title_sort New insights into genomic selection through population-based non-parametric prediction methods
author Lima, Leísa Pires
author_facet Lima, Leísa Pires
Azevedo, Camila Ferreira
Resende, Marcos Deon Deon Vilela de
Silva, Fabyano Fonseca e
Suela, Matheus Massariol
Nascimento, Moysés
Viana, José Marcelo Soriano
author_role author
author2 Azevedo, Camila Ferreira
Resende, Marcos Deon Deon Vilela de
Silva, Fabyano Fonseca e
Suela, Matheus Massariol
Nascimento, Moysés
Viana, José Marcelo Soriano
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Leísa Pires
Azevedo, Camila Ferreira
Resende, Marcos Deon Deon Vilela de
Silva, Fabyano Fonseca e
Suela, Matheus Massariol
Nascimento, Moysés
Viana, José Marcelo Soriano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv genomic prediction
selection index
genetic gain
asian rice
topic genomic prediction
selection index
genetic gain
asian rice
description Genome-wide selection (GWS) is based on a large number of markers widely distributed throughout the genome. Genome-wide selection provides for the estimation of the effect of each molecular marker on the phenotype, thereby allowing for the capture of all genes affecting the quantitative traits of interest. The main statistical tools applied to GWS are based on random regression or dimensionality reduction methods. In this study a new non-parametric method, called Delta-p was proposed, which was then compared to the Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (G-BLUP) method. Furthermore, a new selection index combining the genetic values obtained by the G-BLUP and Delta-p, named Delta-p/G-BLUP methods, was proposed. The efficiency of the proposed methods was evaluated through both simulation and real studies. The simulated data consisted of eight scenarios comprising a combination of two levels of heritability, two genetic architectures and two dominance status (absence and complete dominance). Each scenario was simulated ten times. All methods were applied to a real dataset of Asian rice (Oryza sativa) aiming to increase the efficiency of a current breeding program. The methods were compared as regards accuracy of prediction (simulation data) or predictive ability (real dataset), bias and recovery of the true genomic heritability. The results indicated that the proposed Delta-p/G-BLUP index outperformed the other methods in both prediction accuracy and predictive ability.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/157011
10.1590/1678-992x-2017-0351
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/157011
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-992x-2017-0351
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/157011/152406
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Scientia Agricola
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Scientia Agricola
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 76 n. 4 (2019); 290-298
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 76 Núm. 4 (2019); 290-298
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 76 No. 4 (2019); 290-298
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222793967599616