Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bruno, Simara Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Matos, Ubirajara Aluízio de Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência Florestal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222
Resumo: The knowledge of hundreds of traditional Brazilian communities about the use of native plants and animals as well as the country's biodiversity attracts biopiracy. These resources are being exploited by companies for the manufacture of medicines, foods, chemicals and cosmetics. In 2015 Brazil sanctioned the New Biodiversity Law, Law No. 13,123 / 2015. Is the benefit sharing for the ‘quilombola’ communities (ex-slave communites) guaranteed by this New Law? The article aims to analyze this law, checking if there have been advances in relation to the previous legislation, Provisional Measure No. 2.186-16 / 2001. The research, based on literature review, had a bibliographic and exploratory character. In addition to the review, a questionnaire with semi-structured questions was sent to 30 ‘quilombola’ communities, but only two of them answered, making it impossible to ascertain whether this law meets the aspirations of these communities with regard to benefit sharing. The study concluded that, despite bringing innovations, the New Biodiversity Law does not prevent biopiracy from continuing.
id UFSM-6_29004af2c184628b00e29534c6e4aba2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34222
network_acronym_str UFSM-6
network_name_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it?Benefícios da biodiversidade para as comunidades tradicionais: a nova legislação os sustenta?BiopiracyBenefit sharing“Quilombos”BiopiratariaRepartição de benefíciosQuilombosThe knowledge of hundreds of traditional Brazilian communities about the use of native plants and animals as well as the country's biodiversity attracts biopiracy. These resources are being exploited by companies for the manufacture of medicines, foods, chemicals and cosmetics. In 2015 Brazil sanctioned the New Biodiversity Law, Law No. 13,123 / 2015. Is the benefit sharing for the ‘quilombola’ communities (ex-slave communites) guaranteed by this New Law? The article aims to analyze this law, checking if there have been advances in relation to the previous legislation, Provisional Measure No. 2.186-16 / 2001. The research, based on literature review, had a bibliographic and exploratory character. In addition to the review, a questionnaire with semi-structured questions was sent to 30 ‘quilombola’ communities, but only two of them answered, making it impossible to ascertain whether this law meets the aspirations of these communities with regard to benefit sharing. The study concluded that, despite bringing innovations, the New Biodiversity Law does not prevent biopiracy from continuing.Os conhecimentos de centenas de comunidades tradicionais brasileiras sobre o uso de plantas e animais nativos, bem como a biodiversidade do país atraem a biopirataria. Esses recursos vêm sendo explorados por empresas para fabricação de medicamentos, alimentos, químicos e cosméticos. Em 2015, o Brasil sancionou a Nova Lei da Biodiversidade, Lei nº 13.123/2015. A repartição de benefícios para as comunidades quilombolas fica garantida com essa Nova Lei? Este artigo tem o objetivo de analisar essa Lei, verificando se houve avanços em relação à legislação anterior, Medida Provisória nº 2.186-16/2001. A pesquisa, com base em revisão da literatura, teve caráter bibliográfico e exploratório. Além da revisão, foi encaminhado um questionário com perguntas semiestruturadas para 30 comunidades quilombolas, porém somente duas destas responderam, inviabilizando constatar se essa lei vem atender aos anseios dessas comunidades no que diz respeito à repartição dos benefícios. O estudo permitiu concluir que, apesar de trazer inovações, a Nova Lei de Biodiversidade não impede que a biopirataria continue ocorrendo. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/3422210.5902/1980509834222Ciência Florestal; Vol. 31 No. 2 (2021); 998-1019Ciência Florestal; v. 31 n. 2 (2021); 998-10191980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222/htmlCopyright (c) 2021 Ciência Florestalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBruno, Simara FerreiraMatos, Ubirajara Aluízio de Oliveira2021-08-24T13:31:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34222Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2021-08-24T13:31:11Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it?
Benefícios da biodiversidade para as comunidades tradicionais: a nova legislação os sustenta?
title Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it?
spellingShingle Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it?
Bruno, Simara Ferreira
Biopiracy
Benefit sharing
“Quilombos”
Biopirataria
Repartição de benefícios
Quilombos
title_short Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it?
title_full Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it?
title_fullStr Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it?
title_full_unstemmed Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it?
title_sort Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it?
author Bruno, Simara Ferreira
author_facet Bruno, Simara Ferreira
Matos, Ubirajara Aluízio de Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Matos, Ubirajara Aluízio de Oliveira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bruno, Simara Ferreira
Matos, Ubirajara Aluízio de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biopiracy
Benefit sharing
“Quilombos”
Biopirataria
Repartição de benefícios
Quilombos
topic Biopiracy
Benefit sharing
“Quilombos”
Biopirataria
Repartição de benefícios
Quilombos
description The knowledge of hundreds of traditional Brazilian communities about the use of native plants and animals as well as the country's biodiversity attracts biopiracy. These resources are being exploited by companies for the manufacture of medicines, foods, chemicals and cosmetics. In 2015 Brazil sanctioned the New Biodiversity Law, Law No. 13,123 / 2015. Is the benefit sharing for the ‘quilombola’ communities (ex-slave communites) guaranteed by this New Law? The article aims to analyze this law, checking if there have been advances in relation to the previous legislation, Provisional Measure No. 2.186-16 / 2001. The research, based on literature review, had a bibliographic and exploratory character. In addition to the review, a questionnaire with semi-structured questions was sent to 30 ‘quilombola’ communities, but only two of them answered, making it impossible to ascertain whether this law meets the aspirations of these communities with regard to benefit sharing. The study concluded that, despite bringing innovations, the New Biodiversity Law does not prevent biopiracy from continuing.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222
10.5902/1980509834222
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1980509834222
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222/pdf
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222/html
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência Florestal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência Florestal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal; Vol. 31 No. 2 (2021); 998-1019
Ciência Florestal; v. 31 n. 2 (2021); 998-1019
1980-5098
0103-9954
reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
collection Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br
_version_ 1799944133969707008