Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Florestal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222 |
Resumo: | The knowledge of hundreds of traditional Brazilian communities about the use of native plants and animals as well as the country's biodiversity attracts biopiracy. These resources are being exploited by companies for the manufacture of medicines, foods, chemicals and cosmetics. In 2015 Brazil sanctioned the New Biodiversity Law, Law No. 13,123 / 2015. Is the benefit sharing for the ‘quilombola’ communities (ex-slave communites) guaranteed by this New Law? The article aims to analyze this law, checking if there have been advances in relation to the previous legislation, Provisional Measure No. 2.186-16 / 2001. The research, based on literature review, had a bibliographic and exploratory character. In addition to the review, a questionnaire with semi-structured questions was sent to 30 ‘quilombola’ communities, but only two of them answered, making it impossible to ascertain whether this law meets the aspirations of these communities with regard to benefit sharing. The study concluded that, despite bringing innovations, the New Biodiversity Law does not prevent biopiracy from continuing. |
id |
UFSM-6_29004af2c184628b00e29534c6e4aba2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34222 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-6 |
network_name_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it?Benefícios da biodiversidade para as comunidades tradicionais: a nova legislação os sustenta?BiopiracyBenefit sharing“Quilombos”BiopiratariaRepartição de benefíciosQuilombosThe knowledge of hundreds of traditional Brazilian communities about the use of native plants and animals as well as the country's biodiversity attracts biopiracy. These resources are being exploited by companies for the manufacture of medicines, foods, chemicals and cosmetics. In 2015 Brazil sanctioned the New Biodiversity Law, Law No. 13,123 / 2015. Is the benefit sharing for the ‘quilombola’ communities (ex-slave communites) guaranteed by this New Law? The article aims to analyze this law, checking if there have been advances in relation to the previous legislation, Provisional Measure No. 2.186-16 / 2001. The research, based on literature review, had a bibliographic and exploratory character. In addition to the review, a questionnaire with semi-structured questions was sent to 30 ‘quilombola’ communities, but only two of them answered, making it impossible to ascertain whether this law meets the aspirations of these communities with regard to benefit sharing. The study concluded that, despite bringing innovations, the New Biodiversity Law does not prevent biopiracy from continuing.Os conhecimentos de centenas de comunidades tradicionais brasileiras sobre o uso de plantas e animais nativos, bem como a biodiversidade do país atraem a biopirataria. Esses recursos vêm sendo explorados por empresas para fabricação de medicamentos, alimentos, químicos e cosméticos. Em 2015, o Brasil sancionou a Nova Lei da Biodiversidade, Lei nº 13.123/2015. A repartição de benefícios para as comunidades quilombolas fica garantida com essa Nova Lei? Este artigo tem o objetivo de analisar essa Lei, verificando se houve avanços em relação à legislação anterior, Medida Provisória nº 2.186-16/2001. A pesquisa, com base em revisão da literatura, teve caráter bibliográfico e exploratório. Além da revisão, foi encaminhado um questionário com perguntas semiestruturadas para 30 comunidades quilombolas, porém somente duas destas responderam, inviabilizando constatar se essa lei vem atender aos anseios dessas comunidades no que diz respeito à repartição dos benefícios. O estudo permitiu concluir que, apesar de trazer inovações, a Nova Lei de Biodiversidade não impede que a biopirataria continue ocorrendo. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/3422210.5902/1980509834222Ciência Florestal; Vol. 31 No. 2 (2021); 998-1019Ciência Florestal; v. 31 n. 2 (2021); 998-10191980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222/htmlCopyright (c) 2021 Ciência Florestalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBruno, Simara FerreiraMatos, Ubirajara Aluízio de Oliveira2021-08-24T13:31:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34222Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2021-08-24T13:31:11Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it? Benefícios da biodiversidade para as comunidades tradicionais: a nova legislação os sustenta? |
title |
Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it? |
spellingShingle |
Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it? Bruno, Simara Ferreira Biopiracy Benefit sharing “Quilombos” Biopirataria Repartição de benefícios Quilombos |
title_short |
Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it? |
title_full |
Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it? |
title_fullStr |
Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it? |
title_sort |
Benefits of biodiversity for traditional communities: do the new legislation sustain it? |
author |
Bruno, Simara Ferreira |
author_facet |
Bruno, Simara Ferreira Matos, Ubirajara Aluízio de Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Matos, Ubirajara Aluízio de Oliveira |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bruno, Simara Ferreira Matos, Ubirajara Aluízio de Oliveira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biopiracy Benefit sharing “Quilombos” Biopirataria Repartição de benefícios Quilombos |
topic |
Biopiracy Benefit sharing “Quilombos” Biopirataria Repartição de benefícios Quilombos |
description |
The knowledge of hundreds of traditional Brazilian communities about the use of native plants and animals as well as the country's biodiversity attracts biopiracy. These resources are being exploited by companies for the manufacture of medicines, foods, chemicals and cosmetics. In 2015 Brazil sanctioned the New Biodiversity Law, Law No. 13,123 / 2015. Is the benefit sharing for the ‘quilombola’ communities (ex-slave communites) guaranteed by this New Law? The article aims to analyze this law, checking if there have been advances in relation to the previous legislation, Provisional Measure No. 2.186-16 / 2001. The research, based on literature review, had a bibliographic and exploratory character. In addition to the review, a questionnaire with semi-structured questions was sent to 30 ‘quilombola’ communities, but only two of them answered, making it impossible to ascertain whether this law meets the aspirations of these communities with regard to benefit sharing. The study concluded that, despite bringing innovations, the New Biodiversity Law does not prevent biopiracy from continuing. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222 10.5902/1980509834222 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5902/1980509834222 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222/pdf https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/34222/html |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência Florestal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência Florestal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal; Vol. 31 No. 2 (2021); 998-1019 Ciência Florestal; v. 31 n. 2 (2021); 998-1019 1980-5098 0103-9954 reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
collection |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br |
_version_ |
1799944133969707008 |