Biological inputs in promoting the growth of Bauhinia forficata Link. seedlings
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Florestal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/33322 |
Resumo: | Crops of medicinal plants demand careful attention with agrochemicals in order to avoid changing the composition of its active principles. Biological inputs are more recommended for this purpose. We tested the effects of Trichoderma and vermicompost on Bauhinia forficata Link. seedlings, one of the most exploited species for medicinal purposes. Two trials were installed in a completely randomized design with 40 replicates in a greenhouse in southern Brazil. We tested two Trichoderma asperelloides strains (T1 and T2) and two Trichoderma harzianum strains (T13 and T33) inoculated on substrate and a control treatment (substrate without inoculation). The vermicompost assay tested the proportions 0, 20, 40, 50, 60 and 80 % vermicompost (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 respectively). The variables of height, collar diameter, chlorophyll content and leaf number were evaluated at 45, 90 and 135 days after seeding. We analyzed seedlings survival, leaf area, shoot and root total dry biomass, and Dickson Quality Index at 135 days after seeding. Leaf area was submitted to the Tukey test (α = 0.05). Other variables did not present normality and homogeneity of variances and were compared by Kruskal-Wallis (α = 0.05). Biological inputs positively influenced the initial growth of Bauhinia forficata. Height, collar diameter, leaf area and try biomass (total, shoot and root) were higher in relation to control treatments for both trials. Among Trichoderma strains, T13 presented the best results in relation to T33. Seedlings produced with larger percentages of vermicompost (50, 60 and 80%) presented statistically higher development for height and collar diameter 90 days after seeding when compared to the control treatment. However, there was no clear pattern of differences between the other doses of this entry, requiring further dosing tests. Trichoderma and vermicompost showed to be promising for the production of Bauhinia forficata for medicinal purposes. |
id |
UFSM-6_fcd9661efee6aab35738e6ee80e41766 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33322 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-6 |
network_name_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Biological inputs in promoting the growth of Bauhinia forficata Link. seedlingsInsumos biológicos na promoção do crescimento de mudas de Bauhinia forficata Link.TrichodermaVermicompostMedicinal speciesPata-de-vacaFabaceaeTrichodermaVermicompostoEspécies medicinaisPata-de-vacaFabaceaeCrops of medicinal plants demand careful attention with agrochemicals in order to avoid changing the composition of its active principles. Biological inputs are more recommended for this purpose. We tested the effects of Trichoderma and vermicompost on Bauhinia forficata Link. seedlings, one of the most exploited species for medicinal purposes. Two trials were installed in a completely randomized design with 40 replicates in a greenhouse in southern Brazil. We tested two Trichoderma asperelloides strains (T1 and T2) and two Trichoderma harzianum strains (T13 and T33) inoculated on substrate and a control treatment (substrate without inoculation). The vermicompost assay tested the proportions 0, 20, 40, 50, 60 and 80 % vermicompost (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 respectively). The variables of height, collar diameter, chlorophyll content and leaf number were evaluated at 45, 90 and 135 days after seeding. We analyzed seedlings survival, leaf area, shoot and root total dry biomass, and Dickson Quality Index at 135 days after seeding. Leaf area was submitted to the Tukey test (α = 0.05). Other variables did not present normality and homogeneity of variances and were compared by Kruskal-Wallis (α = 0.05). Biological inputs positively influenced the initial growth of Bauhinia forficata. Height, collar diameter, leaf area and try biomass (total, shoot and root) were higher in relation to control treatments for both trials. Among Trichoderma strains, T13 presented the best results in relation to T33. Seedlings produced with larger percentages of vermicompost (50, 60 and 80%) presented statistically higher development for height and collar diameter 90 days after seeding when compared to the control treatment. However, there was no clear pattern of differences between the other doses of this entry, requiring further dosing tests. Trichoderma and vermicompost showed to be promising for the production of Bauhinia forficata for medicinal purposes.O cultivo de plantas medicinais exige cuidado na aplicação de agroquímicos a fim de evitar a alteração da composição de seus princípios ativos. Os insumos biológicos são mais recomendáveis para esse propósito. Foi testado o efeito de Trichoderma spp. e vermicomposto em mudas de Bauhinia forficata Link., uma das espécies florestais mais exploradas para fins medicinais, a partir de dois ensaios instalados em delineamento inteiramente casualizado com 40 repetições, em casa de vegetação. Testamos duas estirpes de Trichoderma asperelloides (T1 e T2) e duas estirpes de Trichoderma harzianum (T13 e T33) inoculadas em substrato e um tratamento controle (substrato sem inoculação). O ensaio com vermicomposto testou as proporções de 0, 20, 40, 50, 60 e 80 % de vermicomposto (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 e T6 respectivamente). As variáveis altura, diâmetro do coleto, teor de clorofila e número de folhas foram avaliadas aos 45, 90 e 135 dias após a semeadura. Analisamos também a sobrevivência, área foliar, biomassa seca total, da parte aérea e raízes e Índice de Qualidade de Dickson das mudas aos 135 dias após a semeadura. A área foliar foi submetida ao teste de Tukey (α = 0,05). Outras variáveis não apresentaram normalidade e homogeneidade de variâncias e foram comparadas por Kruskal-Wallis (α = 0,05). Os insumos biológicos influenciaram positivamente no crescimento inicial de Bauhinia forficata. A altura, o diâmetro do coleto, a área foliar e a biomassa seca (total, aérea e radicular) foram superiores em relação aos tratamentos controle, para ambos os ensaios. Dentre as estirpes de Trichoderma spp., T13 apresentou melhores resultados para o crescimento das mudas em relação à T33. Mudas produzidas com proporções maiores de vermicomposto (50, 60 e 80 %) apresentaram desenvolvimento estatisticamente superior em altura e diâmetro do coleto, a partir dos 90 dias após semeadura, quando comparado ao tratamento controle. No entanto, não houve um padrão claro de diferenças entre as outras doses testadas, exigindo mais testes de dosagem. Trichoderma spp. e vermicomposto mostraram-se promissores para produção de Bauhinia forficata para fins medicinais.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2020-06-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/3332210.5902/1980509833322Ciência Florestal; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2020); 367-379Ciência Florestal; v. 30 n. 2 (2020); 367-3791980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMenghttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/33322/33322Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Florestalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeccatti, AlineRovedder, Ana Paula MoreiraSteffen, Gerusa Pauli KistMaldaner, JoseilaCamargo, BetinaDalcul, Luna ParodeNeuenschwander, FredericoHummel, Rafaela BadinelliCapitani, Luana Camila2021-05-20T04:00:45Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33322Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2021-05-20T04:00:45Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biological inputs in promoting the growth of Bauhinia forficata Link. seedlings Insumos biológicos na promoção do crescimento de mudas de Bauhinia forficata Link. |
title |
Biological inputs in promoting the growth of Bauhinia forficata Link. seedlings |
spellingShingle |
Biological inputs in promoting the growth of Bauhinia forficata Link. seedlings Peccatti, Aline Trichoderma Vermicompost Medicinal species Pata-de-vaca Fabaceae Trichoderma Vermicomposto Espécies medicinais Pata-de-vaca Fabaceae |
title_short |
Biological inputs in promoting the growth of Bauhinia forficata Link. seedlings |
title_full |
Biological inputs in promoting the growth of Bauhinia forficata Link. seedlings |
title_fullStr |
Biological inputs in promoting the growth of Bauhinia forficata Link. seedlings |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biological inputs in promoting the growth of Bauhinia forficata Link. seedlings |
title_sort |
Biological inputs in promoting the growth of Bauhinia forficata Link. seedlings |
author |
Peccatti, Aline |
author_facet |
Peccatti, Aline Rovedder, Ana Paula Moreira Steffen, Gerusa Pauli Kist Maldaner, Joseila Camargo, Betina Dalcul, Luna Parode Neuenschwander, Frederico Hummel, Rafaela Badinelli Capitani, Luana Camila |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rovedder, Ana Paula Moreira Steffen, Gerusa Pauli Kist Maldaner, Joseila Camargo, Betina Dalcul, Luna Parode Neuenschwander, Frederico Hummel, Rafaela Badinelli Capitani, Luana Camila |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Peccatti, Aline Rovedder, Ana Paula Moreira Steffen, Gerusa Pauli Kist Maldaner, Joseila Camargo, Betina Dalcul, Luna Parode Neuenschwander, Frederico Hummel, Rafaela Badinelli Capitani, Luana Camila |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Trichoderma Vermicompost Medicinal species Pata-de-vaca Fabaceae Trichoderma Vermicomposto Espécies medicinais Pata-de-vaca Fabaceae |
topic |
Trichoderma Vermicompost Medicinal species Pata-de-vaca Fabaceae Trichoderma Vermicomposto Espécies medicinais Pata-de-vaca Fabaceae |
description |
Crops of medicinal plants demand careful attention with agrochemicals in order to avoid changing the composition of its active principles. Biological inputs are more recommended for this purpose. We tested the effects of Trichoderma and vermicompost on Bauhinia forficata Link. seedlings, one of the most exploited species for medicinal purposes. Two trials were installed in a completely randomized design with 40 replicates in a greenhouse in southern Brazil. We tested two Trichoderma asperelloides strains (T1 and T2) and two Trichoderma harzianum strains (T13 and T33) inoculated on substrate and a control treatment (substrate without inoculation). The vermicompost assay tested the proportions 0, 20, 40, 50, 60 and 80 % vermicompost (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 respectively). The variables of height, collar diameter, chlorophyll content and leaf number were evaluated at 45, 90 and 135 days after seeding. We analyzed seedlings survival, leaf area, shoot and root total dry biomass, and Dickson Quality Index at 135 days after seeding. Leaf area was submitted to the Tukey test (α = 0.05). Other variables did not present normality and homogeneity of variances and were compared by Kruskal-Wallis (α = 0.05). Biological inputs positively influenced the initial growth of Bauhinia forficata. Height, collar diameter, leaf area and try biomass (total, shoot and root) were higher in relation to control treatments for both trials. Among Trichoderma strains, T13 presented the best results in relation to T33. Seedlings produced with larger percentages of vermicompost (50, 60 and 80%) presented statistically higher development for height and collar diameter 90 days after seeding when compared to the control treatment. However, there was no clear pattern of differences between the other doses of this entry, requiring further dosing tests. Trichoderma and vermicompost showed to be promising for the production of Bauhinia forficata for medicinal purposes. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/33322 10.5902/1980509833322 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/33322 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5902/1980509833322 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/33322/33322 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Florestal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Florestal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2020); 367-379 Ciência Florestal; v. 30 n. 2 (2020); 367-379 1980-5098 0103-9954 reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
collection |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br |
_version_ |
1799944133851217920 |