A methodological proposal for the reading of texts in educational evaluation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufsm.br/regae/article/view/15935 |
Resumo: | This paper is the result of research that aims to identify models and rules adopted for building knowledge, the issues regarded as legitimate, the basics principles not problematized and those on which consensus is required, in texts considered paradigmatic for the camp of educational evaluation in Brazil, that were published in the collection of 1982, which points to educational programas directions. It was used as the methodological procedures political epistemology formulated by Rothen (2004). From the analysis carried out it is possible to observe that the definition of what can be evaluation is the key point for understanding the issues related to their scope, their methods or even their limitations. The main problems cited by the authors focus necessarily on methodological issues, that cover on the moments in which consensus is sought.Key-words: educational evaluation, paradigmatic texts, political epistemology. |
id |
UFSM-7_1c9b9f7d0739f569e3f1abe33db3d3ca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15935 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-7 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A methodological proposal for the reading of texts in educational evaluationUma proposta metodológica para a leitura de textos em avaliação educacionalThis paper is the result of research that aims to identify models and rules adopted for building knowledge, the issues regarded as legitimate, the basics principles not problematized and those on which consensus is required, in texts considered paradigmatic for the camp of educational evaluation in Brazil, that were published in the collection of 1982, which points to educational programas directions. It was used as the methodological procedures political epistemology formulated by Rothen (2004). From the analysis carried out it is possible to observe that the definition of what can be evaluation is the key point for understanding the issues related to their scope, their methods or even their limitations. The main problems cited by the authors focus necessarily on methodological issues, that cover on the moments in which consensus is sought.Key-words: educational evaluation, paradigmatic texts, political epistemology.O texto resulta de pesquisa que procurou identificar os modelos e regras adotados para a construção do conhecimento, os problemas considerados legítimos, os princípios básicos não problematizados e aqueles sobre os quais se busca consenso em textos considerados paradigmáticos para o campo da avaliação educacional no Brasil, que se encontram organizados em coletânea publicada em 1982, que focaliza a avaliação de programas educacionais. Utilizou-se, enquanto procedimento metodológico, a epistemologia política formulada por Rothen (2004). Da análise realizada é possível constatar que a definição do que seja avaliação é o ponto primordial para a compreensão de questões relacionadas ao seu alcance, aos seus métodos e mesmo as suas limitações. Os principais problemas apontados pelos autores enfocam, necessariamente, a questões de cunho metodológico, que acabam por incidir sobre os momentos nos quais se busca obter consenso.Palavras-chave: avaliação educacional, textos paradigmáticos, epistemologia política.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2014-11-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/regae/article/view/1593510.5902/2176217115935Regae: Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional; v. 4, n. 7, jan./jun., 2015; 83-96Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional; v. 4, n. 7, jan./jun., 2015; 83-962318-13382176-2171reponame:Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacionalinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/regae/article/view/15935/pdfBorges, Regilson MacielRothen, José Carlosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-08-14T18:47:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15935Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/regaePUBhttp://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/regae/oai||revistaregae@gmail.com2318-13382176-2171opendoar:2020-08-14T18:47:01Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A methodological proposal for the reading of texts in educational evaluation Uma proposta metodológica para a leitura de textos em avaliação educacional |
title |
A methodological proposal for the reading of texts in educational evaluation |
spellingShingle |
A methodological proposal for the reading of texts in educational evaluation Borges, Regilson Maciel |
title_short |
A methodological proposal for the reading of texts in educational evaluation |
title_full |
A methodological proposal for the reading of texts in educational evaluation |
title_fullStr |
A methodological proposal for the reading of texts in educational evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
A methodological proposal for the reading of texts in educational evaluation |
title_sort |
A methodological proposal for the reading of texts in educational evaluation |
author |
Borges, Regilson Maciel |
author_facet |
Borges, Regilson Maciel Rothen, José Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rothen, José Carlos |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Borges, Regilson Maciel Rothen, José Carlos |
description |
This paper is the result of research that aims to identify models and rules adopted for building knowledge, the issues regarded as legitimate, the basics principles not problematized and those on which consensus is required, in texts considered paradigmatic for the camp of educational evaluation in Brazil, that were published in the collection of 1982, which points to educational programas directions. It was used as the methodological procedures political epistemology formulated by Rothen (2004). From the analysis carried out it is possible to observe that the definition of what can be evaluation is the key point for understanding the issues related to their scope, their methods or even their limitations. The main problems cited by the authors focus necessarily on methodological issues, that cover on the moments in which consensus is sought.Key-words: educational evaluation, paradigmatic texts, political epistemology. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-11-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufsm.br/regae/article/view/15935 10.5902/2176217115935 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufsm.br/regae/article/view/15935 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5902/2176217115935 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufsm.br/regae/article/view/15935/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Regae: Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional; v. 4, n. 7, jan./jun., 2015; 83-96 Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional; v. 4, n. 7, jan./jun., 2015; 83-96 2318-1338 2176-2171 reponame:Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional |
collection |
Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaregae@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1809281067748687872 |