Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19465 |
Resumo: | The present research aims to analyze the politics of presidential impeachment in Brazil between 1992 and 2016, specifically the cases of Fernando Collor de Mello (PRN) and Dilma Vana Rousseff (PT). The study focused on three conceptual categories - policy of impeachment, executive/legislative relationship, and legislative shield - to understand the different outcomes of processes that culminate in removing or keeping presidents in office. The analysis was delimited in the support of Congress to answer the research problem: "How does the legislative shield influence the policy of presidential impeachment?". A President's Legislative Shield is made up of parliamentarians willing to protect him in the event of an impeachment process. According to Perez-Liñan (2009), the legislative shield is the size of the president's party coalition and its internal cohesion. Thus, to answer the question, a comparison is presented by means of three factors and their characteristics: Denunciation Factor (Number of Complaints, Parliamentary/Non-parliamentary), Legislative Composition Factor (President of chamber, Party of president) and Coalition Party Factor (Governance Coalition, Coalition of Opposition). First, the comparison of two blocks: those that remained in the presidency even with protocol processes - FHC (PSDB) and Lula (PT) - and those who were deposed - Collor (PRN) and Rousseff (PT). After identifying that the legislative shield is primordial to stop the process, it is made the comparison between the two cases effected in the country to thus identify the similarities and particularities between Collor and Rousseff. Operating this research design, comparing and observing how the impeachment policy delimited in the legislative shield occurred in each scenario, made it possible to test and verify the research hypothesis raised, which presents that the legislative shield as an institutional instrument determines the archiving or follow-up of the presidential impeachment process. The analysis pointed out that although Fernando Collor de Mello and Dilma Vana Rousseff also suffered impeachment, the policy of impediment in each case is distinguished by its characteristics as allies and opponents, but the suggestion that remains is the importance of the legislative shield, which is formed by a strong party coalition and a legislative composition favorable to the president. |
id |
UFSM_3684ff844b4dd678f59e5d0680b5b6f3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/19465 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e RousseffPresidential Impeachment policy: a comparative analysis of the factors that impulse the Collor and Rousseff impedimentImpeachment presidencialFernando CollorDilma RousseffEscudo legislativoImpeachmentLegislative ShieldCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIAThe present research aims to analyze the politics of presidential impeachment in Brazil between 1992 and 2016, specifically the cases of Fernando Collor de Mello (PRN) and Dilma Vana Rousseff (PT). The study focused on three conceptual categories - policy of impeachment, executive/legislative relationship, and legislative shield - to understand the different outcomes of processes that culminate in removing or keeping presidents in office. The analysis was delimited in the support of Congress to answer the research problem: "How does the legislative shield influence the policy of presidential impeachment?". A President's Legislative Shield is made up of parliamentarians willing to protect him in the event of an impeachment process. According to Perez-Liñan (2009), the legislative shield is the size of the president's party coalition and its internal cohesion. Thus, to answer the question, a comparison is presented by means of three factors and their characteristics: Denunciation Factor (Number of Complaints, Parliamentary/Non-parliamentary), Legislative Composition Factor (President of chamber, Party of president) and Coalition Party Factor (Governance Coalition, Coalition of Opposition). First, the comparison of two blocks: those that remained in the presidency even with protocol processes - FHC (PSDB) and Lula (PT) - and those who were deposed - Collor (PRN) and Rousseff (PT). After identifying that the legislative shield is primordial to stop the process, it is made the comparison between the two cases effected in the country to thus identify the similarities and particularities between Collor and Rousseff. Operating this research design, comparing and observing how the impeachment policy delimited in the legislative shield occurred in each scenario, made it possible to test and verify the research hypothesis raised, which presents that the legislative shield as an institutional instrument determines the archiving or follow-up of the presidential impeachment process. The analysis pointed out that although Fernando Collor de Mello and Dilma Vana Rousseff also suffered impeachment, the policy of impediment in each case is distinguished by its characteristics as allies and opponents, but the suggestion that remains is the importance of the legislative shield, which is formed by a strong party coalition and a legislative composition favorable to the president.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESA presente pesquisa tem como objetivo analisar a política do impeachment presidencial no Brasil entre 1992 e 2016, especificamente, os casos de Fernando Collor de Mello (PRN) e Dilma Vana Rousseff (PT). O estudo orientou-se em três categorias conceituais - política do impeachment, relação executivo/legislativo e escudo legislativo - para compreender os diferentes desfechos de processos que culminam em afastar ou manter presidentes em seus cargos. A análise se delimitou no apoio do Congresso para responder o problema de pesquisa: “Como o escudo legislativo influencia a política do impeachment presidencial?”. O Escudo Legislativo de um presidente é composto pelos parlamentares dispostos a protegê-lo no caso do surgimento de um processo de impeachment. Conforme Perez-Liñan (2009), o escudo legislativo é o tamanho da coalizão partidária do presidente e a sua coesão interna. Deste modo, para responder a questão apresenta-se um comparativo por meio de três fatores e suas características: Fator Denúncia (Número de Denúncias, Parlamentar/Não parlamentar), Fator Composição Legislativa (Presidente da Câmara, Partido do presidente da Câmara) e Fator Coalizão Partidária (Coalizão Governativa, Coalizão de Oposição). Primeiramente, a comparação de dois blocos: os que se mantiveram na presidência mesmo com processos protocolados – FHC (PSDB) e Lula (PT) - e os que foram destituídos – Collor (PRN) e Rousseff (PT). Após identificado que o escudo legislativo é primordial para barrar o processo, faz-se a comparação entre os dois casos efetivados no país para assim identificar as similaridades e particularidades entre Collor e Rousseff. Ao operacionalizar este desenho de pesquisa, comparar e observar como se deu a política do impeachment delimitado no escudo legislativo em cada cenário, possibilitou testar e verificar a hipótese de pesquisa levantada, a qual apresenta que o escudo legislativo enquanto instrumento institucional determina o arquivamento ou seguimento do processo de impeachment presidencial. A análise apontou que embora Fernando Collor de Mello e Dilma Vana Rousseff igualmente terem sofrido o impeachment, a política do impedimento em cada caso se distingue por suas características de aliados e opositores, mas a sugestão que fica é da importância, ao final do escudo legislativo, o qual é formado por uma coalizão partidária forte e uma composição legislativa favorável ao presidente.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilSociologiaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências SociaisCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasCampos, Rosana Soareshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3832191347253241Cabrera, Carlos Artur Gallohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6099239530718796Grohmann, Luis Gustavo Mellohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6187581697631376Maidana, Andreia Sena2020-02-03T15:31:09Z2020-02-03T15:31:09Z2019-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19465porAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2022-07-18T13:41:42Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/19465Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2022-07-18T13:41:42Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff Presidential Impeachment policy: a comparative analysis of the factors that impulse the Collor and Rousseff impediment |
title |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff |
spellingShingle |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff Maidana, Andreia Sena Impeachment presidencial Fernando Collor Dilma Rousseff Escudo legislativo Impeachment Legislative Shield CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
title_short |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff |
title_full |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff |
title_fullStr |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff |
title_full_unstemmed |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff |
title_sort |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff |
author |
Maidana, Andreia Sena |
author_facet |
Maidana, Andreia Sena |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Campos, Rosana Soares http://lattes.cnpq.br/3832191347253241 Cabrera, Carlos Artur Gallo http://lattes.cnpq.br/6099239530718796 Grohmann, Luis Gustavo Mello http://lattes.cnpq.br/6187581697631376 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Maidana, Andreia Sena |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Impeachment presidencial Fernando Collor Dilma Rousseff Escudo legislativo Impeachment Legislative Shield CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
topic |
Impeachment presidencial Fernando Collor Dilma Rousseff Escudo legislativo Impeachment Legislative Shield CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
description |
The present research aims to analyze the politics of presidential impeachment in Brazil between 1992 and 2016, specifically the cases of Fernando Collor de Mello (PRN) and Dilma Vana Rousseff (PT). The study focused on three conceptual categories - policy of impeachment, executive/legislative relationship, and legislative shield - to understand the different outcomes of processes that culminate in removing or keeping presidents in office. The analysis was delimited in the support of Congress to answer the research problem: "How does the legislative shield influence the policy of presidential impeachment?". A President's Legislative Shield is made up of parliamentarians willing to protect him in the event of an impeachment process. According to Perez-Liñan (2009), the legislative shield is the size of the president's party coalition and its internal cohesion. Thus, to answer the question, a comparison is presented by means of three factors and their characteristics: Denunciation Factor (Number of Complaints, Parliamentary/Non-parliamentary), Legislative Composition Factor (President of chamber, Party of president) and Coalition Party Factor (Governance Coalition, Coalition of Opposition). First, the comparison of two blocks: those that remained in the presidency even with protocol processes - FHC (PSDB) and Lula (PT) - and those who were deposed - Collor (PRN) and Rousseff (PT). After identifying that the legislative shield is primordial to stop the process, it is made the comparison between the two cases effected in the country to thus identify the similarities and particularities between Collor and Rousseff. Operating this research design, comparing and observing how the impeachment policy delimited in the legislative shield occurred in each scenario, made it possible to test and verify the research hypothesis raised, which presents that the legislative shield as an institutional instrument determines the archiving or follow-up of the presidential impeachment process. The analysis pointed out that although Fernando Collor de Mello and Dilma Vana Rousseff also suffered impeachment, the policy of impediment in each case is distinguished by its characteristics as allies and opponents, but the suggestion that remains is the importance of the legislative shield, which is formed by a strong party coalition and a legislative composition favorable to the president. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-28 2020-02-03T15:31:09Z 2020-02-03T15:31:09Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19465 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19465 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Sociologia UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Sociologia UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1805922022250774528 |