The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kara-Jose, Andrea C. [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Melo, Luiz Alberto S., Jr. [UNIFESP], Esporcatte, Bruno L. B. {UNIFESP], Endo, Angelica T. N. H. [UNIFESP], Leite, Mauro Toledo [UNIFESP], Tavares, Ivan Maynart [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181428
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53441
Resumo: Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of and to determine the correlations between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) and anatomical and functional tests used for glaucoma detection. A total of 54 healthy subjects (54 eyes) and 47 primary open-angle glaucoma patients (47 eyes) were included in this cross-sectional observational study. DDLS scores and cup-to-disc (C/D) ratios were evaluated. Subjects underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP), optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) imaging with time and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (TD and SD-OCT), Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT II), and scanning laser polarimetry (GDx-VCC). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AROCs) for DDLS and diagnostic tests parameters were calculated. DDLS correlations (Spearman's rank) among these parameters were analyzed. Fifty-four eyes were healthy and 47 had glaucoma, including 16 preperimetric glaucoma. DDLS, vertical and horizontal C/D ratios had the largest AROCs (0.92, 0.94 and 0.91, respectively). DDLS diagnostic accuracy was better than the accuracies of HRT II parameters, TD and SD-OCT RNFL thicknesses, and SAP mean deviation (MD) index. There were no significant differences between the accuracies of the DDLS and the C/D ratios, TD-OCT vertical (0.89) and horizontal (0.86) C/D ratios, TD-OCT C/D area ratio (0.89), and GDx-VCC NFI (0.81). DDLS showed significant strong correlations with vertical (r = 0.79) and horizontal (0.74) C/D ratios, and with the parameters vertical C/D ratio and C/D area ratio from HRT II (both 0.77) and TD-OCT (0.75 and 0.72, respectively). DDLS had significant moderate correlations with most of the other structural measurements and SAP MD. The optic disc clinical evaluation with DDLS system and C/D ratio demonstrated excellent accuracy in distinguishing glaucomatous from healthy eyes. DDLS had moderate to strong correlations with most structural and functional parameters. These findings stress the importance of optic disc clinical examination to detect glaucoma in a clinical scenario.
id UFSP_0d29dfef20ebbe6e0214536f633eaaac
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/53441
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Kara-Jose, Andrea C. [UNIFESP]Melo, Luiz Alberto S., Jr. [UNIFESP]Esporcatte, Bruno L. B. {UNIFESP]Endo, Angelica T. N. H. [UNIFESP]Leite, Mauro Toledo [UNIFESP]Tavares, Ivan Maynart [UNIFESP]2020-06-26T16:30:15Z2020-06-26T16:30:15Z2017http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181428Plos One. San Francisco, v. 12, n. 7, p. -, 2017.1932-6203https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53441WOS000406634500071.pdf10.1371/journal.pone.0181428WOS:000406634500071Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of and to determine the correlations between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) and anatomical and functional tests used for glaucoma detection. A total of 54 healthy subjects (54 eyes) and 47 primary open-angle glaucoma patients (47 eyes) were included in this cross-sectional observational study. DDLS scores and cup-to-disc (C/D) ratios were evaluated. Subjects underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP), optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) imaging with time and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (TD and SD-OCT), Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT II), and scanning laser polarimetry (GDx-VCC). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AROCs) for DDLS and diagnostic tests parameters were calculated. DDLS correlations (Spearman's rank) among these parameters were analyzed. Fifty-four eyes were healthy and 47 had glaucoma, including 16 preperimetric glaucoma. DDLS, vertical and horizontal C/D ratios had the largest AROCs (0.92, 0.94 and 0.91, respectively). DDLS diagnostic accuracy was better than the accuracies of HRT II parameters, TD and SD-OCT RNFL thicknesses, and SAP mean deviation (MD) index. There were no significant differences between the accuracies of the DDLS and the C/D ratios, TD-OCT vertical (0.89) and horizontal (0.86) C/D ratios, TD-OCT C/D area ratio (0.89), and GDx-VCC NFI (0.81). DDLS showed significant strong correlations with vertical (r = 0.79) and horizontal (0.74) C/D ratios, and with the parameters vertical C/D ratio and C/D area ratio from HRT II (both 0.77) and TD-OCT (0.75 and 0.72, respectively). DDLS had significant moderate correlations with most of the other structural measurements and SAP MD. The optic disc clinical evaluation with DDLS system and C/D ratio demonstrated excellent accuracy in distinguishing glaucomatous from healthy eyes. DDLS had moderate to strong correlations with most structural and functional parameters. These findings stress the importance of optic disc clinical examination to detect glaucoma in a clinical scenario.CAPES/Ministry of Education of BrazilCNPq/Ministry of Science and Technology of BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista Med, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Glaucoma Div, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista Med, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Glaucoma Div, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilCAPESCNPqWeb of Science-engPublic Library SciencePlos OneThe disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleSan Francisco127info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPORIGINALWOS000406634500071.pdfapplication/pdf6745966${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/53441/1/WOS000406634500071.pdfed0db7da7117253db2d447abc1e8a6acMD51open accessTEXTWOS000406634500071.pdf.txtWOS000406634500071.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain15${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/53441/2/WOS000406634500071.pdf.txt429079e52f342c49301a02e207bfde06MD52open accessTHUMBNAILWOS000406634500071.pdf.jpgWOS000406634500071.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg7208${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/53441/4/WOS000406634500071.pdf.jpg6f2e549d6f35fd025ea01adb51325006MD54open access11600/534412022-08-01 10:32:52.855open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/53441Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-05-25T12:26:57.452791Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
title The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
spellingShingle The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
Kara-Jose, Andrea C. [UNIFESP]
title_short The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
title_full The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
title_fullStr The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
title_full_unstemmed The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
title_sort The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry
author Kara-Jose, Andrea C. [UNIFESP]
author_facet Kara-Jose, Andrea C. [UNIFESP]
Melo, Luiz Alberto S., Jr. [UNIFESP]
Esporcatte, Bruno L. B. {UNIFESP]
Endo, Angelica T. N. H. [UNIFESP]
Leite, Mauro Toledo [UNIFESP]
Tavares, Ivan Maynart [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Melo, Luiz Alberto S., Jr. [UNIFESP]
Esporcatte, Bruno L. B. {UNIFESP]
Endo, Angelica T. N. H. [UNIFESP]
Leite, Mauro Toledo [UNIFESP]
Tavares, Ivan Maynart [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kara-Jose, Andrea C. [UNIFESP]
Melo, Luiz Alberto S., Jr. [UNIFESP]
Esporcatte, Bruno L. B. {UNIFESP]
Endo, Angelica T. N. H. [UNIFESP]
Leite, Mauro Toledo [UNIFESP]
Tavares, Ivan Maynart [UNIFESP]
description Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of and to determine the correlations between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) and anatomical and functional tests used for glaucoma detection. A total of 54 healthy subjects (54 eyes) and 47 primary open-angle glaucoma patients (47 eyes) were included in this cross-sectional observational study. DDLS scores and cup-to-disc (C/D) ratios were evaluated. Subjects underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP), optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) imaging with time and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (TD and SD-OCT), Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT II), and scanning laser polarimetry (GDx-VCC). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AROCs) for DDLS and diagnostic tests parameters were calculated. DDLS correlations (Spearman's rank) among these parameters were analyzed. Fifty-four eyes were healthy and 47 had glaucoma, including 16 preperimetric glaucoma. DDLS, vertical and horizontal C/D ratios had the largest AROCs (0.92, 0.94 and 0.91, respectively). DDLS diagnostic accuracy was better than the accuracies of HRT II parameters, TD and SD-OCT RNFL thicknesses, and SAP mean deviation (MD) index. There were no significant differences between the accuracies of the DDLS and the C/D ratios, TD-OCT vertical (0.89) and horizontal (0.86) C/D ratios, TD-OCT C/D area ratio (0.89), and GDx-VCC NFI (0.81). DDLS showed significant strong correlations with vertical (r = 0.79) and horizontal (0.74) C/D ratios, and with the parameters vertical C/D ratio and C/D area ratio from HRT II (both 0.77) and TD-OCT (0.75 and 0.72, respectively). DDLS had significant moderate correlations with most of the other structural measurements and SAP MD. The optic disc clinical evaluation with DDLS system and C/D ratio demonstrated excellent accuracy in distinguishing glaucomatous from healthy eyes. DDLS had moderate to strong correlations with most structural and functional parameters. These findings stress the importance of optic disc clinical examination to detect glaucoma in a clinical scenario.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-06-26T16:30:15Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-06-26T16:30:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.].fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181428
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Plos One. San Francisco, v. 12, n. 7, p. -, 2017.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53441
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1932-6203
dc.identifier.file.none.fl_str_mv WOS000406634500071.pdf
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0181428
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000406634500071
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181428
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53441
identifier_str_mv Plos One. San Francisco, v. 12, n. 7, p. -, 2017.
1932-6203
WOS000406634500071.pdf
10.1371/journal.pone.0181428
WOS:000406634500071
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Plos One
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv -
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv San Francisco
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/53441/1/WOS000406634500071.pdf
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/53441/2/WOS000406634500071.pdf.txt
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/53441/4/WOS000406634500071.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ed0db7da7117253db2d447abc1e8a6ac
429079e52f342c49301a02e207bfde06
6f2e549d6f35fd025ea01adb51325006
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1783460292179525632