What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vilela, Vitoria Carvalho [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Pacheco, Rafael Leite [UNIFESP], Cruz Latorraca, Carolina Oliveira [UNIFESP], Pachito, Daniela Vianna [UNIFESP], Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/54517
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Dementia is a highly prevalent condition worldwide. Its chronic and progressive presentation has an impact on physical and psychosocial characteristics and on public healthcare. Our aim was to summarize evidence from Cochrane reviews on non-pharmacological treatments for cognitive disorders and dementia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo. METHODS: Cochrane reviews on non-pharmacological interventions for cognitive dysfunctions and/or type of dementia were included. For this, independent assessments were made by two authors. RESULTS: Twenty-four reviews were included. These showed that carbohydrate intake and validation therapy may be beneficial for cognitive disorders. For dementia, there is a potential benefit from physical activity programs, cognitive training, psychological treatments, aromatherapy, light therapy, cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive stimulation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy in association with donepezil, functional analysis, reminiscence therapy, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, structured decision-making on feeding options, case management approaches, interventions by non-specialist healthcare workers and specialized care units. No benefits were found in relation to enteral tube feeding, acupuncture, Snoezelen stimulation, respite care, palliative care team and interventions to prevent wandering behavior. CONCLUSION: Many non-pharmacological interventions for patients with cognitive impairment and dementia have been studied and potential benefits have been shown. However, the strength of evidence derived from these studies was considered low overall, due to the methodological limitations of the primary studies.
id UFSP_1bddf8a2ed09bc0a7c33ec7bd24e60b7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/54517
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?DementiaAlzheimer diseaseReviewEvidence-based practiceEvidence-based medicineBACKGROUND: Dementia is a highly prevalent condition worldwide. Its chronic and progressive presentation has an impact on physical and psychosocial characteristics and on public healthcare. Our aim was to summarize evidence from Cochrane reviews on non-pharmacological treatments for cognitive disorders and dementia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo. METHODS: Cochrane reviews on non-pharmacological interventions for cognitive dysfunctions and/or type of dementia were included. For this, independent assessments were made by two authors. RESULTS: Twenty-four reviews were included. These showed that carbohydrate intake and validation therapy may be beneficial for cognitive disorders. For dementia, there is a potential benefit from physical activity programs, cognitive training, psychological treatments, aromatherapy, light therapy, cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive stimulation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy in association with donepezil, functional analysis, reminiscence therapy, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, structured decision-making on feeding options, case management approaches, interventions by non-specialist healthcare workers and specialized care units. No benefits were found in relation to enteral tube feeding, acupuncture, Snoezelen stimulation, respite care, palliative care team and interventions to prevent wandering behavior. CONCLUSION: Many non-pharmacological interventions for patients with cognitive impairment and dementia have been studied and potential benefits have been shown. However, the strength of evidence derived from these studies was considered low overall, due to the methodological limitations of the primary studies.Univ Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, EPM, Discipline Evidence Based Med, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, EPM, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Evidence Based Hlth Program, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilCochrane Brazil, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, EPM, Discipline Evidence Based Med, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, EPM, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Evidence Based Hlth Program, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of ScienceAssociacao Paulista Medicina2020-07-13T11:53:18Z2020-07-13T11:53:18Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion309-320application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Sao Paulo, v. 135, n. 3, p. 309-320, 2017.10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617S1516-31802017000300309.pdf1516-3180S1516-31802017000300309https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/54517WOS:000406339500015engSao Paulo Medical JournalSao Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVilela, Vitoria Carvalho [UNIFESP]Pacheco, Rafael Leite [UNIFESP]Cruz Latorraca, Carolina Oliveira [UNIFESP]Pachito, Daniela Vianna [UNIFESP]Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP]reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-01T09:06:16Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/54517Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-01T09:06:16Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?
title What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?
spellingShingle What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?
Vilela, Vitoria Carvalho [UNIFESP]
Dementia
Alzheimer disease
Review
Evidence-based practice
Evidence-based medicine
title_short What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?
title_full What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?
title_fullStr What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?
title_full_unstemmed What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?
title_sort What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?
author Vilela, Vitoria Carvalho [UNIFESP]
author_facet Vilela, Vitoria Carvalho [UNIFESP]
Pacheco, Rafael Leite [UNIFESP]
Cruz Latorraca, Carolina Oliveira [UNIFESP]
Pachito, Daniela Vianna [UNIFESP]
Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Pacheco, Rafael Leite [UNIFESP]
Cruz Latorraca, Carolina Oliveira [UNIFESP]
Pachito, Daniela Vianna [UNIFESP]
Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vilela, Vitoria Carvalho [UNIFESP]
Pacheco, Rafael Leite [UNIFESP]
Cruz Latorraca, Carolina Oliveira [UNIFESP]
Pachito, Daniela Vianna [UNIFESP]
Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dementia
Alzheimer disease
Review
Evidence-based practice
Evidence-based medicine
topic Dementia
Alzheimer disease
Review
Evidence-based practice
Evidence-based medicine
description BACKGROUND: Dementia is a highly prevalent condition worldwide. Its chronic and progressive presentation has an impact on physical and psychosocial characteristics and on public healthcare. Our aim was to summarize evidence from Cochrane reviews on non-pharmacological treatments for cognitive disorders and dementia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo. METHODS: Cochrane reviews on non-pharmacological interventions for cognitive dysfunctions and/or type of dementia were included. For this, independent assessments were made by two authors. RESULTS: Twenty-four reviews were included. These showed that carbohydrate intake and validation therapy may be beneficial for cognitive disorders. For dementia, there is a potential benefit from physical activity programs, cognitive training, psychological treatments, aromatherapy, light therapy, cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive stimulation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy in association with donepezil, functional analysis, reminiscence therapy, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, structured decision-making on feeding options, case management approaches, interventions by non-specialist healthcare workers and specialized care units. No benefits were found in relation to enteral tube feeding, acupuncture, Snoezelen stimulation, respite care, palliative care team and interventions to prevent wandering behavior. CONCLUSION: Many non-pharmacological interventions for patients with cognitive impairment and dementia have been studied and potential benefits have been shown. However, the strength of evidence derived from these studies was considered low overall, due to the methodological limitations of the primary studies.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2020-07-13T11:53:18Z
2020-07-13T11:53:18Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617
Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Sao Paulo, v. 135, n. 3, p. 309-320, 2017.
10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617
S1516-31802017000300309.pdf
1516-3180
S1516-31802017000300309
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/54517
WOS:000406339500015
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/54517
identifier_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Sao Paulo, v. 135, n. 3, p. 309-320, 2017.
10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617
S1516-31802017000300309.pdf
1516-3180
S1516-31802017000300309
WOS:000406339500015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 309-320
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associacao Paulista Medicina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associacao Paulista Medicina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268457625059328