What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/54517 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: Dementia is a highly prevalent condition worldwide. Its chronic and progressive presentation has an impact on physical and psychosocial characteristics and on public healthcare. Our aim was to summarize evidence from Cochrane reviews on non-pharmacological treatments for cognitive disorders and dementia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo. METHODS: Cochrane reviews on non-pharmacological interventions for cognitive dysfunctions and/or type of dementia were included. For this, independent assessments were made by two authors. RESULTS: Twenty-four reviews were included. These showed that carbohydrate intake and validation therapy may be beneficial for cognitive disorders. For dementia, there is a potential benefit from physical activity programs, cognitive training, psychological treatments, aromatherapy, light therapy, cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive stimulation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy in association with donepezil, functional analysis, reminiscence therapy, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, structured decision-making on feeding options, case management approaches, interventions by non-specialist healthcare workers and specialized care units. No benefits were found in relation to enteral tube feeding, acupuncture, Snoezelen stimulation, respite care, palliative care team and interventions to prevent wandering behavior. CONCLUSION: Many non-pharmacological interventions for patients with cognitive impairment and dementia have been studied and potential benefits have been shown. However, the strength of evidence derived from these studies was considered low overall, due to the methodological limitations of the primary studies. |
id |
UFSP_1bddf8a2ed09bc0a7c33ec7bd24e60b7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/54517 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?DementiaAlzheimer diseaseReviewEvidence-based practiceEvidence-based medicineBACKGROUND: Dementia is a highly prevalent condition worldwide. Its chronic and progressive presentation has an impact on physical and psychosocial characteristics and on public healthcare. Our aim was to summarize evidence from Cochrane reviews on non-pharmacological treatments for cognitive disorders and dementia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo. METHODS: Cochrane reviews on non-pharmacological interventions for cognitive dysfunctions and/or type of dementia were included. For this, independent assessments were made by two authors. RESULTS: Twenty-four reviews were included. These showed that carbohydrate intake and validation therapy may be beneficial for cognitive disorders. For dementia, there is a potential benefit from physical activity programs, cognitive training, psychological treatments, aromatherapy, light therapy, cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive stimulation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy in association with donepezil, functional analysis, reminiscence therapy, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, structured decision-making on feeding options, case management approaches, interventions by non-specialist healthcare workers and specialized care units. No benefits were found in relation to enteral tube feeding, acupuncture, Snoezelen stimulation, respite care, palliative care team and interventions to prevent wandering behavior. CONCLUSION: Many non-pharmacological interventions for patients with cognitive impairment and dementia have been studied and potential benefits have been shown. However, the strength of evidence derived from these studies was considered low overall, due to the methodological limitations of the primary studies.Univ Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, EPM, Discipline Evidence Based Med, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, EPM, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Evidence Based Hlth Program, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilCochrane Brazil, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, EPM, Discipline Evidence Based Med, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, EPM, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Evidence Based Hlth Program, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of ScienceAssociacao Paulista Medicina2020-07-13T11:53:18Z2020-07-13T11:53:18Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion309-320application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Sao Paulo, v. 135, n. 3, p. 309-320, 2017.10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617S1516-31802017000300309.pdf1516-3180S1516-31802017000300309https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/54517WOS:000406339500015engSao Paulo Medical JournalSao Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVilela, Vitoria Carvalho [UNIFESP]Pacheco, Rafael Leite [UNIFESP]Cruz Latorraca, Carolina Oliveira [UNIFESP]Pachito, Daniela Vianna [UNIFESP]Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP]reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-01T09:06:16Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/54517Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-01T09:06:16Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia? |
title |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia? |
spellingShingle |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia? Vilela, Vitoria Carvalho [UNIFESP] Dementia Alzheimer disease Review Evidence-based practice Evidence-based medicine |
title_short |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia? |
title_full |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia? |
title_fullStr |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia? |
title_sort |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia? |
author |
Vilela, Vitoria Carvalho [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Vilela, Vitoria Carvalho [UNIFESP] Pacheco, Rafael Leite [UNIFESP] Cruz Latorraca, Carolina Oliveira [UNIFESP] Pachito, Daniela Vianna [UNIFESP] Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pacheco, Rafael Leite [UNIFESP] Cruz Latorraca, Carolina Oliveira [UNIFESP] Pachito, Daniela Vianna [UNIFESP] Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vilela, Vitoria Carvalho [UNIFESP] Pacheco, Rafael Leite [UNIFESP] Cruz Latorraca, Carolina Oliveira [UNIFESP] Pachito, Daniela Vianna [UNIFESP] Riera, Rachel [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dementia Alzheimer disease Review Evidence-based practice Evidence-based medicine |
topic |
Dementia Alzheimer disease Review Evidence-based practice Evidence-based medicine |
description |
BACKGROUND: Dementia is a highly prevalent condition worldwide. Its chronic and progressive presentation has an impact on physical and psychosocial characteristics and on public healthcare. Our aim was to summarize evidence from Cochrane reviews on non-pharmacological treatments for cognitive disorders and dementia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo. METHODS: Cochrane reviews on non-pharmacological interventions for cognitive dysfunctions and/or type of dementia were included. For this, independent assessments were made by two authors. RESULTS: Twenty-four reviews were included. These showed that carbohydrate intake and validation therapy may be beneficial for cognitive disorders. For dementia, there is a potential benefit from physical activity programs, cognitive training, psychological treatments, aromatherapy, light therapy, cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive stimulation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy in association with donepezil, functional analysis, reminiscence therapy, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, structured decision-making on feeding options, case management approaches, interventions by non-specialist healthcare workers and specialized care units. No benefits were found in relation to enteral tube feeding, acupuncture, Snoezelen stimulation, respite care, palliative care team and interventions to prevent wandering behavior. CONCLUSION: Many non-pharmacological interventions for patients with cognitive impairment and dementia have been studied and potential benefits have been shown. However, the strength of evidence derived from these studies was considered low overall, due to the methodological limitations of the primary studies. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2020-07-13T11:53:18Z 2020-07-13T11:53:18Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617 Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Sao Paulo, v. 135, n. 3, p. 309-320, 2017. 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617 S1516-31802017000300309.pdf 1516-3180 S1516-31802017000300309 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/54517 WOS:000406339500015 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/54517 |
identifier_str_mv |
Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Sao Paulo, v. 135, n. 3, p. 309-320, 2017. 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617 S1516-31802017000300309.pdf 1516-3180 S1516-31802017000300309 WOS:000406339500015 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Sao Paulo Medical Journal |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
309-320 application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Sao Paulo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associacao Paulista Medicina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associacao Paulista Medicina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268457625059328 |