Refletindo a formação interdisciplinar na pós-graduação
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902011000100008 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/45564 |
Resumo: | This paper is about interdisciplinary post-graduation education from the perspective of Social Sciences and Humanities in Health supervisors and post-graduate students trained in health. Difficulties regarding post-graduation in general and specifically for health care professionals will be discussed. Some tensions about the production of knowledge from different disciplinary perspectives will be considered. A dialogue is necessary between supervisor, to whom theoretical framework takes a prominent place, and student, whose practice is guided by intervention. Theoretical dialogue between supervisor and student is asymmetrical and implies moral and ethical tensions for both. Geertz's term anthropological irony (2000) is used to discuss the relationship between supervisor and student. Finally, a reflection is proposed on possible attitudes and expectations in this relationship. We need a debate to discuss the effective contributions of this relationship and what is intended as interdisciplinary research. |
id |
UFSP_44cadb3fd7f64e03fe0e4dbc01b33be5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/45564 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Refletindo a formação interdisciplinar na pós-graduaçãoReflecting About Interdisciplinary Post-graduation EducationPost-graduationResearchEducationInterdisciplinarityThis paper is about interdisciplinary post-graduation education from the perspective of Social Sciences and Humanities in Health supervisors and post-graduate students trained in health. Difficulties regarding post-graduation in general and specifically for health care professionals will be discussed. Some tensions about the production of knowledge from different disciplinary perspectives will be considered. A dialogue is necessary between supervisor, to whom theoretical framework takes a prominent place, and student, whose practice is guided by intervention. Theoretical dialogue between supervisor and student is asymmetrical and implies moral and ethical tensions for both. Geertz's term anthropological irony (2000) is used to discuss the relationship between supervisor and student. Finally, a reflection is proposed on possible attitudes and expectations in this relationship. We need a debate to discuss the effective contributions of this relationship and what is intended as interdisciplinary research.Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Psiquiatria, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Psiquiatria, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceUniv Sao Paulo, Fac Saude PublicaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Martin, Denise [UNIFESP]2018-06-18T11:54:51Z2018-06-18T11:54:51Z2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion57-65application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902011000100008Saude E Sociedade. Sao Paulo: Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Saude Publica, v. 20, n. 1, p. 57-65, 2011.10.1590/S0104-12902011000100008S0104-12902011000100008.pdf0104-1290S0104-12902011000100008http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/45564WOS:000289643600008porSaude E Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-10T05:46:33Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/45564Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-10T05:46:33Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Refletindo a formação interdisciplinar na pós-graduação Reflecting About Interdisciplinary Post-graduation Education |
title |
Refletindo a formação interdisciplinar na pós-graduação |
spellingShingle |
Refletindo a formação interdisciplinar na pós-graduação Martin, Denise [UNIFESP] Post-graduation Research Education Interdisciplinarity |
title_short |
Refletindo a formação interdisciplinar na pós-graduação |
title_full |
Refletindo a formação interdisciplinar na pós-graduação |
title_fullStr |
Refletindo a formação interdisciplinar na pós-graduação |
title_full_unstemmed |
Refletindo a formação interdisciplinar na pós-graduação |
title_sort |
Refletindo a formação interdisciplinar na pós-graduação |
author |
Martin, Denise [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Martin, Denise [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martin, Denise [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Post-graduation Research Education Interdisciplinarity |
topic |
Post-graduation Research Education Interdisciplinarity |
description |
This paper is about interdisciplinary post-graduation education from the perspective of Social Sciences and Humanities in Health supervisors and post-graduate students trained in health. Difficulties regarding post-graduation in general and specifically for health care professionals will be discussed. Some tensions about the production of knowledge from different disciplinary perspectives will be considered. A dialogue is necessary between supervisor, to whom theoretical framework takes a prominent place, and student, whose practice is guided by intervention. Theoretical dialogue between supervisor and student is asymmetrical and implies moral and ethical tensions for both. Geertz's term anthropological irony (2000) is used to discuss the relationship between supervisor and student. Finally, a reflection is proposed on possible attitudes and expectations in this relationship. We need a debate to discuss the effective contributions of this relationship and what is intended as interdisciplinary research. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 2018-06-18T11:54:51Z 2018-06-18T11:54:51Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902011000100008 Saude E Sociedade. Sao Paulo: Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Saude Publica, v. 20, n. 1, p. 57-65, 2011. 10.1590/S0104-12902011000100008 S0104-12902011000100008.pdf 0104-1290 S0104-12902011000100008 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/45564 WOS:000289643600008 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902011000100008 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/45564 |
identifier_str_mv |
Saude E Sociedade. Sao Paulo: Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Saude Publica, v. 20, n. 1, p. 57-65, 2011. 10.1590/S0104-12902011000100008 S0104-12902011000100008.pdf 0104-1290 S0104-12902011000100008 WOS:000289643600008 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Saude E Sociedade |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
57-65 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Saude Publica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Saude Publica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268401850253312 |