Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Güenaga, Katia Ferreira [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Matos, Delcio [UNIFESP], Wille-Jorgensen, Peer
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6992
Resumo: The belief that mechanical bowel preparation is related to the reduction of complications in elective colorectal surgery is based on observational studies and expert opinion. This question led the authors to a systematic literature review, with the completion of meta-analysis, followed by three updates. METHOD: The sources of information were EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, IBECS, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and letters to the authors. The studies were included according to the randomization criteria. The studied variables were: anastomotic dehiscence, mortality and operatory wound infection. The analysis was divided into two comparisons: one group with mechanical preparation (Group A) compared with a group without preparation (Group B) (Comparison I) and a group submitted to rectal enema (Comparison II). RESULTS: We analyzed 5,805 patients in 20 clinical trials. In comparison I, anastomotic leak occurred in 4.4% (101/2,275 patients) in Group A and 4.5% (103/2,258 patients) in Group B. In comparison II, anastomotic leak occurred in 4.4% (27/601 patients) in Group A and 3.4% (21/609 patients) in Group B. CONCLUSION: Despite the inclusion of more studies, evidences found in studies did not show any benefit obtained from the use of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation or rectal cleansing enemas in elective colorectal surgery.
id UFSP_4a94818db793743e20d701df63a61f20
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6992
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysisColorectal surgeryReviewMeta-analysisPostoperative complicationsAnastomotic leakCirurgia colorretalRevisãoMeta-análiseComplicações pós-operatóriasFístula anastomóticaThe belief that mechanical bowel preparation is related to the reduction of complications in elective colorectal surgery is based on observational studies and expert opinion. This question led the authors to a systematic literature review, with the completion of meta-analysis, followed by three updates. METHOD: The sources of information were EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, IBECS, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and letters to the authors. The studies were included according to the randomization criteria. The studied variables were: anastomotic dehiscence, mortality and operatory wound infection. The analysis was divided into two comparisons: one group with mechanical preparation (Group A) compared with a group without preparation (Group B) (Comparison I) and a group submitted to rectal enema (Comparison II). RESULTS: We analyzed 5,805 patients in 20 clinical trials. In comparison I, anastomotic leak occurred in 4.4% (101/2,275 patients) in Group A and 4.5% (103/2,258 patients) in Group B. In comparison II, anastomotic leak occurred in 4.4% (27/601 patients) in Group A and 3.4% (21/609 patients) in Group B. CONCLUSION: Despite the inclusion of more studies, evidences found in studies did not show any benefit obtained from the use of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation or rectal cleansing enemas in elective colorectal surgery.A crença de que o preparo mecânico do cólon está relacionado à diminuição de complicações na cirurgia colorretal eletiva é baseada em estudos observacionais e opinião de especialistas. Seu questionamento motivou os autores na busca sistemática da literatura, com a realização de meta-análise, seguida de três atualizações. MÉTODO: Fontes de informação foram EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, IBECS, Registros de Ensaios Clínicos Casualizados da Colaboração Cochrane e cartas para os autores. Os estudos foram incluídos de acordo com os critérios de casualização. Os desfechos clínicos estudados foram: deiscência anastomótica, mortalidade e infecção da ferida operatória. A análise dos grupos foi dividida em duas comparações: comparação I, grupo submetido a preparo mecânico do cólon (Grupo A) comparado ao grupo sem preparo (Grupo B); comparação II, Grupo A, submetido a preparo do cólon e Grupo B, realizado apenas enema retal. RESULTADOS: Foram analisados 5.805 doentes em 20 ensaios clínicos. Na comparação I, deiscência anastomótica ocorreu em 4,4% (101/2.275 doentes) no Grupo A e 4,5% (103/2.258 doentes) no Grupo B. Na comparação II, deiscência anastomótica ocorreu em 4,4% (27/601 doentes) no Grupo A e 3,4% (21/609 doentes) no Grupo B. CONCLUSÃO: Apesar da inclusão de mais estudos, as evidências encontradas não demonstraram benefício no uso do preparo mecânico pré-operatório do cólon, assim como de enemas de limpeza do reto em cirurgia colorretal eletiva.Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Santos Coloproctology ServiceHospital Ana Costa de Santos Digestive Endoscopy ServiceUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM)Colorectal Cancer GroupUNIFESP, EPMSciELOSociedade Brasileira de ColoproctologiaSanta Casa da Misericórdia de Santos Coloproctology ServiceHospital Ana Costa de Santos Digestive Endoscopy ServiceUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Colorectal Cancer GroupGüenaga, Katia Ferreira [UNIFESP]Matos, Delcio [UNIFESP]Wille-Jorgensen, Peer2015-06-14T13:43:38Z2015-06-14T13:43:38Z2012-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion7-17application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro). Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia, v. 32, n. 1, p. 7-17, 2012.10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002S2237-93632012000100002.pdf2237-9363S2237-93632012000100002http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6992engJournal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-29T00:18:45Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6992Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-29T00:18:45Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
title Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
Güenaga, Katia Ferreira [UNIFESP]
Colorectal surgery
Review
Meta-analysis
Postoperative complications
Anastomotic leak
Cirurgia colorretal
Revisão
Meta-análise
Complicações pós-operatórias
Fístula anastomótica
title_short Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
title_full Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
title_sort Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
author Güenaga, Katia Ferreira [UNIFESP]
author_facet Güenaga, Katia Ferreira [UNIFESP]
Matos, Delcio [UNIFESP]
Wille-Jorgensen, Peer
author_role author
author2 Matos, Delcio [UNIFESP]
Wille-Jorgensen, Peer
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Santos Coloproctology Service
Hospital Ana Costa de Santos Digestive Endoscopy Service
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Colorectal Cancer Group
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Güenaga, Katia Ferreira [UNIFESP]
Matos, Delcio [UNIFESP]
Wille-Jorgensen, Peer
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Colorectal surgery
Review
Meta-analysis
Postoperative complications
Anastomotic leak
Cirurgia colorretal
Revisão
Meta-análise
Complicações pós-operatórias
Fístula anastomótica
topic Colorectal surgery
Review
Meta-analysis
Postoperative complications
Anastomotic leak
Cirurgia colorretal
Revisão
Meta-análise
Complicações pós-operatórias
Fístula anastomótica
description The belief that mechanical bowel preparation is related to the reduction of complications in elective colorectal surgery is based on observational studies and expert opinion. This question led the authors to a systematic literature review, with the completion of meta-analysis, followed by three updates. METHOD: The sources of information were EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, IBECS, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and letters to the authors. The studies were included according to the randomization criteria. The studied variables were: anastomotic dehiscence, mortality and operatory wound infection. The analysis was divided into two comparisons: one group with mechanical preparation (Group A) compared with a group without preparation (Group B) (Comparison I) and a group submitted to rectal enema (Comparison II). RESULTS: We analyzed 5,805 patients in 20 clinical trials. In comparison I, anastomotic leak occurred in 4.4% (101/2,275 patients) in Group A and 4.5% (103/2,258 patients) in Group B. In comparison II, anastomotic leak occurred in 4.4% (27/601 patients) in Group A and 3.4% (21/609 patients) in Group B. CONCLUSION: Despite the inclusion of more studies, evidences found in studies did not show any benefit obtained from the use of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation or rectal cleansing enemas in elective colorectal surgery.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-03-01
2015-06-14T13:43:38Z
2015-06-14T13:43:38Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro). Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia, v. 32, n. 1, p. 7-17, 2012.
10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002
S2237-93632012000100002.pdf
2237-9363
S2237-93632012000100002
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6992
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6992
identifier_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro). Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia, v. 32, n. 1, p. 7-17, 2012.
10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002
S2237-93632012000100002.pdf
2237-9363
S2237-93632012000100002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro)
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 7-17
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268458834067456