Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6992 |
Resumo: | The belief that mechanical bowel preparation is related to the reduction of complications in elective colorectal surgery is based on observational studies and expert opinion. This question led the authors to a systematic literature review, with the completion of meta-analysis, followed by three updates. METHOD: The sources of information were EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, IBECS, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and letters to the authors. The studies were included according to the randomization criteria. The studied variables were: anastomotic dehiscence, mortality and operatory wound infection. The analysis was divided into two comparisons: one group with mechanical preparation (Group A) compared with a group without preparation (Group B) (Comparison I) and a group submitted to rectal enema (Comparison II). RESULTS: We analyzed 5,805 patients in 20 clinical trials. In comparison I, anastomotic leak occurred in 4.4% (101/2,275 patients) in Group A and 4.5% (103/2,258 patients) in Group B. In comparison II, anastomotic leak occurred in 4.4% (27/601 patients) in Group A and 3.4% (21/609 patients) in Group B. CONCLUSION: Despite the inclusion of more studies, evidences found in studies did not show any benefit obtained from the use of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation or rectal cleansing enemas in elective colorectal surgery. |
id |
UFSP_4a94818db793743e20d701df63a61f20 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6992 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysisColorectal surgeryReviewMeta-analysisPostoperative complicationsAnastomotic leakCirurgia colorretalRevisãoMeta-análiseComplicações pós-operatóriasFístula anastomóticaThe belief that mechanical bowel preparation is related to the reduction of complications in elective colorectal surgery is based on observational studies and expert opinion. This question led the authors to a systematic literature review, with the completion of meta-analysis, followed by three updates. METHOD: The sources of information were EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, IBECS, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and letters to the authors. The studies were included according to the randomization criteria. The studied variables were: anastomotic dehiscence, mortality and operatory wound infection. The analysis was divided into two comparisons: one group with mechanical preparation (Group A) compared with a group without preparation (Group B) (Comparison I) and a group submitted to rectal enema (Comparison II). RESULTS: We analyzed 5,805 patients in 20 clinical trials. In comparison I, anastomotic leak occurred in 4.4% (101/2,275 patients) in Group A and 4.5% (103/2,258 patients) in Group B. In comparison II, anastomotic leak occurred in 4.4% (27/601 patients) in Group A and 3.4% (21/609 patients) in Group B. CONCLUSION: Despite the inclusion of more studies, evidences found in studies did not show any benefit obtained from the use of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation or rectal cleansing enemas in elective colorectal surgery.A crença de que o preparo mecânico do cólon está relacionado à diminuição de complicações na cirurgia colorretal eletiva é baseada em estudos observacionais e opinião de especialistas. Seu questionamento motivou os autores na busca sistemática da literatura, com a realização de meta-análise, seguida de três atualizações. MÉTODO: Fontes de informação foram EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, IBECS, Registros de Ensaios Clínicos Casualizados da Colaboração Cochrane e cartas para os autores. Os estudos foram incluídos de acordo com os critérios de casualização. Os desfechos clínicos estudados foram: deiscência anastomótica, mortalidade e infecção da ferida operatória. A análise dos grupos foi dividida em duas comparações: comparação I, grupo submetido a preparo mecânico do cólon (Grupo A) comparado ao grupo sem preparo (Grupo B); comparação II, Grupo A, submetido a preparo do cólon e Grupo B, realizado apenas enema retal. RESULTADOS: Foram analisados 5.805 doentes em 20 ensaios clínicos. Na comparação I, deiscência anastomótica ocorreu em 4,4% (101/2.275 doentes) no Grupo A e 4,5% (103/2.258 doentes) no Grupo B. Na comparação II, deiscência anastomótica ocorreu em 4,4% (27/601 doentes) no Grupo A e 3,4% (21/609 doentes) no Grupo B. CONCLUSÃO: Apesar da inclusão de mais estudos, as evidências encontradas não demonstraram benefício no uso do preparo mecânico pré-operatório do cólon, assim como de enemas de limpeza do reto em cirurgia colorretal eletiva.Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Santos Coloproctology ServiceHospital Ana Costa de Santos Digestive Endoscopy ServiceUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM)Colorectal Cancer GroupUNIFESP, EPMSciELOSociedade Brasileira de ColoproctologiaSanta Casa da Misericórdia de Santos Coloproctology ServiceHospital Ana Costa de Santos Digestive Endoscopy ServiceUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Colorectal Cancer GroupGüenaga, Katia Ferreira [UNIFESP]Matos, Delcio [UNIFESP]Wille-Jorgensen, Peer2015-06-14T13:43:38Z2015-06-14T13:43:38Z2012-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion7-17application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro). Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia, v. 32, n. 1, p. 7-17, 2012.10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002S2237-93632012000100002.pdf2237-9363S2237-93632012000100002http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6992engJournal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-29T00:18:45Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6992Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-29T00:18:45Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
title |
Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis Güenaga, Katia Ferreira [UNIFESP] Colorectal surgery Review Meta-analysis Postoperative complications Anastomotic leak Cirurgia colorretal Revisão Meta-análise Complicações pós-operatórias Fístula anastomótica |
title_short |
Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
author |
Güenaga, Katia Ferreira [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Güenaga, Katia Ferreira [UNIFESP] Matos, Delcio [UNIFESP] Wille-Jorgensen, Peer |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Matos, Delcio [UNIFESP] Wille-Jorgensen, Peer |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Santos Coloproctology Service Hospital Ana Costa de Santos Digestive Endoscopy Service Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Colorectal Cancer Group |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Güenaga, Katia Ferreira [UNIFESP] Matos, Delcio [UNIFESP] Wille-Jorgensen, Peer |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Colorectal surgery Review Meta-analysis Postoperative complications Anastomotic leak Cirurgia colorretal Revisão Meta-análise Complicações pós-operatórias Fístula anastomótica |
topic |
Colorectal surgery Review Meta-analysis Postoperative complications Anastomotic leak Cirurgia colorretal Revisão Meta-análise Complicações pós-operatórias Fístula anastomótica |
description |
The belief that mechanical bowel preparation is related to the reduction of complications in elective colorectal surgery is based on observational studies and expert opinion. This question led the authors to a systematic literature review, with the completion of meta-analysis, followed by three updates. METHOD: The sources of information were EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, IBECS, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and letters to the authors. The studies were included according to the randomization criteria. The studied variables were: anastomotic dehiscence, mortality and operatory wound infection. The analysis was divided into two comparisons: one group with mechanical preparation (Group A) compared with a group without preparation (Group B) (Comparison I) and a group submitted to rectal enema (Comparison II). RESULTS: We analyzed 5,805 patients in 20 clinical trials. In comparison I, anastomotic leak occurred in 4.4% (101/2,275 patients) in Group A and 4.5% (103/2,258 patients) in Group B. In comparison II, anastomotic leak occurred in 4.4% (27/601 patients) in Group A and 3.4% (21/609 patients) in Group B. CONCLUSION: Despite the inclusion of more studies, evidences found in studies did not show any benefit obtained from the use of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation or rectal cleansing enemas in elective colorectal surgery. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-03-01 2015-06-14T13:43:38Z 2015-06-14T13:43:38Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002 Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro). Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia, v. 32, n. 1, p. 7-17, 2012. 10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002 S2237-93632012000100002.pdf 2237-9363 S2237-93632012000100002 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6992 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6992 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro). Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia, v. 32, n. 1, p. 7-17, 2012. 10.1590/S2237-93632012000100002 S2237-93632012000100002.pdf 2237-9363 S2237-93632012000100002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
7-17 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268458834067456 |