Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jacomini, Márcia Aparecida [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6056
Resumo: This paper analyses the opinions of parents and students on social promotion by learning cycles. The field research was conducted in two public school in São Paulo City for a whole school year. Date were collected through observation of everyday school life and from semi-structured interviews with 56 parents and students, and organized into thematic categories, according to Bardin (2004). There were two central questions behind the research: Why are most parents and students against social promotion? How did they reach this way of thinking? The belief that retention exerts a healthy pressure on the students is a general assumption among them. So, for the subjects interviewed, pupils would felt obliged to study more, to behave well and to dedicate themselves to their studies. As the subject's school experiences do not confirm the positive effects of school repetition, they were asked why they continue thinking in this way. Their statements suggest that they have appropriated the dominant discourse, which is against the social promotion policies, without thinking critically about their own school experiences.
id UFSP_54e99339f26c038c69ae205ae9e1088b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6056
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação?Why do most parents and students defend school retention?studentsdemocratization of educationparentsgrade repetitionalunosdemocratização do ensinopaisrepetênciaThis paper analyses the opinions of parents and students on social promotion by learning cycles. The field research was conducted in two public school in São Paulo City for a whole school year. Date were collected through observation of everyday school life and from semi-structured interviews with 56 parents and students, and organized into thematic categories, according to Bardin (2004). There were two central questions behind the research: Why are most parents and students against social promotion? How did they reach this way of thinking? The belief that retention exerts a healthy pressure on the students is a general assumption among them. So, for the subjects interviewed, pupils would felt obliged to study more, to behave well and to dedicate themselves to their studies. As the subject's school experiences do not confirm the positive effects of school repetition, they were asked why they continue thinking in this way. Their statements suggest that they have appropriated the dominant discourse, which is against the social promotion policies, without thinking critically about their own school experiences.O objetivo do artigo é analisar a opinião de pais e alunos sobre a progressão continuada e a reprovação escolar. A pesquisa de campo, realizada em duas escolas municipais de São Paulo, teve duração de um ano letivo. Os dados foram coletados por meio de observação do cotidiano escolar e de entrevistas semiestruturadas com 56 pais e alunos, e organizados em categorias temáticas, de acordo com Bardin (2004). Duas questões centrais pautaram a pesquisa: Por que a maioria dos pais e dos alunos é contra a progressão continuada? Como construíram essa forma de pensar? A crença de que a reprovação exerce uma pressão salutar sobre os alunos que, por temor de perder o ano, estudariam mais e se sentiriam obrigados a ter bom comportamento e dedicação aos estudos, foi preponderante entre os sujeitos. Como as experiências escolares dos sujeitos não confirmam tais efeitos da reprovação anual, questionou-se por que eles continuam pensando assim? Os depoimentos sugerem, entre outros aspectos, que os entrevistados se apropriaram do discurso dominante, contrário às políticas de não reprovação anual, sem refletir criticamente sobre suas próprias experiências de escolarização.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)UNIFESPSciELOFundação Carlos ChagasUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Jacomini, Márcia Aparecida [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:42:00Z2015-06-14T13:42:00Z2010-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion895-919application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012Cadernos de Pesquisa. Fundação Carlos Chagas, v. 40, n. 141, p. 895-919, 2010.10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012S0100-15742010000300012.pdf0100-1574S0100-15742010000300012http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6056porCadernos de Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-28T20:54:05Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6056Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-28T20:54:05Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação?
Why do most parents and students defend school retention?
title Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação?
spellingShingle Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação?
Jacomini, Márcia Aparecida [UNIFESP]
students
democratization of education
parents
grade repetition
alunos
democratização do ensino
pais
repetência
title_short Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação?
title_full Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação?
title_fullStr Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação?
title_full_unstemmed Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação?
title_sort Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação?
author Jacomini, Márcia Aparecida [UNIFESP]
author_facet Jacomini, Márcia Aparecida [UNIFESP]
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jacomini, Márcia Aparecida [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv students
democratization of education
parents
grade repetition
alunos
democratização do ensino
pais
repetência
topic students
democratization of education
parents
grade repetition
alunos
democratização do ensino
pais
repetência
description This paper analyses the opinions of parents and students on social promotion by learning cycles. The field research was conducted in two public school in São Paulo City for a whole school year. Date were collected through observation of everyday school life and from semi-structured interviews with 56 parents and students, and organized into thematic categories, according to Bardin (2004). There were two central questions behind the research: Why are most parents and students against social promotion? How did they reach this way of thinking? The belief that retention exerts a healthy pressure on the students is a general assumption among them. So, for the subjects interviewed, pupils would felt obliged to study more, to behave well and to dedicate themselves to their studies. As the subject's school experiences do not confirm the positive effects of school repetition, they were asked why they continue thinking in this way. Their statements suggest that they have appropriated the dominant discourse, which is against the social promotion policies, without thinking critically about their own school experiences.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-12-01
2015-06-14T13:42:00Z
2015-06-14T13:42:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012
Cadernos de Pesquisa. Fundação Carlos Chagas, v. 40, n. 141, p. 895-919, 2010.
10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012
S0100-15742010000300012.pdf
0100-1574
S0100-15742010000300012
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6056
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6056
identifier_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa. Fundação Carlos Chagas, v. 40, n. 141, p. 895-919, 2010.
10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012
S0100-15742010000300012.pdf
0100-1574
S0100-15742010000300012
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 895-919
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268368331472896