Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6056 |
Resumo: | This paper analyses the opinions of parents and students on social promotion by learning cycles. The field research was conducted in two public school in São Paulo City for a whole school year. Date were collected through observation of everyday school life and from semi-structured interviews with 56 parents and students, and organized into thematic categories, according to Bardin (2004). There were two central questions behind the research: Why are most parents and students against social promotion? How did they reach this way of thinking? The belief that retention exerts a healthy pressure on the students is a general assumption among them. So, for the subjects interviewed, pupils would felt obliged to study more, to behave well and to dedicate themselves to their studies. As the subject's school experiences do not confirm the positive effects of school repetition, they were asked why they continue thinking in this way. Their statements suggest that they have appropriated the dominant discourse, which is against the social promotion policies, without thinking critically about their own school experiences. |
id |
UFSP_54e99339f26c038c69ae205ae9e1088b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6056 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação?Why do most parents and students defend school retention?studentsdemocratization of educationparentsgrade repetitionalunosdemocratização do ensinopaisrepetênciaThis paper analyses the opinions of parents and students on social promotion by learning cycles. The field research was conducted in two public school in São Paulo City for a whole school year. Date were collected through observation of everyday school life and from semi-structured interviews with 56 parents and students, and organized into thematic categories, according to Bardin (2004). There were two central questions behind the research: Why are most parents and students against social promotion? How did they reach this way of thinking? The belief that retention exerts a healthy pressure on the students is a general assumption among them. So, for the subjects interviewed, pupils would felt obliged to study more, to behave well and to dedicate themselves to their studies. As the subject's school experiences do not confirm the positive effects of school repetition, they were asked why they continue thinking in this way. Their statements suggest that they have appropriated the dominant discourse, which is against the social promotion policies, without thinking critically about their own school experiences.O objetivo do artigo é analisar a opinião de pais e alunos sobre a progressão continuada e a reprovação escolar. A pesquisa de campo, realizada em duas escolas municipais de São Paulo, teve duração de um ano letivo. Os dados foram coletados por meio de observação do cotidiano escolar e de entrevistas semiestruturadas com 56 pais e alunos, e organizados em categorias temáticas, de acordo com Bardin (2004). Duas questões centrais pautaram a pesquisa: Por que a maioria dos pais e dos alunos é contra a progressão continuada? Como construíram essa forma de pensar? A crença de que a reprovação exerce uma pressão salutar sobre os alunos que, por temor de perder o ano, estudariam mais e se sentiriam obrigados a ter bom comportamento e dedicação aos estudos, foi preponderante entre os sujeitos. Como as experiências escolares dos sujeitos não confirmam tais efeitos da reprovação anual, questionou-se por que eles continuam pensando assim? Os depoimentos sugerem, entre outros aspectos, que os entrevistados se apropriaram do discurso dominante, contrário às políticas de não reprovação anual, sem refletir criticamente sobre suas próprias experiências de escolarização.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)UNIFESPSciELOFundação Carlos ChagasUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Jacomini, Márcia Aparecida [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:42:00Z2015-06-14T13:42:00Z2010-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion895-919application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012Cadernos de Pesquisa. Fundação Carlos Chagas, v. 40, n. 141, p. 895-919, 2010.10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012S0100-15742010000300012.pdf0100-1574S0100-15742010000300012http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6056porCadernos de Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-28T20:54:05Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6056Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-28T20:54:05Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação? Why do most parents and students defend school retention? |
title |
Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação? |
spellingShingle |
Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação? Jacomini, Márcia Aparecida [UNIFESP] students democratization of education parents grade repetition alunos democratização do ensino pais repetência |
title_short |
Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação? |
title_full |
Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação? |
title_fullStr |
Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação? |
title_sort |
Por que a maioria dos pais e alunos defende a reprovação? |
author |
Jacomini, Márcia Aparecida [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Jacomini, Márcia Aparecida [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Jacomini, Márcia Aparecida [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
students democratization of education parents grade repetition alunos democratização do ensino pais repetência |
topic |
students democratization of education parents grade repetition alunos democratização do ensino pais repetência |
description |
This paper analyses the opinions of parents and students on social promotion by learning cycles. The field research was conducted in two public school in São Paulo City for a whole school year. Date were collected through observation of everyday school life and from semi-structured interviews with 56 parents and students, and organized into thematic categories, according to Bardin (2004). There were two central questions behind the research: Why are most parents and students against social promotion? How did they reach this way of thinking? The belief that retention exerts a healthy pressure on the students is a general assumption among them. So, for the subjects interviewed, pupils would felt obliged to study more, to behave well and to dedicate themselves to their studies. As the subject's school experiences do not confirm the positive effects of school repetition, they were asked why they continue thinking in this way. Their statements suggest that they have appropriated the dominant discourse, which is against the social promotion policies, without thinking critically about their own school experiences. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-12-01 2015-06-14T13:42:00Z 2015-06-14T13:42:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012 Cadernos de Pesquisa. Fundação Carlos Chagas, v. 40, n. 141, p. 895-919, 2010. 10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012 S0100-15742010000300012.pdf 0100-1574 S0100-15742010000300012 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6056 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6056 |
identifier_str_mv |
Cadernos de Pesquisa. Fundação Carlos Chagas, v. 40, n. 141, p. 895-919, 2010. 10.1590/S0100-15742010000300012 S0100-15742010000300012.pdf 0100-1574 S0100-15742010000300012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Pesquisa |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
895-919 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Carlos Chagas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Carlos Chagas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268368331472896 |