Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marchi, Nino C.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Scherer, Juliana N., Pachado, Mayra P., Guimaraes, Luciano S., Siegmund, Gerson, de Castro, Melina N., Halpern, Silvia, Benzano, Daniela, Formigoni, Maria L. [UNIFESP], Cruz, Marcelo, Pechansky, Flavio, Kessler, Felix H.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/57227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2091
Resumo: Objective: Many studies correlate characteristics of family functioning and the development of drug addiction. This study sought to evaluate and compare the family environment styles of two groups of psychoactive substance users: 1) alcohol-only users and 2) crack-cocaine users. Methods: Three hundred and sixty-four users of alcohol, crack-cocaine, and other drugs, recruited from research centers in four Brazilian capitals participated in this study. Subjects were evaluated through the Family Environment Scale and the Addiction Severity Index, 6th version (ASI-6). ASI-6 t-scores were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests. A final model was obtained using a logistic regression analysis. All analyses were adjusted for partner, age, and psychiatric t-score. Results: We found a significant difference between groups in the cohesion subscale (p = 0.044). The post-hoc test revealed a difference of 1.06 points (95% CI 0.11-2.01) between groups 1 (6.45 +/- 0.28) and 2 (5.38 +/- 0.20). No significant between-group differences were observed in the other subscales. However, categorical analyses of variables regarding family dynamic showed that crack users more often reported that sometimes people in their family hit each other (30.4% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.007) and that people in their family frequently compared each other regarding work and/or school achievement (57.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.041). Conclusion: These results suggest that families of crack-cocaine users are less cohesive than families of alcohol users. This type of family environment may affect treatment outcome, and should thus be adequately approached.
id UFSP_9f19aeef2e501d87f3a1059868969c6f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/57227
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Marchi, Nino C.Scherer, Juliana N.Pachado, Mayra P.Guimaraes, Luciano S.Siegmund, Gersonde Castro, Melina N.Halpern, SilviaBenzano, DanielaFormigoni, Maria L. [UNIFESP]Cruz, MarceloPechansky, FlavioKessler, Felix H.2020-08-04T13:40:00Z2020-08-04T13:40:00Z2017Revista Brasileira De Psiquiatria. Sao Paulo, v. 39, n. 4, p. 346-351, 2017.1516-4446https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/57227http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2091S1516-44462017000400346.pdfS1516-4446201700040034610.1590/1516-4446-2016-2091WOS:000415387500013Objective: Many studies correlate characteristics of family functioning and the development of drug addiction. This study sought to evaluate and compare the family environment styles of two groups of psychoactive substance users: 1) alcohol-only users and 2) crack-cocaine users. Methods: Three hundred and sixty-four users of alcohol, crack-cocaine, and other drugs, recruited from research centers in four Brazilian capitals participated in this study. Subjects were evaluated through the Family Environment Scale and the Addiction Severity Index, 6th version (ASI-6). ASI-6 t-scores were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests. A final model was obtained using a logistic regression analysis. All analyses were adjusted for partner, age, and psychiatric t-score. Results: We found a significant difference between groups in the cohesion subscale (p = 0.044). The post-hoc test revealed a difference of 1.06 points (95% CI 0.11-2.01) between groups 1 (6.45 +/- 0.28) and 2 (5.38 +/- 0.20). No significant between-group differences were observed in the other subscales. However, categorical analyses of variables regarding family dynamic showed that crack users more often reported that sometimes people in their family hit each other (30.4% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.007) and that people in their family frequently compared each other regarding work and/or school achievement (57.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.041). Conclusion: These results suggest that families of crack-cocaine users are less cohesive than families of alcohol users. This type of family environment may affect treatment outcome, and should thus be adequately approached.SENADNational Institutes of Health/National Institute on Drug AbuseUniv Fed Rio do Grande UFRGS, HCPA, CPAD, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilHCPA, Unidade Bioestat, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilUniv Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Lab Biossinais Fenomenol & Cognicao, Inst Psicol, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Psicobiol, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Rio de Janeiro UFRJ, Inst Psiquiatria, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Psicobiol, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilSENAD: TC 005/2005Web of Science346-351engAssoc Brasileira PsiquiatriaRevista Brasileira De PsiquiatriaFamilyfamily relationshipscohesionsubstance abusealcohol usecrack-cocaine useCrack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol usersinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleSao Paulo394info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPORIGINALS1516-44462017000400346.pdfapplication/pdf83109${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57227/1/S1516-44462017000400346.pdf914026034e6f4ac2c738d6398346e9a5MD51open accessTEXTS1516-44462017000400346.pdf.txtS1516-44462017000400346.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain28652${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57227/2/S1516-44462017000400346.pdf.txt19cfbbe99e5351e4c9598591ee2de1cdMD52open accessTHUMBNAILS1516-44462017000400346.pdf.jpgS1516-44462017000400346.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6245${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57227/4/S1516-44462017000400346.pdf.jpg79cc7ab1639a854c579a110fac634b42MD54open access11600/572272022-07-31 21:49:12.462open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/57227Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652022-08-01T00:49:12Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
title Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
spellingShingle Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
Marchi, Nino C.
Family
family relationships
cohesion
substance abuse
alcohol use
crack-cocaine use
title_short Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
title_full Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
title_fullStr Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
title_full_unstemmed Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
title_sort Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
author Marchi, Nino C.
author_facet Marchi, Nino C.
Scherer, Juliana N.
Pachado, Mayra P.
Guimaraes, Luciano S.
Siegmund, Gerson
de Castro, Melina N.
Halpern, Silvia
Benzano, Daniela
Formigoni, Maria L. [UNIFESP]
Cruz, Marcelo
Pechansky, Flavio
Kessler, Felix H.
author_role author
author2 Scherer, Juliana N.
Pachado, Mayra P.
Guimaraes, Luciano S.
Siegmund, Gerson
de Castro, Melina N.
Halpern, Silvia
Benzano, Daniela
Formigoni, Maria L. [UNIFESP]
Cruz, Marcelo
Pechansky, Flavio
Kessler, Felix H.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marchi, Nino C.
Scherer, Juliana N.
Pachado, Mayra P.
Guimaraes, Luciano S.
Siegmund, Gerson
de Castro, Melina N.
Halpern, Silvia
Benzano, Daniela
Formigoni, Maria L. [UNIFESP]
Cruz, Marcelo
Pechansky, Flavio
Kessler, Felix H.
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Family
family relationships
cohesion
substance abuse
alcohol use
crack-cocaine use
topic Family
family relationships
cohesion
substance abuse
alcohol use
crack-cocaine use
description Objective: Many studies correlate characteristics of family functioning and the development of drug addiction. This study sought to evaluate and compare the family environment styles of two groups of psychoactive substance users: 1) alcohol-only users and 2) crack-cocaine users. Methods: Three hundred and sixty-four users of alcohol, crack-cocaine, and other drugs, recruited from research centers in four Brazilian capitals participated in this study. Subjects were evaluated through the Family Environment Scale and the Addiction Severity Index, 6th version (ASI-6). ASI-6 t-scores were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests. A final model was obtained using a logistic regression analysis. All analyses were adjusted for partner, age, and psychiatric t-score. Results: We found a significant difference between groups in the cohesion subscale (p = 0.044). The post-hoc test revealed a difference of 1.06 points (95% CI 0.11-2.01) between groups 1 (6.45 +/- 0.28) and 2 (5.38 +/- 0.20). No significant between-group differences were observed in the other subscales. However, categorical analyses of variables regarding family dynamic showed that crack users more often reported that sometimes people in their family hit each other (30.4% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.007) and that people in their family frequently compared each other regarding work and/or school achievement (57.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.041). Conclusion: These results suggest that families of crack-cocaine users are less cohesive than families of alcohol users. This type of family environment may affect treatment outcome, and should thus be adequately approached.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-08-04T13:40:00Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-08-04T13:40:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Psiquiatria. Sao Paulo, v. 39, n. 4, p. 346-351, 2017.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/57227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2091
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1516-4446
dc.identifier.file.none.fl_str_mv S1516-44462017000400346.pdf
dc.identifier.scielo.none.fl_str_mv S1516-44462017000400346
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2091
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000415387500013
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Psiquiatria. Sao Paulo, v. 39, n. 4, p. 346-351, 2017.
1516-4446
S1516-44462017000400346.pdf
S1516-44462017000400346
10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2091
WOS:000415387500013
url https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/57227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2091
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Psiquiatria
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 346-351
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Assoc Brasileira Psiquiatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Assoc Brasileira Psiquiatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57227/1/S1516-44462017000400346.pdf
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57227/2/S1516-44462017000400346.pdf.txt
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57227/4/S1516-44462017000400346.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 914026034e6f4ac2c738d6398346e9a5
19cfbbe99e5351e4c9598591ee2de1cd
79cc7ab1639a854c579a110fac634b42
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802764131861790720