Prevalence of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3/internal tandem duplication (FLT3/ITD+) in de novo acute myeloid leukemia patients categorized according to cytogenetic risk

• Autor(a) principal: Krum, Everson Augusto
• Data de Publicação: 2009
• Outros Autores: Yamamoto, Mihoko [UNIFESP], Chauffaille, Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
• dARK ID: ark:/48912/001300001brhp
• DOI: 10.1590/S1516-31802009000100006
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802009000100006; http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4784
• topic: Receptor protein - tyrosine kinase; Leukemia, myeloid, acute; Cytogenetic analysis; Prognosis; Polymerase chain reaction; Receptores proteína tirosina quinases; Leucemia mielóide aguda; Análise citogenética; Prognóstico; Reação em cadeia da polimerase

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The mechanism involved in leukemogenesis remains unclear and more information about the disruption of the cell proliferation, cell differentiation and apoptosis of neoplastic cells is required. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional prevalence study at the Discipline of Hematology, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: We investigated FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3/internal tandem duplication (FLT3/ITD+) in 40 adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), categorized according to cytogenetic results, from September 2001 to May 2005. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (32.5%) were classified as presenting the favorable karyotype, 11 patients (27.5%) as an intermediate group, 7 patients (17%) as an undefined group and 9 patients (22.5%) as the unfavorable group. FLT3/ITD+ was found in 10 patients (25%): 3 with FLT3/ITD+ and favorable karyotype; 4 with FLT3/ITD+ and intermediate karyotype; 2 with FLT3/ITD+ and undefined karyotype; and only 1 with FLT3/ITD+ and unfavorable karyotype. Among the patients without FLT3/ITD+, 10 presented favorable karyotype, 8 intermediate, 4 undefined and 8 unfavorable karyotype. The cytogenetic results showed no correlations between FLT3/ITD presence and the prognostic groups (P = 0.13). We found that 2 patients were still alive more than 24 months later, FLT3/ITD+ did not influence the patients' survival rate. CONCLUSION: We found the same frequency of AML with FLT3/ITD+ in both the favorable and intermediate prognosis groups. Only one patient presented AML, FLT3/ITD+ and unfavorable karyotype (the hypothetical worst clinical situation). Therefore, the prognostic advantage of favorable cytogenetics among patients with FLT3/ITD+ remains to be elucidated, for it to be better understood.