Detection and Gram Discrimination of Bacterial Pathogens from Aqueous and Vitreous Humor Using Real-Time PCR Assays

• Autor(a) principal: Bispo, Paulo José Martins [UNIFESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2011
• Outros Autores: Melo, Gustavo Barreto de [UNIFESP], Hofling-Lima, Ana Luisa [UNIFESP], Pignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5712; http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33396

PURPOSE. To develop and apply real-time PCR protocols to the detection and classification of the Gram status of bacterial pathogens in aqueous and vitreous humor collected from clinically suspected intraocular infectionsMETHODS. the analytical specificity of two PCR assays, SYBR Green 16S rDNA-Based Universal PCR (SGRU-PCR), and a Multiplex Gram-Specific TaqMan-Based PCR (MGST-PCR), was determined with 31 clinically important pathogens, including 20 Gram-positive and 11 Gram-negative. Analytical sensitivity was determined with a 10-fold dilution of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli DNA. Assays were further tested on aqueous (n = 10) and vitreous humor (n = 11) samples collected from patients with clinically diagnosed intraocular infections.RESULTS. DNA was amplified from all control bacterial isolates when using SGRU-PCR. MGST-PCR correctly classified the Gram status of all these isolates. the SGRU-PCR limit of detection of S. epidermidis and E. coli DNA was 100 fg/mu L (E = 0.82 and 0.86; r(2) = 0.99) and for MGST-PCR, 1 pg/mu L (E = 0.66 and 0.70; r(2) = 0.99. for clinical intraocular samples, positivity of culture was 47.6% and for real-time PCR assays, 95.2%. Gram classification was achieved in 100% of MGST-PCR-positive samples. Among microbiologically negative samples, real-time PCR assays were positive in 90% of cases. the false-positive rate in control aqueous was 3.2%, and control samples of vitreous were negative.CONCLUSIONS. the real-time PCR assays demonstrated good correlation, with culture-proven results. With the use of these methods, bacterial detection was improved from 47.6% to 95.3%, demonstrating them to be sensitive, rapid tests for diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:873-881) DOI:10.1167/iovs.10-5712