Tipo de estímulo e memória de trabalho fonológica

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lobo, Fernanda Senna
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Acrani, Isabela Olszanski [UNIFESP], Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão de [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462008000400006
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4682
Resumo: PURPOSE: to investigate the influence of the type of linguistic stimulus presentation on phonological memory. METHODS: 27 2nd grade students of a public elementary school with ages ranging between 7 and 8-years old were assessed (59.25% girls). The students had no history or complaints of neurological, cognitive or auditory deficits. The children passed the Auditory Processing Simplified Assessment and were submitted to a syllable or pseudo-word repetition task. The stimuli were recorded and presented as: I) fluent - (pseudo-words presented within a 10-second interval) - presented to 13 students, and II) syllabic - 01-second intervals between syllables and 10-second intervals between each series - presented to 14 students. The repetitions were transcribed; the errors were marked, analyzed and compared according to gender and stimuli presentation pattern. RESULTS: according to the analysis, a one syllable difference was observed, with a better performance when the second list was presented and starting with the 5 syllable stimuli, a higher percentage of correct answers on list 1, when compared to list 2. Gender comparison showed significant differences for the 5 syllables stimuli on the general analysis and on list 2, with better results for boys. CONCLUSION: there was no difference in performance up to the extension of 4 syllables. The presentation of the fluent form facilitated phonological memory performance for both male and female students when the presented stimuli were longer.
id UFSP_c97af16c8fe9bc47b78e5613164fb33d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/4682
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Tipo de estímulo e memória de trabalho fonológicaType of stimulus and phonological working memoryMemoryLanguagePsycholinguisticsMemóriaLinguagemPsicolingüísticaPURPOSE: to investigate the influence of the type of linguistic stimulus presentation on phonological memory. METHODS: 27 2nd grade students of a public elementary school with ages ranging between 7 and 8-years old were assessed (59.25% girls). The students had no history or complaints of neurological, cognitive or auditory deficits. The children passed the Auditory Processing Simplified Assessment and were submitted to a syllable or pseudo-word repetition task. The stimuli were recorded and presented as: I) fluent - (pseudo-words presented within a 10-second interval) - presented to 13 students, and II) syllabic - 01-second intervals between syllables and 10-second intervals between each series - presented to 14 students. The repetitions were transcribed; the errors were marked, analyzed and compared according to gender and stimuli presentation pattern. RESULTS: according to the analysis, a one syllable difference was observed, with a better performance when the second list was presented and starting with the 5 syllable stimuli, a higher percentage of correct answers on list 1, when compared to list 2. Gender comparison showed significant differences for the 5 syllables stimuli on the general analysis and on list 2, with better results for boys. CONCLUSION: there was no difference in performance up to the extension of 4 syllables. The presentation of the fluent form facilitated phonological memory performance for both male and female students when the presented stimuli were longer.OBJETIVO: investigar a influência do modo de apresentação do estímulo lingüístico sobre a memória de trabalho fonológica. MÉTODOS: avaliaram-se 27 escolares (59,25% meninas) entre sete anos, sete meses e oito anos, sete meses, da 2ª série do Ensino Fundamental de Escola Pública, sem histórico de retenção, ou queixas de déficits neurológicos, cognitivos ou auditivos. Passaram na Avaliação Simplificada do Processamento Auditivo e foram submetidos à tarefa de repetição de sílabas ou pseudopalavras. Os estímulos foram gravados e apresentados como: I) fluentes: lista de pseudopalavras, com intervalos de dez segundos entre uma e outra, apresentada a 13 escolares, e II) silabados, lista apresentada a 14 escolares, com intervalo de um segundo entre cada sílaba e dez segundos entre cada seqüência. As repetições foram transcritas, os erros assinalados e comparados segundo o sexo e o modo de apresentação do estímulo. RESULTADOS: na análise geral do desempenho notou-se diferença, com melhor desempenho na apresentação da lista II e, a partir dos estímulos de cinco sílabas, maiores porcentagens de acerto na apresentação da lista I, quando comparada à II. A comparação entre os sexos mostrou diferença significante para estímulos de cinco sílabas na análise geral e da lista II, com melhores resultados dos meninos. CONCLUSÃO: não houve diferença de desempenho até a extensão de quatro sílabas. A apresentação na forma fluente facilitou o desempenho da memória fonológica de trabalho dos escolares do sexo masculino e feminino quando os estímulos apresentados foram mais extensos.Faculdade Santa MarcelinaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Departamento de FonoaudiologiaUNIFESP, Depto. de FonoaudiologiaSciELOCEFAC Saúde e EducaçãoFaculdade Santa MarcelinaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Lobo, Fernanda SennaAcrani, Isabela Olszanski [UNIFESP]Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão de [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:38:52Z2015-06-14T13:38:52Z2008-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion461-470application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462008000400006Revista CEFAC. CEFAC Saúde e Educação, v. 10, n. 4, p. 461-470, 2008.10.1590/S1516-18462008000400006S1516-18462008000400006.pdf1516-1846S1516-18462008000400006http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4682porRevista CEFACinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-30T00:20:34Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/4682Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-30T00:20:34Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tipo de estímulo e memória de trabalho fonológica
Type of stimulus and phonological working memory
title Tipo de estímulo e memória de trabalho fonológica
spellingShingle Tipo de estímulo e memória de trabalho fonológica
Lobo, Fernanda Senna
Memory
Language
Psycholinguistics
Memória
Linguagem
Psicolingüística
title_short Tipo de estímulo e memória de trabalho fonológica
title_full Tipo de estímulo e memória de trabalho fonológica
title_fullStr Tipo de estímulo e memória de trabalho fonológica
title_full_unstemmed Tipo de estímulo e memória de trabalho fonológica
title_sort Tipo de estímulo e memória de trabalho fonológica
author Lobo, Fernanda Senna
author_facet Lobo, Fernanda Senna
Acrani, Isabela Olszanski [UNIFESP]
Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão de [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Acrani, Isabela Olszanski [UNIFESP]
Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão de [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade Santa Marcelina
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lobo, Fernanda Senna
Acrani, Isabela Olszanski [UNIFESP]
Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão de [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Memory
Language
Psycholinguistics
Memória
Linguagem
Psicolingüística
topic Memory
Language
Psycholinguistics
Memória
Linguagem
Psicolingüística
description PURPOSE: to investigate the influence of the type of linguistic stimulus presentation on phonological memory. METHODS: 27 2nd grade students of a public elementary school with ages ranging between 7 and 8-years old were assessed (59.25% girls). The students had no history or complaints of neurological, cognitive or auditory deficits. The children passed the Auditory Processing Simplified Assessment and were submitted to a syllable or pseudo-word repetition task. The stimuli were recorded and presented as: I) fluent - (pseudo-words presented within a 10-second interval) - presented to 13 students, and II) syllabic - 01-second intervals between syllables and 10-second intervals between each series - presented to 14 students. The repetitions were transcribed; the errors were marked, analyzed and compared according to gender and stimuli presentation pattern. RESULTS: according to the analysis, a one syllable difference was observed, with a better performance when the second list was presented and starting with the 5 syllable stimuli, a higher percentage of correct answers on list 1, when compared to list 2. Gender comparison showed significant differences for the 5 syllables stimuli on the general analysis and on list 2, with better results for boys. CONCLUSION: there was no difference in performance up to the extension of 4 syllables. The presentation of the fluent form facilitated phonological memory performance for both male and female students when the presented stimuli were longer.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-12-01
2015-06-14T13:38:52Z
2015-06-14T13:38:52Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462008000400006
Revista CEFAC. CEFAC Saúde e Educação, v. 10, n. 4, p. 461-470, 2008.
10.1590/S1516-18462008000400006
S1516-18462008000400006.pdf
1516-1846
S1516-18462008000400006
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4682
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462008000400006
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4682
identifier_str_mv Revista CEFAC. CEFAC Saúde e Educação, v. 10, n. 4, p. 461-470, 2008.
10.1590/S1516-18462008000400006
S1516-18462008000400006.pdf
1516-1846
S1516-18462008000400006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 461-470
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv CEFAC Saúde e Educação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv CEFAC Saúde e Educação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268363292016640