Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0395-x https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55263 |
Resumo: | Background: To analyze the most common neurophthalmological conditions that may mimic glaucomatous optic neuropathy and to determine which most often lead to misdiagnosis when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist. Methods: We reviewed the charts of consecutive patients with optic neuropathies caused by neurophthalmological conditions screened in a single Eye Clinic within a period of 24 months. Within these enrolled patients, we selected the eyes whose fundoscopic appearance could resemble glaucoma based in pre-defined criteria (vertical cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.6, asymmetry of the cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.2 between eyes, presence of localized retinal nerve fiber layer and/or neuroretinal rim defects, and disc haemorrhages). Then, color fundus photographs and Humphrey Visual Field tests (HVF) of these eyes were mixed with tests from 21 consecutive glaucomatous patients (42 eyes with normal tension glaucoma). These images were mixed randomly and a masked glaucoma specialist was asked to distinguish if each set of exams was from a patient with glaucoma or with a neurophthalmologic condition. Results: Among the 101 eyes (68 patients) enrolled with neurophthalmological diseases, 16 (15.8%) were classified as conditions that could mimic glaucoma. The most common diagnoses were ischemic optic neuropathy (25%), compressive optic neuropathy (18.7%) and hereditary optic neuropathy (18.7%). Based on the analysis of fundus photographs and HVF tests, 25% of these were misdiagnosed as glaucoma (two ischemic optic neuropathies and two congenital optic disc anomalies). Conversely, 11.9% of the glaucomatous neuropathies were misdiagnosed as neurophthalmological disorders. Overall, the glaucoma specialist correctly diagnosed 84.5% of the eyes. Conclusions: Some neurophthalmological disorders can mimic glaucoma. In our study, isquemic and compressive optic neuropathies were the ones that most often did so. Almost one quarter of the eyes were misdiagnosed when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist, which can lead to inadequate management and influence the prognosis of these patients. |
id |
UFSP_cfee53cb5d55a1107af362252edf4eb5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/55263 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosisOptic discNeuro-ophthalmology: diagnosisIntraocular pressureBackground: To analyze the most common neurophthalmological conditions that may mimic glaucomatous optic neuropathy and to determine which most often lead to misdiagnosis when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist. Methods: We reviewed the charts of consecutive patients with optic neuropathies caused by neurophthalmological conditions screened in a single Eye Clinic within a period of 24 months. Within these enrolled patients, we selected the eyes whose fundoscopic appearance could resemble glaucoma based in pre-defined criteria (vertical cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.6, asymmetry of the cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.2 between eyes, presence of localized retinal nerve fiber layer and/or neuroretinal rim defects, and disc haemorrhages). Then, color fundus photographs and Humphrey Visual Field tests (HVF) of these eyes were mixed with tests from 21 consecutive glaucomatous patients (42 eyes with normal tension glaucoma). These images were mixed randomly and a masked glaucoma specialist was asked to distinguish if each set of exams was from a patient with glaucoma or with a neurophthalmologic condition. Results: Among the 101 eyes (68 patients) enrolled with neurophthalmological diseases, 16 (15.8%) were classified as conditions that could mimic glaucoma. The most common diagnoses were ischemic optic neuropathy (25%), compressive optic neuropathy (18.7%) and hereditary optic neuropathy (18.7%). Based on the analysis of fundus photographs and HVF tests, 25% of these were misdiagnosed as glaucoma (two ischemic optic neuropathies and two congenital optic disc anomalies). Conversely, 11.9% of the glaucomatous neuropathies were misdiagnosed as neurophthalmological disorders. Overall, the glaucoma specialist correctly diagnosed 84.5% of the eyes. Conclusions: Some neurophthalmological disorders can mimic glaucoma. In our study, isquemic and compressive optic neuropathies were the ones that most often did so. Almost one quarter of the eyes were misdiagnosed when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist, which can lead to inadequate management and influence the prognosis of these patients.Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, BrazilHosp Med Olhos, Glaucoma Unit, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, BrazilMayo Clin, Dept Ophthalmol, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USAUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceBiomed Central Ltd2020-07-17T14:03:15Z2020-07-17T14:03:15Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0395-xBmc Ophthalmology. London, v. 17, p. -, 2017.10.1186/s12886-016-0395-xWOS000391512600002.pdf1471-2415https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55263WOS:000391512600002engBmc OphthalmologyLondoninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDias, Diego Torres [UNIFESP]Ushida, Michele [UNIFESP]Battistella, RobertoDorairaj, SyrilPrata, Tiago Santos [UNIFESP]reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-11T06:33:20Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/55263Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-11T06:33:20Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis |
title |
Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis |
spellingShingle |
Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis Dias, Diego Torres [UNIFESP] Optic disc Neuro-ophthalmology: diagnosis Intraocular pressure |
title_short |
Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis |
title_full |
Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis |
title_fullStr |
Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis |
title_sort |
Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis |
author |
Dias, Diego Torres [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Dias, Diego Torres [UNIFESP] Ushida, Michele [UNIFESP] Battistella, Roberto Dorairaj, Syril Prata, Tiago Santos [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ushida, Michele [UNIFESP] Battistella, Roberto Dorairaj, Syril Prata, Tiago Santos [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dias, Diego Torres [UNIFESP] Ushida, Michele [UNIFESP] Battistella, Roberto Dorairaj, Syril Prata, Tiago Santos [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Optic disc Neuro-ophthalmology: diagnosis Intraocular pressure |
topic |
Optic disc Neuro-ophthalmology: diagnosis Intraocular pressure |
description |
Background: To analyze the most common neurophthalmological conditions that may mimic glaucomatous optic neuropathy and to determine which most often lead to misdiagnosis when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist. Methods: We reviewed the charts of consecutive patients with optic neuropathies caused by neurophthalmological conditions screened in a single Eye Clinic within a period of 24 months. Within these enrolled patients, we selected the eyes whose fundoscopic appearance could resemble glaucoma based in pre-defined criteria (vertical cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.6, asymmetry of the cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.2 between eyes, presence of localized retinal nerve fiber layer and/or neuroretinal rim defects, and disc haemorrhages). Then, color fundus photographs and Humphrey Visual Field tests (HVF) of these eyes were mixed with tests from 21 consecutive glaucomatous patients (42 eyes with normal tension glaucoma). These images were mixed randomly and a masked glaucoma specialist was asked to distinguish if each set of exams was from a patient with glaucoma or with a neurophthalmologic condition. Results: Among the 101 eyes (68 patients) enrolled with neurophthalmological diseases, 16 (15.8%) were classified as conditions that could mimic glaucoma. The most common diagnoses were ischemic optic neuropathy (25%), compressive optic neuropathy (18.7%) and hereditary optic neuropathy (18.7%). Based on the analysis of fundus photographs and HVF tests, 25% of these were misdiagnosed as glaucoma (two ischemic optic neuropathies and two congenital optic disc anomalies). Conversely, 11.9% of the glaucomatous neuropathies were misdiagnosed as neurophthalmological disorders. Overall, the glaucoma specialist correctly diagnosed 84.5% of the eyes. Conclusions: Some neurophthalmological disorders can mimic glaucoma. In our study, isquemic and compressive optic neuropathies were the ones that most often did so. Almost one quarter of the eyes were misdiagnosed when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist, which can lead to inadequate management and influence the prognosis of these patients. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2020-07-17T14:03:15Z 2020-07-17T14:03:15Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0395-x Bmc Ophthalmology. London, v. 17, p. -, 2017. 10.1186/s12886-016-0395-x WOS000391512600002.pdf 1471-2415 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55263 WOS:000391512600002 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0395-x https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55263 |
identifier_str_mv |
Bmc Ophthalmology. London, v. 17, p. -, 2017. 10.1186/s12886-016-0395-x WOS000391512600002.pdf 1471-2415 WOS:000391512600002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Bmc Ophthalmology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
- application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
London |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biomed Central Ltd |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biomed Central Ltd |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268376736858112 |