Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dias, Diego Torres [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Ushida, Michele [UNIFESP], Battistella, Roberto, Dorairaj, Syril, Prata, Tiago Santos [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0395-x
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55263
Resumo: Background: To analyze the most common neurophthalmological conditions that may mimic glaucomatous optic neuropathy and to determine which most often lead to misdiagnosis when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist. Methods: We reviewed the charts of consecutive patients with optic neuropathies caused by neurophthalmological conditions screened in a single Eye Clinic within a period of 24 months. Within these enrolled patients, we selected the eyes whose fundoscopic appearance could resemble glaucoma based in pre-defined criteria (vertical cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.6, asymmetry of the cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.2 between eyes, presence of localized retinal nerve fiber layer and/or neuroretinal rim defects, and disc haemorrhages). Then, color fundus photographs and Humphrey Visual Field tests (HVF) of these eyes were mixed with tests from 21 consecutive glaucomatous patients (42 eyes with normal tension glaucoma). These images were mixed randomly and a masked glaucoma specialist was asked to distinguish if each set of exams was from a patient with glaucoma or with a neurophthalmologic condition. Results: Among the 101 eyes (68 patients) enrolled with neurophthalmological diseases, 16 (15.8%) were classified as conditions that could mimic glaucoma. The most common diagnoses were ischemic optic neuropathy (25%), compressive optic neuropathy (18.7%) and hereditary optic neuropathy (18.7%). Based on the analysis of fundus photographs and HVF tests, 25% of these were misdiagnosed as glaucoma (two ischemic optic neuropathies and two congenital optic disc anomalies). Conversely, 11.9% of the glaucomatous neuropathies were misdiagnosed as neurophthalmological disorders. Overall, the glaucoma specialist correctly diagnosed 84.5% of the eyes. Conclusions: Some neurophthalmological disorders can mimic glaucoma. In our study, isquemic and compressive optic neuropathies were the ones that most often did so. Almost one quarter of the eyes were misdiagnosed when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist, which can lead to inadequate management and influence the prognosis of these patients.
id UFSP_cfee53cb5d55a1107af362252edf4eb5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/55263
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosisOptic discNeuro-ophthalmology: diagnosisIntraocular pressureBackground: To analyze the most common neurophthalmological conditions that may mimic glaucomatous optic neuropathy and to determine which most often lead to misdiagnosis when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist. Methods: We reviewed the charts of consecutive patients with optic neuropathies caused by neurophthalmological conditions screened in a single Eye Clinic within a period of 24 months. Within these enrolled patients, we selected the eyes whose fundoscopic appearance could resemble glaucoma based in pre-defined criteria (vertical cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.6, asymmetry of the cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.2 between eyes, presence of localized retinal nerve fiber layer and/or neuroretinal rim defects, and disc haemorrhages). Then, color fundus photographs and Humphrey Visual Field tests (HVF) of these eyes were mixed with tests from 21 consecutive glaucomatous patients (42 eyes with normal tension glaucoma). These images were mixed randomly and a masked glaucoma specialist was asked to distinguish if each set of exams was from a patient with glaucoma or with a neurophthalmologic condition. Results: Among the 101 eyes (68 patients) enrolled with neurophthalmological diseases, 16 (15.8%) were classified as conditions that could mimic glaucoma. The most common diagnoses were ischemic optic neuropathy (25%), compressive optic neuropathy (18.7%) and hereditary optic neuropathy (18.7%). Based on the analysis of fundus photographs and HVF tests, 25% of these were misdiagnosed as glaucoma (two ischemic optic neuropathies and two congenital optic disc anomalies). Conversely, 11.9% of the glaucomatous neuropathies were misdiagnosed as neurophthalmological disorders. Overall, the glaucoma specialist correctly diagnosed 84.5% of the eyes. Conclusions: Some neurophthalmological disorders can mimic glaucoma. In our study, isquemic and compressive optic neuropathies were the ones that most often did so. Almost one quarter of the eyes were misdiagnosed when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist, which can lead to inadequate management and influence the prognosis of these patients.Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, BrazilHosp Med Olhos, Glaucoma Unit, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, BrazilMayo Clin, Dept Ophthalmol, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USAUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceBiomed Central Ltd2020-07-17T14:03:15Z2020-07-17T14:03:15Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0395-xBmc Ophthalmology. London, v. 17, p. -, 2017.10.1186/s12886-016-0395-xWOS000391512600002.pdf1471-2415https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55263WOS:000391512600002engBmc OphthalmologyLondoninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDias, Diego Torres [UNIFESP]Ushida, Michele [UNIFESP]Battistella, RobertoDorairaj, SyrilPrata, Tiago Santos [UNIFESP]reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-11T06:33:20Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/55263Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-11T06:33:20Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis
title Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis
spellingShingle Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis
Dias, Diego Torres [UNIFESP]
Optic disc
Neuro-ophthalmology: diagnosis
Intraocular pressure
title_short Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis
title_full Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis
title_fullStr Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis
title_sort Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis
author Dias, Diego Torres [UNIFESP]
author_facet Dias, Diego Torres [UNIFESP]
Ushida, Michele [UNIFESP]
Battistella, Roberto
Dorairaj, Syril
Prata, Tiago Santos [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Ushida, Michele [UNIFESP]
Battistella, Roberto
Dorairaj, Syril
Prata, Tiago Santos [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, Diego Torres [UNIFESP]
Ushida, Michele [UNIFESP]
Battistella, Roberto
Dorairaj, Syril
Prata, Tiago Santos [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Optic disc
Neuro-ophthalmology: diagnosis
Intraocular pressure
topic Optic disc
Neuro-ophthalmology: diagnosis
Intraocular pressure
description Background: To analyze the most common neurophthalmological conditions that may mimic glaucomatous optic neuropathy and to determine which most often lead to misdiagnosis when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist. Methods: We reviewed the charts of consecutive patients with optic neuropathies caused by neurophthalmological conditions screened in a single Eye Clinic within a period of 24 months. Within these enrolled patients, we selected the eyes whose fundoscopic appearance could resemble glaucoma based in pre-defined criteria (vertical cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.6, asymmetry of the cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.2 between eyes, presence of localized retinal nerve fiber layer and/or neuroretinal rim defects, and disc haemorrhages). Then, color fundus photographs and Humphrey Visual Field tests (HVF) of these eyes were mixed with tests from 21 consecutive glaucomatous patients (42 eyes with normal tension glaucoma). These images were mixed randomly and a masked glaucoma specialist was asked to distinguish if each set of exams was from a patient with glaucoma or with a neurophthalmologic condition. Results: Among the 101 eyes (68 patients) enrolled with neurophthalmological diseases, 16 (15.8%) were classified as conditions that could mimic glaucoma. The most common diagnoses were ischemic optic neuropathy (25%), compressive optic neuropathy (18.7%) and hereditary optic neuropathy (18.7%). Based on the analysis of fundus photographs and HVF tests, 25% of these were misdiagnosed as glaucoma (two ischemic optic neuropathies and two congenital optic disc anomalies). Conversely, 11.9% of the glaucomatous neuropathies were misdiagnosed as neurophthalmological disorders. Overall, the glaucoma specialist correctly diagnosed 84.5% of the eyes. Conclusions: Some neurophthalmological disorders can mimic glaucoma. In our study, isquemic and compressive optic neuropathies were the ones that most often did so. Almost one quarter of the eyes were misdiagnosed when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist, which can lead to inadequate management and influence the prognosis of these patients.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2020-07-17T14:03:15Z
2020-07-17T14:03:15Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0395-x
Bmc Ophthalmology. London, v. 17, p. -, 2017.
10.1186/s12886-016-0395-x
WOS000391512600002.pdf
1471-2415
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55263
WOS:000391512600002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0395-x
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55263
identifier_str_mv Bmc Ophthalmology. London, v. 17, p. -, 2017.
10.1186/s12886-016-0395-x
WOS000391512600002.pdf
1471-2415
WOS:000391512600002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Bmc Ophthalmology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv -
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv London
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268376736858112