Existential constructions and the problem of linguistic evaluation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vitório, Elyne Giselle de Santana Lima Aguiar
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Domínios de Lingu@gem
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/40617
Resumo: Considering that the study of a speech community should not be exhausted in the description and characterization of its linguistic traits, it should also seek to make explicit its evaluative attitudes, because the prestige or stigma that a community associates with a given variant can accelerate or prevent a change in the language, we measured the subjective norms of the maceioense speakers in relation to the variation of “ter” and “haver” in existential constructions and the verbal agreement associated with these verbal forms. To do so, we use the Theory of Language Variation and Change (WEINREICH; LABOV; HERZOG, 1968; LABOV, 1972) and we used a subjective reaction test composed of 20 questions, which was applied to 60 maceioenses informants. Our data suggest not only that “ter” is the preferred existential verb, but, in the formal situation and in the imperfect, perfect and future of the present times, there is an increase in the choice of “haver”, which seems to indicate that we are before linguistic marker, that to “haver” and “ter” in the third person plural – 3PP are the preferred variants, being more frequent in the formal situation and at imperfect and perfect times, suggesting that there is no stigma in the use of these variants.
id UFU-12_b0bea0c2bc10bf62c6ad7b36d57bb4f8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/40617
network_acronym_str UFU-12
network_name_str Domínios de Lingu@gem
repository_id_str
spelling Existential constructions and the problem of linguistic evaluationAs construções existenciais e o problema da avaliação linguísticaTer existencialHaver existencialConcordância verbalAvaliação linguística“Ter” existential“Haver” existentialVerbal agreementLinguistic evaluationConsidering that the study of a speech community should not be exhausted in the description and characterization of its linguistic traits, it should also seek to make explicit its evaluative attitudes, because the prestige or stigma that a community associates with a given variant can accelerate or prevent a change in the language, we measured the subjective norms of the maceioense speakers in relation to the variation of “ter” and “haver” in existential constructions and the verbal agreement associated with these verbal forms. To do so, we use the Theory of Language Variation and Change (WEINREICH; LABOV; HERZOG, 1968; LABOV, 1972) and we used a subjective reaction test composed of 20 questions, which was applied to 60 maceioenses informants. Our data suggest not only that “ter” is the preferred existential verb, but, in the formal situation and in the imperfect, perfect and future of the present times, there is an increase in the choice of “haver”, which seems to indicate that we are before linguistic marker, that to “haver” and “ter” in the third person plural – 3PP are the preferred variants, being more frequent in the formal situation and at imperfect and perfect times, suggesting that there is no stigma in the use of these variants.Tendo em vista que o estudo de uma comunidade de fala não deve se esgotar na descrição e caracterização de seus traços linguísticos, mas também deve buscar explicitar suas atitudes avaliativas, pois o prestígio ou o estigma que uma comunidade associa a determinada variante pode acelerar ou barrar uma mudança na língua, mensuramos as normas subjetivas dos falantes maceioenses em relação à variação ter e haver em construções existenciais e à concordância verbal associada a essas formas verbais. Para tanto, recorremos à Teoria da Variação e Mudança Linguística (WEINREICH; LABOV; HERZOG, 1968; LABOV, 1972) e utilizamos um teste de reação subjetiva composto por 20 questões, que foi aplicado a 60 informantes maceioenses. Nossos dados apontam não só que ter é o verbo existencial preferido, mas na situação formal e nos tempos pretérito imperfeito e perfeito e futuro do presente, há um aumento na escolha de haver, o que parece indicar que estamos diante de um marcador linguístico, como também que haver e ter na terceira pessoa do plural – 3PP são as variantes preferidas, sendo mais frequentes na situação formal e nos tempos pretérito imperfeito e perfeito, sugerindo que não há estigma no uso dessas variantes.PP/UFU2018-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/4061710.14393/DL35-v12n3a2018-16Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2018): Número Atemático; 1825-1858Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2018): Número Atemático; 1825-1858Domínios de Lingu@gem; v. 12 n. 3 (2018): Número Atemático; 1825-18581980-5799reponame:Domínios de Lingu@geminstname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/40617/24001Copyright (c) 2018 Elyne Giselle de Santana Lima Aguiar Vitórioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVitório, Elyne Giselle de Santana Lima Aguiar2019-05-09T13:34:37Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/40617Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagemPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/oairevistadominios@ileel.ufu.br||1980-57991980-5799opendoar:2019-05-09T13:34:37Domínios de Lingu@gem - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Existential constructions and the problem of linguistic evaluation
As construções existenciais e o problema da avaliação linguística
title Existential constructions and the problem of linguistic evaluation
spellingShingle Existential constructions and the problem of linguistic evaluation
Vitório, Elyne Giselle de Santana Lima Aguiar
Ter existencial
Haver existencial
Concordância verbal
Avaliação linguística
“Ter” existential
“Haver” existential
Verbal agreement
Linguistic evaluation
title_short Existential constructions and the problem of linguistic evaluation
title_full Existential constructions and the problem of linguistic evaluation
title_fullStr Existential constructions and the problem of linguistic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Existential constructions and the problem of linguistic evaluation
title_sort Existential constructions and the problem of linguistic evaluation
author Vitório, Elyne Giselle de Santana Lima Aguiar
author_facet Vitório, Elyne Giselle de Santana Lima Aguiar
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vitório, Elyne Giselle de Santana Lima Aguiar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ter existencial
Haver existencial
Concordância verbal
Avaliação linguística
“Ter” existential
“Haver” existential
Verbal agreement
Linguistic evaluation
topic Ter existencial
Haver existencial
Concordância verbal
Avaliação linguística
“Ter” existential
“Haver” existential
Verbal agreement
Linguistic evaluation
description Considering that the study of a speech community should not be exhausted in the description and characterization of its linguistic traits, it should also seek to make explicit its evaluative attitudes, because the prestige or stigma that a community associates with a given variant can accelerate or prevent a change in the language, we measured the subjective norms of the maceioense speakers in relation to the variation of “ter” and “haver” in existential constructions and the verbal agreement associated with these verbal forms. To do so, we use the Theory of Language Variation and Change (WEINREICH; LABOV; HERZOG, 1968; LABOV, 1972) and we used a subjective reaction test composed of 20 questions, which was applied to 60 maceioenses informants. Our data suggest not only that “ter” is the preferred existential verb, but, in the formal situation and in the imperfect, perfect and future of the present times, there is an increase in the choice of “haver”, which seems to indicate that we are before linguistic marker, that to “haver” and “ter” in the third person plural – 3PP are the preferred variants, being more frequent in the formal situation and at imperfect and perfect times, suggesting that there is no stigma in the use of these variants.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/40617
10.14393/DL35-v12n3a2018-16
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/40617
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/DL35-v12n3a2018-16
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/40617/24001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Elyne Giselle de Santana Lima Aguiar Vitório
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Elyne Giselle de Santana Lima Aguiar Vitório
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PP/UFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PP/UFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2018): Número Atemático; 1825-1858
Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2018): Número Atemático; 1825-1858
Domínios de Lingu@gem; v. 12 n. 3 (2018): Número Atemático; 1825-1858
1980-5799
reponame:Domínios de Lingu@gem
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Domínios de Lingu@gem
collection Domínios de Lingu@gem
repository.name.fl_str_mv Domínios de Lingu@gem - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadominios@ileel.ufu.br||
_version_ 1797067716534730752