Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Marcus Vinicius Morais de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Demeu, Andréia Alves, Bonatti, Franscine Kelli Quinhones, Torres, Francisco Eduardo, Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32880
Resumo: The aims of this study were to evaluate forage production and nutritional quality of the elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea beans, grown in monocrop or in intercropping systems in Cerrado / Pantanal ecotones in both, dry and rainy, seasons. Experimental design was completely randomized with five treatments and five repetitions. The treatments were: elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea all of these in monocrop; intercropping elephant grass with Leucaena; intercropping elephant grass with pigeon pea. During the rainy season, it was carried out three cuts at intervals of 60 days, and in the dry season a single cut with 180 days. In the rainy season, the biomass produced of the forages elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea corresponded respectively to 72, 64, 76% of the annual production. Under intercropping system, fodder behaves similarly, with the average of 72% of annual production. During this period, the nutritional quality of the forages was also higher than the dry season. In the dry period, there was decreased the production of biomass and a reduction in the proportion of leaves in all the forage, regardless of cultivation system. In both seasons (rainy and dry), the forage grown under intercropping system showed higher dry matter production in relation to monocrop system, with most of this production coming of elephant grass. The intercropping elephant grass with the pigeon pea has the highest production of dry matter, while the intercropping elephant grass with Leucaena has better nutritional quality.
id UFU-14_64c16aab9c316f8b39d8c274187e863c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/32880
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone Produção e qualidade da forragem de consórcios no ecótono Cerrado/Pantanal Cajanus cajanPennistum purpureumLeucaena leucoceohalaCajanus cajanLeucaena leucoceohalaPennisetum purpureumThe aims of this study were to evaluate forage production and nutritional quality of the elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea beans, grown in monocrop or in intercropping systems in Cerrado / Pantanal ecotones in both, dry and rainy, seasons. Experimental design was completely randomized with five treatments and five repetitions. The treatments were: elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea all of these in monocrop; intercropping elephant grass with Leucaena; intercropping elephant grass with pigeon pea. During the rainy season, it was carried out three cuts at intervals of 60 days, and in the dry season a single cut with 180 days. In the rainy season, the biomass produced of the forages elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea corresponded respectively to 72, 64, 76% of the annual production. Under intercropping system, fodder behaves similarly, with the average of 72% of annual production. During this period, the nutritional quality of the forages was also higher than the dry season. In the dry period, there was decreased the production of biomass and a reduction in the proportion of leaves in all the forage, regardless of cultivation system. In both seasons (rainy and dry), the forage grown under intercropping system showed higher dry matter production in relation to monocrop system, with most of this production coming of elephant grass. The intercropping elephant grass with the pigeon pea has the highest production of dry matter, while the intercropping elephant grass with Leucaena has better nutritional quality.Os objetivos deste trabalho foram avaliar a produção de forragem e a qualidade nutricional do capimelefante, Leucaena e feijão guandu, cultivados de forma solteira ou em sistema de consórcio no ecótono Cerrado/Pantanal, em duas estações do ano (das águas e seca). O delineamento utilizado foi o inteiramente casualizado com cinco tratamentos e cinco repetições. Os tratamentos foram: capim elefante solteiro; Leucaena solteira; feijão gandu solteiro; consórcio capim elefante com Leucaena; consórcio capim elefante com feijão guandu. Na época das chuvas foram realizados três cortes em intervalos de 60 dias e na época da seca um único corte, com 180 dias. Na estação das chuvas, a biomassa produzida das forrageiras capim elefante, Leucaena e feijão guandu corresponderam, respectivamente, a 72, 64, 76% de toda a produção anual. No sistema de consórcio as forrageiras apresentaram um comportamento similar, com média de 72% da produção anual. Neste período a qualidade nutritiva das forrageiras também foi superior a época seca. No período seco, verificou-se menor produção de biomassa e uma redução na  roporção de folhas, em todas as forrageiras, independentemente do sistema de cultivo. Em ambos os períodos (águas e seco), as forrageiras cultivadas em sistema de consórcio, apresentaram produção de matéria seca superior às cultivadas solteiras, sendo a maior parte desta produção oriunda do capim elefante. O consorcio do capim elefante com o feijão guandu apresenta a maior produção de matéria seca, enquanto o consórcio do capim elefante com a Leucaena possui melhor qualidade nutricional.EDUFU2017-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3288010.14393/BJ-v33n2-32880Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017): Mar./Apr.Bioscience Journal ; v. 33 n. 2 (2017): Mar./Apr.1981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32880/20000Copyright (c) 2017 Marcus Vinicius Morais de Oliveira, Andréia Alves Demeu, Franscine Kelli Quinhones Bonatti, Francisco Eduardo Torres, Paulo Eduardo Teodorohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Marcus Vinicius Morais deDemeu, Andréia AlvesBonatti, Franscine Kelli QuinhonesTorres, Francisco EduardoTeodoro, Paulo Eduardo2022-01-03T16:22:15Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/32880Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-01-03T16:22:15Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone
Produção e qualidade da forragem de consórcios no ecótono Cerrado/Pantanal
title Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone
spellingShingle Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone
Oliveira, Marcus Vinicius Morais de
Cajanus cajan
Pennistum purpureum
Leucaena leucoceohala
Cajanus cajan
Leucaena leucoceohala
Pennisetum purpureum
title_short Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone
title_full Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone
title_fullStr Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone
title_full_unstemmed Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone
title_sort Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone
author Oliveira, Marcus Vinicius Morais de
author_facet Oliveira, Marcus Vinicius Morais de
Demeu, Andréia Alves
Bonatti, Franscine Kelli Quinhones
Torres, Francisco Eduardo
Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Demeu, Andréia Alves
Bonatti, Franscine Kelli Quinhones
Torres, Francisco Eduardo
Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Marcus Vinicius Morais de
Demeu, Andréia Alves
Bonatti, Franscine Kelli Quinhones
Torres, Francisco Eduardo
Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cajanus cajan
Pennistum purpureum
Leucaena leucoceohala
Cajanus cajan
Leucaena leucoceohala
Pennisetum purpureum
topic Cajanus cajan
Pennistum purpureum
Leucaena leucoceohala
Cajanus cajan
Leucaena leucoceohala
Pennisetum purpureum
description The aims of this study were to evaluate forage production and nutritional quality of the elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea beans, grown in monocrop or in intercropping systems in Cerrado / Pantanal ecotones in both, dry and rainy, seasons. Experimental design was completely randomized with five treatments and five repetitions. The treatments were: elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea all of these in monocrop; intercropping elephant grass with Leucaena; intercropping elephant grass with pigeon pea. During the rainy season, it was carried out three cuts at intervals of 60 days, and in the dry season a single cut with 180 days. In the rainy season, the biomass produced of the forages elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea corresponded respectively to 72, 64, 76% of the annual production. Under intercropping system, fodder behaves similarly, with the average of 72% of annual production. During this period, the nutritional quality of the forages was also higher than the dry season. In the dry period, there was decreased the production of biomass and a reduction in the proportion of leaves in all the forage, regardless of cultivation system. In both seasons (rainy and dry), the forage grown under intercropping system showed higher dry matter production in relation to monocrop system, with most of this production coming of elephant grass. The intercropping elephant grass with the pigeon pea has the highest production of dry matter, while the intercropping elephant grass with Leucaena has better nutritional quality.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32880
10.14393/BJ-v33n2-32880
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32880
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v33n2-32880
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32880/20000
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017): Mar./Apr.
Bioscience Journal ; v. 33 n. 2 (2017): Mar./Apr.
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069076379467776