Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32880 |
Resumo: | The aims of this study were to evaluate forage production and nutritional quality of the elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea beans, grown in monocrop or in intercropping systems in Cerrado / Pantanal ecotones in both, dry and rainy, seasons. Experimental design was completely randomized with five treatments and five repetitions. The treatments were: elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea all of these in monocrop; intercropping elephant grass with Leucaena; intercropping elephant grass with pigeon pea. During the rainy season, it was carried out three cuts at intervals of 60 days, and in the dry season a single cut with 180 days. In the rainy season, the biomass produced of the forages elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea corresponded respectively to 72, 64, 76% of the annual production. Under intercropping system, fodder behaves similarly, with the average of 72% of annual production. During this period, the nutritional quality of the forages was also higher than the dry season. In the dry period, there was decreased the production of biomass and a reduction in the proportion of leaves in all the forage, regardless of cultivation system. In both seasons (rainy and dry), the forage grown under intercropping system showed higher dry matter production in relation to monocrop system, with most of this production coming of elephant grass. The intercropping elephant grass with the pigeon pea has the highest production of dry matter, while the intercropping elephant grass with Leucaena has better nutritional quality. |
id |
UFU-14_64c16aab9c316f8b39d8c274187e863c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/32880 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone Produção e qualidade da forragem de consórcios no ecótono Cerrado/Pantanal Cajanus cajanPennistum purpureumLeucaena leucoceohalaCajanus cajanLeucaena leucoceohalaPennisetum purpureumThe aims of this study were to evaluate forage production and nutritional quality of the elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea beans, grown in monocrop or in intercropping systems in Cerrado / Pantanal ecotones in both, dry and rainy, seasons. Experimental design was completely randomized with five treatments and five repetitions. The treatments were: elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea all of these in monocrop; intercropping elephant grass with Leucaena; intercropping elephant grass with pigeon pea. During the rainy season, it was carried out three cuts at intervals of 60 days, and in the dry season a single cut with 180 days. In the rainy season, the biomass produced of the forages elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea corresponded respectively to 72, 64, 76% of the annual production. Under intercropping system, fodder behaves similarly, with the average of 72% of annual production. During this period, the nutritional quality of the forages was also higher than the dry season. In the dry period, there was decreased the production of biomass and a reduction in the proportion of leaves in all the forage, regardless of cultivation system. In both seasons (rainy and dry), the forage grown under intercropping system showed higher dry matter production in relation to monocrop system, with most of this production coming of elephant grass. The intercropping elephant grass with the pigeon pea has the highest production of dry matter, while the intercropping elephant grass with Leucaena has better nutritional quality.Os objetivos deste trabalho foram avaliar a produção de forragem e a qualidade nutricional do capimelefante, Leucaena e feijão guandu, cultivados de forma solteira ou em sistema de consórcio no ecótono Cerrado/Pantanal, em duas estações do ano (das águas e seca). O delineamento utilizado foi o inteiramente casualizado com cinco tratamentos e cinco repetições. Os tratamentos foram: capim elefante solteiro; Leucaena solteira; feijão gandu solteiro; consórcio capim elefante com Leucaena; consórcio capim elefante com feijão guandu. Na época das chuvas foram realizados três cortes em intervalos de 60 dias e na época da seca um único corte, com 180 dias. Na estação das chuvas, a biomassa produzida das forrageiras capim elefante, Leucaena e feijão guandu corresponderam, respectivamente, a 72, 64, 76% de toda a produção anual. No sistema de consórcio as forrageiras apresentaram um comportamento similar, com média de 72% da produção anual. Neste período a qualidade nutritiva das forrageiras também foi superior a época seca. No período seco, verificou-se menor produção de biomassa e uma redução na roporção de folhas, em todas as forrageiras, independentemente do sistema de cultivo. Em ambos os períodos (águas e seco), as forrageiras cultivadas em sistema de consórcio, apresentaram produção de matéria seca superior às cultivadas solteiras, sendo a maior parte desta produção oriunda do capim elefante. O consorcio do capim elefante com o feijão guandu apresenta a maior produção de matéria seca, enquanto o consórcio do capim elefante com a Leucaena possui melhor qualidade nutricional.EDUFU2017-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3288010.14393/BJ-v33n2-32880Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017): Mar./Apr.Bioscience Journal ; v. 33 n. 2 (2017): Mar./Apr.1981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32880/20000Copyright (c) 2017 Marcus Vinicius Morais de Oliveira, Andréia Alves Demeu, Franscine Kelli Quinhones Bonatti, Francisco Eduardo Torres, Paulo Eduardo Teodorohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Marcus Vinicius Morais deDemeu, Andréia AlvesBonatti, Franscine Kelli QuinhonesTorres, Francisco EduardoTeodoro, Paulo Eduardo2022-01-03T16:22:15Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/32880Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-01-03T16:22:15Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone Produção e qualidade da forragem de consórcios no ecótono Cerrado/Pantanal |
title |
Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone |
spellingShingle |
Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone Oliveira, Marcus Vinicius Morais de Cajanus cajan Pennistum purpureum Leucaena leucoceohala Cajanus cajan Leucaena leucoceohala Pennisetum purpureum |
title_short |
Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone |
title_full |
Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone |
title_fullStr |
Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone |
title_full_unstemmed |
Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone |
title_sort |
Production and quality of forage under intercropping systems in the Cerrado/Pantanal ecotone |
author |
Oliveira, Marcus Vinicius Morais de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Marcus Vinicius Morais de Demeu, Andréia Alves Bonatti, Franscine Kelli Quinhones Torres, Francisco Eduardo Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Demeu, Andréia Alves Bonatti, Franscine Kelli Quinhones Torres, Francisco Eduardo Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Marcus Vinicius Morais de Demeu, Andréia Alves Bonatti, Franscine Kelli Quinhones Torres, Francisco Eduardo Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cajanus cajan Pennistum purpureum Leucaena leucoceohala Cajanus cajan Leucaena leucoceohala Pennisetum purpureum |
topic |
Cajanus cajan Pennistum purpureum Leucaena leucoceohala Cajanus cajan Leucaena leucoceohala Pennisetum purpureum |
description |
The aims of this study were to evaluate forage production and nutritional quality of the elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea beans, grown in monocrop or in intercropping systems in Cerrado / Pantanal ecotones in both, dry and rainy, seasons. Experimental design was completely randomized with five treatments and five repetitions. The treatments were: elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea all of these in monocrop; intercropping elephant grass with Leucaena; intercropping elephant grass with pigeon pea. During the rainy season, it was carried out three cuts at intervals of 60 days, and in the dry season a single cut with 180 days. In the rainy season, the biomass produced of the forages elephant grass, leucaena and pigeon pea corresponded respectively to 72, 64, 76% of the annual production. Under intercropping system, fodder behaves similarly, with the average of 72% of annual production. During this period, the nutritional quality of the forages was also higher than the dry season. In the dry period, there was decreased the production of biomass and a reduction in the proportion of leaves in all the forage, regardless of cultivation system. In both seasons (rainy and dry), the forage grown under intercropping system showed higher dry matter production in relation to monocrop system, with most of this production coming of elephant grass. The intercropping elephant grass with the pigeon pea has the highest production of dry matter, while the intercropping elephant grass with Leucaena has better nutritional quality. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-03-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32880 10.14393/BJ-v33n2-32880 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32880 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v33n2-32880 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32880/20000 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017): Mar./Apr. Bioscience Journal ; v. 33 n. 2 (2017): Mar./Apr. 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069076379467776 |