Production, physicochemical quality and antioxidant capacity of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape grafted on different rootstocks
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/48198 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of rootstocks on grape production, quality and antioxidant capacity of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape in two productive cycles. The work was developed in Jundiaí-SP, Brazil (26° 06’ S, 46° 55’ W and an average altitude of 745 m). The experimental design was in randomized blocks with subdivided plots, the plots being represented by the rootstocks and the subplots by the production cycles, with four replications, each consisting of 6 plants. The treatments consisted of a combination of ‘IAC 313 Tropical’, ‘IAC 572 Jales’, ‘IAC 571-6 Jundiaí’, ‘IAC 766 Campinas’ and ‘106-8 Mgt’ as rootstocks and ‘Niagara Rosada’ as graft, and the production cycles were 2013 and 2014. The number of bunches, production and productivity of the vines, the physical characteristics of bunches, berries and stalks and the physicochemical composition of the must (soluble solids content, titratable acidity, pH and the relation soluble solids/titratable acidity) were evaluated in production cycles of 2013 and 2014). The content of chlorophylls, anthocyanins, carotenoids, flavonoids and total phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of grapes were also evaluated in grape berries. The rootstocks did not influence the production and physical quality of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapes. As for the chemical characteristics, rootstocks only had an effect on solids content, and ‘IAC 766’ and ‘106-8 Mgt’ rootstocks promoted higher values of this characteristic. Likewise, the total phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of the grapes were not influenced by the studied rootstocks. The vines in 2013 presented higher production and better physical characteristics of the grapes, however, the soluble solids content in this cycle was lower than in 2014. |
id |
UFU-14_9318686495ed5efd1aafa1d7fb60e85f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/48198 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Production, physicochemical quality and antioxidant capacity of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape grafted on different rootstocksProdução, qualidade físico-química e capacidade antioxidante da uva ‘Niagara Rosada’ sobre diferentes porta-enxertosVitis labrusca.Table grape.Phenolic compounds.Antioxidant activity.AgronomyVitis labrusca.Uva para mesa.Compostos fenólicos.Atividade antioxidante.The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of rootstocks on grape production, quality and antioxidant capacity of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape in two productive cycles. The work was developed in Jundiaí-SP, Brazil (26° 06’ S, 46° 55’ W and an average altitude of 745 m). The experimental design was in randomized blocks with subdivided plots, the plots being represented by the rootstocks and the subplots by the production cycles, with four replications, each consisting of 6 plants. The treatments consisted of a combination of ‘IAC 313 Tropical’, ‘IAC 572 Jales’, ‘IAC 571-6 Jundiaí’, ‘IAC 766 Campinas’ and ‘106-8 Mgt’ as rootstocks and ‘Niagara Rosada’ as graft, and the production cycles were 2013 and 2014. The number of bunches, production and productivity of the vines, the physical characteristics of bunches, berries and stalks and the physicochemical composition of the must (soluble solids content, titratable acidity, pH and the relation soluble solids/titratable acidity) were evaluated in production cycles of 2013 and 2014). The content of chlorophylls, anthocyanins, carotenoids, flavonoids and total phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of grapes were also evaluated in grape berries. The rootstocks did not influence the production and physical quality of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapes. As for the chemical characteristics, rootstocks only had an effect on solids content, and ‘IAC 766’ and ‘106-8 Mgt’ rootstocks promoted higher values of this characteristic. Likewise, the total phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of the grapes were not influenced by the studied rootstocks. The vines in 2013 presented higher production and better physical characteristics of the grapes, however, the soluble solids content in this cycle was lower than in 2014.Objetivou-se avaliar a influência de porta-enxertos na produção da videira, na qualidade e capacidade antioxidante da uva ‘Niagara Rosada’ em dois ciclos produtivos. O trabalho foi realizado em Jundiaí-SP, Brasil (26° 06’ S, 46° 55’ W e uma altitude média de 745m). O delineamento experimental foi de blocos causalizados em parcelas subdivididas, as parcelas foram representas pelos porta-enxertos e as subparcelas pelos ciclos de produção, com quatro repetições, constituídas de 6 plantas. Os tratamentos consistiram na combinação entre os porta-enxertos ‘IAC 313 Tropical’, ‘IAC 572 Jales’, ‘IAC 571-6 Jundiaí’, ‘IAC 766 Campinas’ e ‘106-8 Mgt’ e a variedade copa ‘Niagara Rosada’, e os ciclos produtivos de 2013 e 2014. O número de cachos, produção e produtividade das videiras, as características físicas de cachos, bagas e engaços e a composição físico-química do mosto (teor de sólidos solúveis, acidez titulável, pH e relação sólidos solúveis/acidez titulável) foram avaliados nos ciclos de produção de 2013 e 2014. Avaliou-se ainda nas bagas das uvas o conteúdo de clorofilas, antocianinas, carotenoides, flavonoides e compostos fenólicos totais e a atividade antioxidante. Os porta-enxertos não influenciaram a produção e a qualidade física da uva ‘Niagara Rosada’. Quanto as características químicas houve efeito dos porta-enxertos apenas no teor de sólidos solúveis, sendo que os porta-enxertos ‘IAC 766’ e ‘106-8 Mgt’ promoveram maiores valores dessa característica. Da mesma forma, os compostos fenólicos totais e a atividade antioxidante das uvas não foram influenciados pelos porta-enxertos estudados. As videiras, em 2013 apresentaram maior produção e melhores características físicas das uvas, no entanto, o teor de sólidos solúveis nesse ciclo foi inferior ao de 2014.EDUFU2020-08-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4819810.14393/BJ-v36n6a2020-48198Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 6 (2020): Nov./Dec.; 1879-1889Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 6 (2020): Nov./Dec.; 1879-18891981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/48198/30389Brazil; Contemporary Copyright (c) 2020 Bruna Thaís Ferracioli Vedoato, Francisco José Domingues Neto, Adilson Pimentel Junior, Ana Paula Maia Paiva, Marlon Jocimar Rodrigues da Silva, Mara Fernandes Moura, Giuseppina Pace Pereira Lima, Marco Antonio Tecchiohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVedoato, Bruna Thaís FerracioliDomingues Neto, Francisco José Pimentel Junior, Adilson Paiva, Ana Paula MaiaSilva, Marlon Jocimar Rodrigues daMoura, Mara FernandesLima, Giuseppina Pace PereiraTecchio, Marco Antonio2022-05-26T18:54:56Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/48198Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-05-26T18:54:56Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Production, physicochemical quality and antioxidant capacity of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape grafted on different rootstocks Produção, qualidade físico-química e capacidade antioxidante da uva ‘Niagara Rosada’ sobre diferentes porta-enxertos |
title |
Production, physicochemical quality and antioxidant capacity of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape grafted on different rootstocks |
spellingShingle |
Production, physicochemical quality and antioxidant capacity of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape grafted on different rootstocks Vedoato, Bruna Thaís Ferracioli Vitis labrusca. Table grape. Phenolic compounds. Antioxidant activity. Agronomy Vitis labrusca. Uva para mesa. Compostos fenólicos. Atividade antioxidante. |
title_short |
Production, physicochemical quality and antioxidant capacity of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape grafted on different rootstocks |
title_full |
Production, physicochemical quality and antioxidant capacity of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape grafted on different rootstocks |
title_fullStr |
Production, physicochemical quality and antioxidant capacity of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape grafted on different rootstocks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Production, physicochemical quality and antioxidant capacity of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape grafted on different rootstocks |
title_sort |
Production, physicochemical quality and antioxidant capacity of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape grafted on different rootstocks |
author |
Vedoato, Bruna Thaís Ferracioli |
author_facet |
Vedoato, Bruna Thaís Ferracioli Domingues Neto, Francisco José Pimentel Junior, Adilson Paiva, Ana Paula Maia Silva, Marlon Jocimar Rodrigues da Moura, Mara Fernandes Lima, Giuseppina Pace Pereira Tecchio, Marco Antonio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Domingues Neto, Francisco José Pimentel Junior, Adilson Paiva, Ana Paula Maia Silva, Marlon Jocimar Rodrigues da Moura, Mara Fernandes Lima, Giuseppina Pace Pereira Tecchio, Marco Antonio |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vedoato, Bruna Thaís Ferracioli Domingues Neto, Francisco José Pimentel Junior, Adilson Paiva, Ana Paula Maia Silva, Marlon Jocimar Rodrigues da Moura, Mara Fernandes Lima, Giuseppina Pace Pereira Tecchio, Marco Antonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Vitis labrusca. Table grape. Phenolic compounds. Antioxidant activity. Agronomy Vitis labrusca. Uva para mesa. Compostos fenólicos. Atividade antioxidante. |
topic |
Vitis labrusca. Table grape. Phenolic compounds. Antioxidant activity. Agronomy Vitis labrusca. Uva para mesa. Compostos fenólicos. Atividade antioxidante. |
description |
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of rootstocks on grape production, quality and antioxidant capacity of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape in two productive cycles. The work was developed in Jundiaí-SP, Brazil (26° 06’ S, 46° 55’ W and an average altitude of 745 m). The experimental design was in randomized blocks with subdivided plots, the plots being represented by the rootstocks and the subplots by the production cycles, with four replications, each consisting of 6 plants. The treatments consisted of a combination of ‘IAC 313 Tropical’, ‘IAC 572 Jales’, ‘IAC 571-6 Jundiaí’, ‘IAC 766 Campinas’ and ‘106-8 Mgt’ as rootstocks and ‘Niagara Rosada’ as graft, and the production cycles were 2013 and 2014. The number of bunches, production and productivity of the vines, the physical characteristics of bunches, berries and stalks and the physicochemical composition of the must (soluble solids content, titratable acidity, pH and the relation soluble solids/titratable acidity) were evaluated in production cycles of 2013 and 2014). The content of chlorophylls, anthocyanins, carotenoids, flavonoids and total phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of grapes were also evaluated in grape berries. The rootstocks did not influence the production and physical quality of ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapes. As for the chemical characteristics, rootstocks only had an effect on solids content, and ‘IAC 766’ and ‘106-8 Mgt’ rootstocks promoted higher values of this characteristic. Likewise, the total phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of the grapes were not influenced by the studied rootstocks. The vines in 2013 presented higher production and better physical characteristics of the grapes, however, the soluble solids content in this cycle was lower than in 2014. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/48198 10.14393/BJ-v36n6a2020-48198 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/48198 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v36n6a2020-48198 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/48198/30389 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 6 (2020): Nov./Dec.; 1879-1889 Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 6 (2020): Nov./Dec.; 1879-1889 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069081838354432 |