Repeatability estimates and minimum number of evaluations for selection of elephant-grass genotypes for herbage production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Erina Vitório
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Daher, Rogério Figueiredo, Gravina, Geraldo de Amaral, Viana, Alexandre Pio, Araújo, Maria do Socorro Bezerra de, Oliveira, Maria Lorraine Fonseca, Vivas, Marcelo, Menezes, Bruna Rafaela da Silva, Pereira, Antônio Vander
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42075
Resumo: In forage-plants breeding, the selection of superior genotypes has been undertaken through successive harvests in previously established intervals. However, this process involves many steps, the evaluation of many traits, and a great spending with costs and labor. Thus the estimate of the repeatability is essential in improvement of perennials, it allows predicting genotypic value of the individual, the minimum number of evaluations in the selection of genotypes and minimizes resources and time in the selection of promising individuals. The objective of this study was to estimate the repeatability coefficient for morphological traits in elephant grass and determine the number of evaluations needed for phenotypic selection more efficient. The experimental randomized block design with 53 genotypes and two replications. The repeatability coefficients were estimated for variables plant height, number of tillers, stem diameter and dry matter yield, using the methods of Anova, Principal Components and Structural Analysis. We observed significant differences between genotypes (P <0.01) for all variables. The main components provide larger estimates of repeatability when compared to other methods. Estimates of the repeatability coefficients are of high magnitude average for the variables plant height (0.44) number of tillers (0.44) and stem diameter (0.63) and low magnitude for dry matter production (0.27). The Principal Components method requires five, five, two and eleven measurements for plant height, number of tillers, stem diameter and dry matter yield, respectively, with 80% reliability.  
id UFU-14_bd6f35fdb85e4301b88c375ed7a473d6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42075
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Repeatability estimates and minimum number of evaluations for selection of elephant-grass genotypes for herbage productionEstimativas de repetibilidade e número mínimo de avaliações para seleção de genótipos de capim-elefante para produção de forragemPennisetum purpureum S.Coefficient of determinationMain componentsDry matter yieldPennisetum purpureum S.Coeficiente de determinaçãoProdutividade de matéria secaIn forage-plants breeding, the selection of superior genotypes has been undertaken through successive harvests in previously established intervals. However, this process involves many steps, the evaluation of many traits, and a great spending with costs and labor. Thus the estimate of the repeatability is essential in improvement of perennials, it allows predicting genotypic value of the individual, the minimum number of evaluations in the selection of genotypes and minimizes resources and time in the selection of promising individuals. The objective of this study was to estimate the repeatability coefficient for morphological traits in elephant grass and determine the number of evaluations needed for phenotypic selection more efficient. The experimental randomized block design with 53 genotypes and two replications. The repeatability coefficients were estimated for variables plant height, number of tillers, stem diameter and dry matter yield, using the methods of Anova, Principal Components and Structural Analysis. We observed significant differences between genotypes (P <0.01) for all variables. The main components provide larger estimates of repeatability when compared to other methods. Estimates of the repeatability coefficients are of high magnitude average for the variables plant height (0.44) number of tillers (0.44) and stem diameter (0.63) and low magnitude for dry matter production (0.27). The Principal Components method requires five, five, two and eleven measurements for plant height, number of tillers, stem diameter and dry matter yield, respectively, with 80% reliability.  No melhoramento de plantas forrageiras, a seleção de genótipos superiores tem sido realizada mediante a realização de cortes sucessivos em intervalos previamente estabelecidos. Entretanto este processo envolve muitas etapas, avaliação de muitos caracteres e um grande dispêndio de custos e mão-de-obra. Assim, a estimativa da repetibilidade é essencial no melhoramento de plantas perenes, pois permite predizer o valor genotípico do indivíduo, o número mínimo de avaliações na seleção de genótipos e minimiza recursos e tempo na seleção de indivíduos promissores. O objetivo deste trabalho foi obter estimativas do coeficiente de repetibilidade para caracteres morfoagronômicos em capim-elefante e determinar o número de avaliações necessárias para seleção fenotípica com maior eficiência. Utilizou-se delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados com 53 genótipos e duas repetições. Foram estimados os coeficientes de repetibilidade para as variáveis altura de plantas (ALT), número de perfilhos (NP), diâmetro de colmo (DC) e produtividade de matéria seca (PMS), utilizando-se os métodos da Anova, Componentes principais e Análise estrutural. Observaram-se diferenças significativas entre os genótipos (p<0,01) para todas as variáveis avaliadas. Os componentes principais proporcionam maiores estimativas de repetibilidade em relação aos demais métodos. As estimativas dos coeficientes de repetibilidade são de média a alta magnitude, para as variáveis ALT, NP e DC e de baixa magnitude para PMS. Com base no método dos Componentes Principais são necessárias cinco, cinco, duas e onze medidas para altura da planta, número de perfilhos, diâmetro do caule e rendimento de matéria seca, respectivamente, com 80% de confiabilidade.EDUFU2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4207510.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-42075Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 30-41Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 30-411981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42075/27506Copyright (c) 2020 Erina Vitório Rodrigues, Rogério Figueiredo Daher, Geraldo de Amaral Gravina, Alexandre Pio Viana, Maria do Socorro Bezerra de Araújo, Maria Lorraine Fonseca Oliveira, Marcelo Vivas, Bruna Rafaela da Silva Menezes, Antônio Vander Pereirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues, Erina VitórioDaher, Rogério Figueiredo Gravina, Geraldo de AmaralViana, Alexandre PioAraújo, Maria do Socorro Bezerra deOliveira, Maria Lorraine FonsecaVivas, MarceloMenezes, Bruna Rafaela da SilvaPereira, Antônio Vander2022-01-14T20:25:04Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42075Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-01-14T20:25:04Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Repeatability estimates and minimum number of evaluations for selection of elephant-grass genotypes for herbage production
Estimativas de repetibilidade e número mínimo de avaliações para seleção de genótipos de capim-elefante para produção de forragem
title Repeatability estimates and minimum number of evaluations for selection of elephant-grass genotypes for herbage production
spellingShingle Repeatability estimates and minimum number of evaluations for selection of elephant-grass genotypes for herbage production
Rodrigues, Erina Vitório
Pennisetum purpureum S.
Coefficient of determination
Main components
Dry matter yield
Pennisetum purpureum S.
Coeficiente de determinação
Produtividade de matéria seca
title_short Repeatability estimates and minimum number of evaluations for selection of elephant-grass genotypes for herbage production
title_full Repeatability estimates and minimum number of evaluations for selection of elephant-grass genotypes for herbage production
title_fullStr Repeatability estimates and minimum number of evaluations for selection of elephant-grass genotypes for herbage production
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability estimates and minimum number of evaluations for selection of elephant-grass genotypes for herbage production
title_sort Repeatability estimates and minimum number of evaluations for selection of elephant-grass genotypes for herbage production
author Rodrigues, Erina Vitório
author_facet Rodrigues, Erina Vitório
Daher, Rogério Figueiredo
Gravina, Geraldo de Amaral
Viana, Alexandre Pio
Araújo, Maria do Socorro Bezerra de
Oliveira, Maria Lorraine Fonseca
Vivas, Marcelo
Menezes, Bruna Rafaela da Silva
Pereira, Antônio Vander
author_role author
author2 Daher, Rogério Figueiredo
Gravina, Geraldo de Amaral
Viana, Alexandre Pio
Araújo, Maria do Socorro Bezerra de
Oliveira, Maria Lorraine Fonseca
Vivas, Marcelo
Menezes, Bruna Rafaela da Silva
Pereira, Antônio Vander
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Erina Vitório
Daher, Rogério Figueiredo
Gravina, Geraldo de Amaral
Viana, Alexandre Pio
Araújo, Maria do Socorro Bezerra de
Oliveira, Maria Lorraine Fonseca
Vivas, Marcelo
Menezes, Bruna Rafaela da Silva
Pereira, Antônio Vander
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pennisetum purpureum S.
Coefficient of determination
Main components
Dry matter yield
Pennisetum purpureum S.
Coeficiente de determinação
Produtividade de matéria seca
topic Pennisetum purpureum S.
Coefficient of determination
Main components
Dry matter yield
Pennisetum purpureum S.
Coeficiente de determinação
Produtividade de matéria seca
description In forage-plants breeding, the selection of superior genotypes has been undertaken through successive harvests in previously established intervals. However, this process involves many steps, the evaluation of many traits, and a great spending with costs and labor. Thus the estimate of the repeatability is essential in improvement of perennials, it allows predicting genotypic value of the individual, the minimum number of evaluations in the selection of genotypes and minimizes resources and time in the selection of promising individuals. The objective of this study was to estimate the repeatability coefficient for morphological traits in elephant grass and determine the number of evaluations needed for phenotypic selection more efficient. The experimental randomized block design with 53 genotypes and two replications. The repeatability coefficients were estimated for variables plant height, number of tillers, stem diameter and dry matter yield, using the methods of Anova, Principal Components and Structural Analysis. We observed significant differences between genotypes (P <0.01) for all variables. The main components provide larger estimates of repeatability when compared to other methods. Estimates of the repeatability coefficients are of high magnitude average for the variables plant height (0.44) number of tillers (0.44) and stem diameter (0.63) and low magnitude for dry matter production (0.27). The Principal Components method requires five, five, two and eleven measurements for plant height, number of tillers, stem diameter and dry matter yield, respectively, with 80% reliability.  
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42075
10.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-42075
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42075
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-42075
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42075/27506
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 30-41
Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 30-41
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069079723376640