Extraction of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Capsicum chinense and Capsicum spp in different solvents and extraction time
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42114 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this work was to evaluate the extraction and quantification of total phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of two peppers processed by four different methods (in natura, dried, preserved in vinegar and preserved in oil). The extraction efficiency of total phenolics using seven solvents (distilled water, ethanol, 50% ethanol, methanol, 50% methanol, ketone p.a and 50% ketone) were checked. Total phenolic analyzes were performed using the Folin-Ciocalteu and gallic acid method to obtain the standard curve with 650 nm absorbance reading. The antioxidant activity was determined using a spectrophotometric method using the reagent 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH). No significant differences were observed in the two extraction times 6 and 24 h. For samples preserved in vinegar, no significant differences were observed between the solvents used for the extraction. The Capsicum chinense pepper showed the highest amount of phenolic compounds in all treatments when compared to the chili pepper, except when conserved in oil. For the dry pepper, the lowest total phenolic extraction value was obtained with 99.5% ethanol (p.a.) and acetone p.a ACS 99.5% (p.a.), which differed from the peppers preserved in oil. The analysis of the antioxidant activity of Capsicum chinense and Capsicum spp did not present a significant difference (p>0.05) when compared to the dried or vinegar preserved samples. However, the sample of Capsicum chinense pepper in natura presented higher antioxidant activity than the samples conserved in oil. It can be considered from the experimental results that the peppers in this study, especially in fresh and dried form are good sources of natural antioxidants. |
id |
UFU-14_d65c3c83ab2bb93a1587704319fdd030 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42114 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Extraction of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Capsicum chinense and Capsicum spp in different solvents and extraction timeExtração do conteúdo de fenólicos totais e atividade antioxidante de Capsicum chinense e Capsicum spp em diferentes solventes e tempo de extraçãochemical analysispepperAgricultural Sciences The purpose of this work was to evaluate the extraction and quantification of total phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of two peppers processed by four different methods (in natura, dried, preserved in vinegar and preserved in oil). The extraction efficiency of total phenolics using seven solvents (distilled water, ethanol, 50% ethanol, methanol, 50% methanol, ketone p.a and 50% ketone) were checked. Total phenolic analyzes were performed using the Folin-Ciocalteu and gallic acid method to obtain the standard curve with 650 nm absorbance reading. The antioxidant activity was determined using a spectrophotometric method using the reagent 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH). No significant differences were observed in the two extraction times 6 and 24 h. For samples preserved in vinegar, no significant differences were observed between the solvents used for the extraction. The Capsicum chinense pepper showed the highest amount of phenolic compounds in all treatments when compared to the chili pepper, except when conserved in oil. For the dry pepper, the lowest total phenolic extraction value was obtained with 99.5% ethanol (p.a.) and acetone p.a ACS 99.5% (p.a.), which differed from the peppers preserved in oil. The analysis of the antioxidant activity of Capsicum chinense and Capsicum spp did not present a significant difference (p>0.05) when compared to the dried or vinegar preserved samples. However, the sample of Capsicum chinense pepper in natura presented higher antioxidant activity than the samples conserved in oil. It can be considered from the experimental results that the peppers in this study, especially in fresh and dried form are good sources of natural antioxidants.A proposta deste trabalho foi avaliar a extração e quantificação de compostos fenólicos totais e a atividade antioxidante de duas espécies de pimentas processadas por quatro diferentes métodos (in natura, seca, conserva em vinagre e conserva em óleo). Foi verificado a eficiência de extração de fenólicos totais de sete solventes (água destilada, etanol p.a, etanol 50 %, metanol p.a, metanol 50 %, cetona p.a e cetona 50 %). Foram realizadas análises de fenólicos totais, utilizando o método de Folin Ciocalteu e ácido gálico para obtenção da curva padrão com leitura de absorbância 650 nm. A atividade antioxidante foi determinada por meio de método espectrofotométrico, utilizando o reagente 2,2-difenil-1-picril hidrazil (DPPH). Não foram observadas diferenças significativas nos dois tempos de extração 6 e 24 h. Para as amostras preservadas em vinagre, não foram observadas diferenças significativas entre os solventes utilizados para a extração. A pimenta Capsicum chinense apresentou a maior quantidade de compostos fenólicos em todos os tratamentos quando comparada à pimenta de cheiro, exceto quando conservada em óleo. Para a pimenta seca, o menor valor médio de extração de fenólicos totais foi obtido com etanol a 99,5% (p.a) e acetona p.a-ACS 99,5% (p.a), que diferiu das pimentas conservadas em óleo. A análise da atividade antioxidante das pimentas Capsicum chinense e Capsicum spp não apresentou diferença significativa (p>0,05) quando comparadas às amostras secas ou conservadas com vinagre. No entanto, a amostra de pimenta “Capsicum chinense” in natura apresentou maior atividade antioxidante do que as amostras conservadas em óleo. Pode-se considerar, pelos resultados experimentais, que as pimentas em estudo, principalmente na forma in natura e dessecada são boas fontes de antioxidantes naturais.EDUFU2019-08-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4211410.14393/BJ-v35n4a2019-42114Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 4 (2019): July/Aug.; 1110-1119Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 4 (2019): July/Aug.; 1110-11191981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42114/26655Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2019 Michely da Silva Ribeiro, Claudia Maria Tomás Melo, Eduardo Santos Almeida, Carla Regina Amorim dos Anjos Queirozhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Michely da SilvaMelo, Claudia Maria TomásAlmeida, Eduardo SantosQueiroz, Carla Regina Amorim dos Anjos2022-01-30T23:14:55Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42114Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-01-30T23:14:55Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Extraction of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Capsicum chinense and Capsicum spp in different solvents and extraction time Extração do conteúdo de fenólicos totais e atividade antioxidante de Capsicum chinense e Capsicum spp em diferentes solventes e tempo de extração |
title |
Extraction of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Capsicum chinense and Capsicum spp in different solvents and extraction time |
spellingShingle |
Extraction of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Capsicum chinense and Capsicum spp in different solvents and extraction time Ribeiro, Michely da Silva chemical analysis pepper Agricultural Sciences |
title_short |
Extraction of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Capsicum chinense and Capsicum spp in different solvents and extraction time |
title_full |
Extraction of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Capsicum chinense and Capsicum spp in different solvents and extraction time |
title_fullStr |
Extraction of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Capsicum chinense and Capsicum spp in different solvents and extraction time |
title_full_unstemmed |
Extraction of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Capsicum chinense and Capsicum spp in different solvents and extraction time |
title_sort |
Extraction of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Capsicum chinense and Capsicum spp in different solvents and extraction time |
author |
Ribeiro, Michely da Silva |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Michely da Silva Melo, Claudia Maria Tomás Almeida, Eduardo Santos Queiroz, Carla Regina Amorim dos Anjos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Melo, Claudia Maria Tomás Almeida, Eduardo Santos Queiroz, Carla Regina Amorim dos Anjos |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Michely da Silva Melo, Claudia Maria Tomás Almeida, Eduardo Santos Queiroz, Carla Regina Amorim dos Anjos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
chemical analysis pepper Agricultural Sciences |
topic |
chemical analysis pepper Agricultural Sciences |
description |
The purpose of this work was to evaluate the extraction and quantification of total phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of two peppers processed by four different methods (in natura, dried, preserved in vinegar and preserved in oil). The extraction efficiency of total phenolics using seven solvents (distilled water, ethanol, 50% ethanol, methanol, 50% methanol, ketone p.a and 50% ketone) were checked. Total phenolic analyzes were performed using the Folin-Ciocalteu and gallic acid method to obtain the standard curve with 650 nm absorbance reading. The antioxidant activity was determined using a spectrophotometric method using the reagent 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH). No significant differences were observed in the two extraction times 6 and 24 h. For samples preserved in vinegar, no significant differences were observed between the solvents used for the extraction. The Capsicum chinense pepper showed the highest amount of phenolic compounds in all treatments when compared to the chili pepper, except when conserved in oil. For the dry pepper, the lowest total phenolic extraction value was obtained with 99.5% ethanol (p.a.) and acetone p.a ACS 99.5% (p.a.), which differed from the peppers preserved in oil. The analysis of the antioxidant activity of Capsicum chinense and Capsicum spp did not present a significant difference (p>0.05) when compared to the dried or vinegar preserved samples. However, the sample of Capsicum chinense pepper in natura presented higher antioxidant activity than the samples conserved in oil. It can be considered from the experimental results that the peppers in this study, especially in fresh and dried form are good sources of natural antioxidants. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42114 10.14393/BJ-v35n4a2019-42114 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42114 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v35n4a2019-42114 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42114/26655 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 4 (2019): July/Aug.; 1110-1119 Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 4 (2019): July/Aug.; 1110-1119 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069079750639616 |