Domain by organization in compared law

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Mathias Oliveira Campos
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Brodt, Luís Augusto Sanzo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Direito
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/11301
Resumo: The aim of the article is to compare the treatment of authorship mediated by domain by organization in Brazilian dogmatics and jurisprudence with its international equivalents. Therefore, in a first moment it is described how the theory was received in Brazil by the doctrine and the jurisprudence of the STF and TRF4, punctuating dogmatic contradictions, mistakes, and omissions. In a second step, the Argentine, German, Spanish, Peruvian and Greek practice is described, observing and highlighting the fundamentals used by each court to accept or reject Roxin’s theory. The purpose is to verify how the experience of other countries can help the application of the theory in national jurisprudence.
id UFV-7_a20a2b571027346dfcc23ea655b4ea64
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/11301
network_acronym_str UFV-7
network_name_str Revista de Direito
repository_id_str
spelling Domain by organization in compared lawO domínio por organização no direito comparadoAuthorship and participationTheory of the domain of factMediate authorshipDomain by organizationComparative lawAutoria e participaçãoTeoria do domínio do fatoAutoria mediataDomínio por organizaçãoDireito comparadoThe aim of the article is to compare the treatment of authorship mediated by domain by organization in Brazilian dogmatics and jurisprudence with its international equivalents. Therefore, in a first moment it is described how the theory was received in Brazil by the doctrine and the jurisprudence of the STF and TRF4, punctuating dogmatic contradictions, mistakes, and omissions. In a second step, the Argentine, German, Spanish, Peruvian and Greek practice is described, observing and highlighting the fundamentals used by each court to accept or reject Roxin’s theory. The purpose is to verify how the experience of other countries can help the application of the theory in national jurisprudence.O objetivo do artigo é comparar o tratamento da autoria mediata pelo domínio por organização na dogmática e jurisprudência brasileira com suas equivalentes internacionais. Para tanto, em um primeiro momento, descreve-se como a teoria foi recepcionada no Brasil pela doutrina e pela jurisprudência do STF e TRF4, pontuando as contradições, equívocos e omissões dogmáticas. Já em um segundo momento, descreve-se a prática argentina, alemã, espanhola, peruana e grega, observando e destacando os fundamentos empregados em cada tribunal para acolher ou rechaçar a teoria de Roxin. A finalidade é verificar como a experiência de outros países pode ajudar na aplicação da teoria na jurisprudência nacional.Universidade Federal de Viçosa2021-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1130110.32361/2021130111301Journal of Law; Vol. 13 No. 01 (2021); 01-34Revista de Direito; v. 13 n. 01 (2021); 01-342527-03891806-8790reponame:Revista de Direitoinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVporhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/11301/6458Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Mathias Oliveira CamposBrodt, Luís Augusto Sanzo 2021-03-11T14:12:11Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/11301Revistahttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/oairevistadir@ufv.br2527-03891806-8790opendoar:2021-03-11T14:12:11Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Domain by organization in compared law
O domínio por organização no direito comparado
title Domain by organization in compared law
spellingShingle Domain by organization in compared law
Santos, Mathias Oliveira Campos
Authorship and participation
Theory of the domain of fact
Mediate authorship
Domain by organization
Comparative law
Autoria e participação
Teoria do domínio do fato
Autoria mediata
Domínio por organização
Direito comparado
title_short Domain by organization in compared law
title_full Domain by organization in compared law
title_fullStr Domain by organization in compared law
title_full_unstemmed Domain by organization in compared law
title_sort Domain by organization in compared law
author Santos, Mathias Oliveira Campos
author_facet Santos, Mathias Oliveira Campos
Brodt, Luís Augusto Sanzo
author_role author
author2 Brodt, Luís Augusto Sanzo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Mathias Oliveira Campos
Brodt, Luís Augusto Sanzo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Authorship and participation
Theory of the domain of fact
Mediate authorship
Domain by organization
Comparative law
Autoria e participação
Teoria do domínio do fato
Autoria mediata
Domínio por organização
Direito comparado
topic Authorship and participation
Theory of the domain of fact
Mediate authorship
Domain by organization
Comparative law
Autoria e participação
Teoria do domínio do fato
Autoria mediata
Domínio por organização
Direito comparado
description The aim of the article is to compare the treatment of authorship mediated by domain by organization in Brazilian dogmatics and jurisprudence with its international equivalents. Therefore, in a first moment it is described how the theory was received in Brazil by the doctrine and the jurisprudence of the STF and TRF4, punctuating dogmatic contradictions, mistakes, and omissions. In a second step, the Argentine, German, Spanish, Peruvian and Greek practice is described, observing and highlighting the fundamentals used by each court to accept or reject Roxin’s theory. The purpose is to verify how the experience of other countries can help the application of the theory in national jurisprudence.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/11301
10.32361/2021130111301
url https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/11301
identifier_str_mv 10.32361/2021130111301
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/11301/6458
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Law; Vol. 13 No. 01 (2021); 01-34
Revista de Direito; v. 13 n. 01 (2021); 01-34
2527-0389
1806-8790
reponame:Revista de Direito
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str Revista de Direito
collection Revista de Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadir@ufv.br
_version_ 1798045794115256320

Registros relacionados