Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Espinhaço |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/154 |
Resumo: | This study aims to compare the quality of the NDVI and SAVI indices and their difference maps from images from the CBERS-4, Landsat-8 (lower resolution), and Rapideye-3A (higher resolution) satellites in an area of Cerrado, Minas Gerais, Brazil. First, the two indexes were calculated for the three images, then these maps were reclassified from the pixel range into four classes using the field and MAPBIOMAS project as the criteria. Following the maps of the CBERS-4 indices were compared with the Rapideye-3A correspondent. The same was done with landsat-8 maps. All processes were carried out with images from May 2015 in ArcGIS. CBERS reported results for NDVI similar to Rapideye, but SAVI presented errors. NDVI and SAVI results from Landsat image showed outliers when compared to CBERS and Rapideye data. The CBVI-4 NDVI difference maps indicated an approximation with the Rapideye results demonstrating the quality of the first, despite its lower resolution. The SAVI results were not satisfactory, either by error (CBERS-4) or due to very different values from the reference satellite, probably related to the use of a constant L unable to portray the variety of vegetation. |
id |
UFVJM-1_e9683085a8489ae756c3fdce1e99a2a4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/154 |
network_acronym_str |
UFVJM-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Espinhaço |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado areaComparação de índices de vegetação entre imagens CBERS, Landsat e Rapideye para área do Cerrado Brasileiro NDVI e SAVIMapa de diferençaSensoriamento remotoNDVI and SAVIDifference mapRemote SensingThis study aims to compare the quality of the NDVI and SAVI indices and their difference maps from images from the CBERS-4, Landsat-8 (lower resolution), and Rapideye-3A (higher resolution) satellites in an area of Cerrado, Minas Gerais, Brazil. First, the two indexes were calculated for the three images, then these maps were reclassified from the pixel range into four classes using the field and MAPBIOMAS project as the criteria. Following the maps of the CBERS-4 indices were compared with the Rapideye-3A correspondent. The same was done with landsat-8 maps. All processes were carried out with images from May 2015 in ArcGIS. CBERS reported results for NDVI similar to Rapideye, but SAVI presented errors. NDVI and SAVI results from Landsat image showed outliers when compared to CBERS and Rapideye data. The CBVI-4 NDVI difference maps indicated an approximation with the Rapideye results demonstrating the quality of the first, despite its lower resolution. The SAVI results were not satisfactory, either by error (CBERS-4) or due to very different values from the reference satellite, probably related to the use of a constant L unable to portray the variety of vegetation.Este estudo objetiva comparar a qualidade dos índices NDVI e SAVI e seus mapas de diferença a partir de imagens dos satélites CBERS-4, Landsat-8 (de menores resolução) e Rapideye-3A (maior resolução) em uma área de Cerrado, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Primeiramente foram calculados os dois índices para as três imagens, em seguida estes mapas foram reclassificados a partir do intervalo de pixel em quatro classes utilizando como critério idas a campo e o projeto MAPBIOMAS. Na sequência os mapas dos índices do CBERS-4 foram comparados com o correspondente do Rapideye-3A. O mesmo foi feito com os mapas do Landsat-8. Todos os processos foram realizados com imagens de maio de 2015 no ArcGIS. CBERS apresentou resultado para o NDVI semelhante ao Rapideye, embora o SAVI tenha relatado erro. Resultados NDVI e SAVI a partir de imagens Landsat-8 mostraram valores discrepantes quando comparados aos dados CBERS e Rapideye. Os mapas de diferença NDVI do CBERS-4 indicaram uma aproximação com os resultados do Rapideye demonstrando a qualidade do primeiro mesmo diante de sua resolução mais baixa. Os resultados do SAVI não foram satisfatórios, seja por erro (CBERS-4) ou devido a valores muito diferentes do satélite de referência, provavelmente relacionados ao uso de uma constante L incapaz de retratar a variação da vegetação.UFVJM2020-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/15410.5281/zenodo.3937479Revista Espinhaço ; Revista Espinhaço #162317-0611reponame:Revista Espinhaçoinstname:Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)instacron:UFVJMporhttps://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/154/165Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Espinhaço https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeves, Lomanto ZogaibMucida, Danielle Piuzana2022-07-22T18:48:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/154Revistahttps://revistaespinhaco.com/index.php/revista/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/oairevista.espinhaco@gmail.com || doug.sathler@gmail.com2317-06112317-0611opendoar:2022-07-22T18:48:22Revista Espinhaço - Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area Comparação de índices de vegetação entre imagens CBERS, Landsat e Rapideye para área do Cerrado Brasileiro |
title |
Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area |
spellingShingle |
Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area Neves, Lomanto Zogaib NDVI e SAVI Mapa de diferença Sensoriamento remoto NDVI and SAVI Difference map Remote Sensing |
title_short |
Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area |
title_full |
Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area |
title_fullStr |
Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area |
title_sort |
Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area |
author |
Neves, Lomanto Zogaib |
author_facet |
Neves, Lomanto Zogaib Mucida, Danielle Piuzana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mucida, Danielle Piuzana |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Neves, Lomanto Zogaib Mucida, Danielle Piuzana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
NDVI e SAVI Mapa de diferença Sensoriamento remoto NDVI and SAVI Difference map Remote Sensing |
topic |
NDVI e SAVI Mapa de diferença Sensoriamento remoto NDVI and SAVI Difference map Remote Sensing |
description |
This study aims to compare the quality of the NDVI and SAVI indices and their difference maps from images from the CBERS-4, Landsat-8 (lower resolution), and Rapideye-3A (higher resolution) satellites in an area of Cerrado, Minas Gerais, Brazil. First, the two indexes were calculated for the three images, then these maps were reclassified from the pixel range into four classes using the field and MAPBIOMAS project as the criteria. Following the maps of the CBERS-4 indices were compared with the Rapideye-3A correspondent. The same was done with landsat-8 maps. All processes were carried out with images from May 2015 in ArcGIS. CBERS reported results for NDVI similar to Rapideye, but SAVI presented errors. NDVI and SAVI results from Landsat image showed outliers when compared to CBERS and Rapideye data. The CBVI-4 NDVI difference maps indicated an approximation with the Rapideye results demonstrating the quality of the first, despite its lower resolution. The SAVI results were not satisfactory, either by error (CBERS-4) or due to very different values from the reference satellite, probably related to the use of a constant L unable to portray the variety of vegetation. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/154 10.5281/zenodo.3937479 |
url |
https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/154 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5281/zenodo.3937479 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/154/165 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Espinhaço https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Espinhaço https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFVJM |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFVJM |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Espinhaço ; Revista Espinhaço #16 2317-0611 reponame:Revista Espinhaço instname:Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) instacron:UFVJM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) |
instacron_str |
UFVJM |
institution |
UFVJM |
reponame_str |
Revista Espinhaço |
collection |
Revista Espinhaço |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Espinhaço - Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.espinhaco@gmail.com || doug.sathler@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798325375145607168 |