Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Neves, Lomanto Zogaib
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Mucida, Danielle Piuzana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Espinhaço
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/154
Resumo: This study aims to compare the quality of the NDVI and SAVI indices and their difference maps from images from the CBERS-4, Landsat-8 (lower resolution), and Rapideye-3A (higher resolution) satellites in an area of Cerrado, Minas Gerais, Brazil. First, the two indexes were calculated for the three images, then these maps were reclassified from the pixel range into four classes using the field and MAPBIOMAS project as the criteria. Following the maps of the CBERS-4 indices were compared with the Rapideye-3A correspondent. The same was done with landsat-8 maps. All processes were carried out with images from May 2015 in ArcGIS. CBERS reported results for NDVI similar to Rapideye, but SAVI presented errors. NDVI and SAVI results from Landsat image showed outliers when compared to CBERS and Rapideye data. The CBVI-4 NDVI difference maps indicated an approximation with the Rapideye results demonstrating the quality of the first, despite its lower resolution. The SAVI results were not satisfactory, either by error (CBERS-4) or due to very different values from the reference satellite, probably related to the use of a constant L unable to portray the variety of vegetation.
id UFVJM-1_e9683085a8489ae756c3fdce1e99a2a4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/154
network_acronym_str UFVJM-1
network_name_str Revista Espinhaço
repository_id_str
spelling Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado areaComparação de índices de vegetação entre imagens CBERS, Landsat e Rapideye para área do Cerrado Brasileiro NDVI e SAVIMapa de diferençaSensoriamento remotoNDVI and SAVIDifference mapRemote SensingThis study aims to compare the quality of the NDVI and SAVI indices and their difference maps from images from the CBERS-4, Landsat-8 (lower resolution), and Rapideye-3A (higher resolution) satellites in an area of Cerrado, Minas Gerais, Brazil. First, the two indexes were calculated for the three images, then these maps were reclassified from the pixel range into four classes using the field and MAPBIOMAS project as the criteria. Following the maps of the CBERS-4 indices were compared with the Rapideye-3A correspondent. The same was done with landsat-8 maps. All processes were carried out with images from May 2015 in ArcGIS. CBERS reported results for NDVI similar to Rapideye, but SAVI presented errors. NDVI and SAVI results from Landsat image showed outliers when compared to CBERS and Rapideye data. The CBVI-4 NDVI difference maps indicated an approximation with the Rapideye results demonstrating the quality of the first, despite its lower resolution. The SAVI results were not satisfactory, either by error (CBERS-4) or due to very different values from the reference satellite, probably related to the use of a constant L unable to portray the variety of vegetation.Este estudo objetiva comparar a qualidade dos índices NDVI e SAVI e seus mapas de diferença a partir de imagens dos satélites CBERS-4, Landsat-8 (de menores resolução) e Rapideye-3A (maior resolução) em uma área de Cerrado, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Primeiramente foram calculados os dois índices para as três imagens, em seguida estes mapas foram reclassificados a partir do intervalo de pixel em quatro classes utilizando como critério idas a campo e o projeto MAPBIOMAS. Na sequência os mapas dos índices do CBERS-4 foram comparados com o correspondente do Rapideye-3A. O mesmo foi feito com os mapas do Landsat-8. Todos os processos foram realizados com imagens de maio de 2015 no ArcGIS. CBERS apresentou resultado para o NDVI semelhante ao Rapideye, embora o SAVI tenha relatado erro. Resultados NDVI e SAVI a partir de imagens Landsat-8 mostraram valores discrepantes quando comparados aos dados CBERS e Rapideye. Os mapas de diferença NDVI do CBERS-4 indicaram uma aproximação com os resultados do Rapideye demonstrando a qualidade do primeiro mesmo diante de sua resolução mais baixa. Os resultados do SAVI não foram satisfatórios, seja por erro (CBERS-4) ou devido a valores muito diferentes do satélite de referência, provavelmente relacionados ao uso de uma constante L incapaz de retratar a variação da vegetação.UFVJM2020-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/15410.5281/zenodo.3937479Revista Espinhaço ; Revista Espinhaço #162317-0611reponame:Revista Espinhaçoinstname:Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)instacron:UFVJMporhttps://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/154/165Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Espinhaço https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeves, Lomanto ZogaibMucida, Danielle Piuzana2022-07-22T18:48:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/154Revistahttps://revistaespinhaco.com/index.php/revista/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/oairevista.espinhaco@gmail.com || doug.sathler@gmail.com2317-06112317-0611opendoar:2022-07-22T18:48:22Revista Espinhaço - Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area
Comparação de índices de vegetação entre imagens CBERS, Landsat e Rapideye para área do Cerrado Brasileiro
title Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area
spellingShingle Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area
Neves, Lomanto Zogaib
NDVI e SAVI
Mapa de diferença
Sensoriamento remoto
NDVI and SAVI
Difference map
Remote Sensing
title_short Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area
title_full Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area
title_fullStr Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area
title_full_unstemmed Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area
title_sort Comparing vegetation indexes between CBERS, Landsat and Rapideye images for the Brazilian Cerrado area
author Neves, Lomanto Zogaib
author_facet Neves, Lomanto Zogaib
Mucida, Danielle Piuzana
author_role author
author2 Mucida, Danielle Piuzana
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Neves, Lomanto Zogaib
Mucida, Danielle Piuzana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv NDVI e SAVI
Mapa de diferença
Sensoriamento remoto
NDVI and SAVI
Difference map
Remote Sensing
topic NDVI e SAVI
Mapa de diferença
Sensoriamento remoto
NDVI and SAVI
Difference map
Remote Sensing
description This study aims to compare the quality of the NDVI and SAVI indices and their difference maps from images from the CBERS-4, Landsat-8 (lower resolution), and Rapideye-3A (higher resolution) satellites in an area of Cerrado, Minas Gerais, Brazil. First, the two indexes were calculated for the three images, then these maps were reclassified from the pixel range into four classes using the field and MAPBIOMAS project as the criteria. Following the maps of the CBERS-4 indices were compared with the Rapideye-3A correspondent. The same was done with landsat-8 maps. All processes were carried out with images from May 2015 in ArcGIS. CBERS reported results for NDVI similar to Rapideye, but SAVI presented errors. NDVI and SAVI results from Landsat image showed outliers when compared to CBERS and Rapideye data. The CBVI-4 NDVI difference maps indicated an approximation with the Rapideye results demonstrating the quality of the first, despite its lower resolution. The SAVI results were not satisfactory, either by error (CBERS-4) or due to very different values from the reference satellite, probably related to the use of a constant L unable to portray the variety of vegetation.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/154
10.5281/zenodo.3937479
url https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/154
identifier_str_mv 10.5281/zenodo.3937479
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/154/165
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Espinhaço
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Espinhaço
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFVJM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFVJM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Espinhaço ; Revista Espinhaço #16
2317-0611
reponame:Revista Espinhaço
instname:Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)
instacron:UFVJM
instname_str Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)
instacron_str UFVJM
institution UFVJM
reponame_str Revista Espinhaço
collection Revista Espinhaço
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Espinhaço - Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.espinhaco@gmail.com || doug.sathler@gmail.com
_version_ 1798325375145607168