356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Davies, Nicholas
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Linhas Críticas (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/4143
Resumo: The article has examined reports of decisions taken by the Audit Office of the Brazilian Federal District on accounts of the Federal District Government, to check how it has calculated revenue and expenses on education from the 1990’s to 2010, and found a number of errors and inconsistencies. One was to never register revenues which should be added to the minimum percentage of taxes linked to education, such as the payroll-linked contribution and other federal transfers for educational programmes. The most serious flaw was not to add to the minimum percentage the astronomical federal transfers (R$ 1.6 billion in 2010) specific to Federal District education, the so-called Federal District Constitutional Fund, at least until the end of 2008, when such transfers began being added to the minimum percentage. Regarding expenses, the main mistake was to consider payment of retired educational personnel as education expenses at least until the end of 2008, when they were excluded from the calculation of the 25% of taxes linked to education. Another error was not clarifying if the expenses considered in the calculation of the minimum percentage were pending, liquidated or paid.
id UNB - 28_87ac24b931ff8b0d34986bd15ebd584e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4143
network_acronym_str UNB - 28
network_name_str Linhas Críticas (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling 356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of AccountsLa Educación perdió miles de millones con el error del Tribunal de CuentasEducação do Distrito Federal perdeu bilhões com erros do Tribunal de ContasFinanciamento da educaçãoTribunal de Contas do Distrito FederalOrçamento da educaçãoFinanciamiento de la educaciónTribunal de Cuentas del DistritoFederalPresupuesto de la educaciónEducation fundingAudit Office of the Brazilian Federal DistrictEducation budgetThe article has examined reports of decisions taken by the Audit Office of the Brazilian Federal District on accounts of the Federal District Government, to check how it has calculated revenue and expenses on education from the 1990’s to 2010, and found a number of errors and inconsistencies. One was to never register revenues which should be added to the minimum percentage of taxes linked to education, such as the payroll-linked contribution and other federal transfers for educational programmes. The most serious flaw was not to add to the minimum percentage the astronomical federal transfers (R$ 1.6 billion in 2010) specific to Federal District education, the so-called Federal District Constitutional Fund, at least until the end of 2008, when such transfers began being added to the minimum percentage. Regarding expenses, the main mistake was to consider payment of retired educational personnel as education expenses at least until the end of 2008, when they were excluded from the calculation of the 25% of taxes linked to education. Another error was not clarifying if the expenses considered in the calculation of the minimum percentage were pending, liquidated or paid.El artículo analizó informes y decisiones normativas del Tribunal de Cuentas de Distrito Federal sobre las cuentas del gobierno de DF para averiguar cómo ha contabilizado ingresos y gastos en educación entre 1990 y 2010 y ha constatado una serie de errores e inconsistencias. Una fue nunca registrar los ingresos adicionales al porcentaje mínimo de impuestos, como las transferencias federales para programas educacionales. La falla más grave fue no contabilizar como incremento las astronómicas transferencias federales específicas para la educación del Distrito Federal, al menos hasta el final de 2008, cuando tales transferencias pasaron a ser aumentadas al mínimo. Con relación al gasto, el principal error fue considerar el pago de jubilados como gastos en educación hasta el final de 2008, cuando ellos fueron excluidos del cálculo del 25% de impuestos vinculados a la educación, una determinación de la Constitución Federal. Otro equívoco fue no clarificar los criterios adoptados en la clasificación de los gastos considerados en el cálculo del mínimo.O artigo analisou relatórios e decisões normativas do TC do Distrito Federal sobre contas do Governo do DF para averiguar como contabilizou receitas e despesas em educação desde os anos 1990 até 2010 e constatou uma série de falhas e inconsistências. Uma foi nunca registrar as receitas adicionais ao percentual mínimo, como o salário-educação e demais transferências federais para programas educacionais. A falha mais grave foi não contabilizar como acréscimo as astronômicas transferências federais (R$ 1,6 bilhão em 2010) específicas para a educação do Distrito Federal, denominadas de Fundo Constitucional do DF pelo menos até o final de 2008, quando tais transferências passaram a ser acrescidas ao mínimo. Pelo lado da despesa, o principal equívoco foi computar o pagamento de inativos como despesas da educação pelo menos até o final de 2008, quando eles foram excluídos do cálculo dos 25% vinculados à educação. Outro equívoco foi não esclarecer se as despesas consideradas no cálculo do mínimo são empenhadas, liquidadas ou pagas.Faculdade de Educação - Universidade de Brasília2013-09-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/414310.26512/lc.v19i39.4143Linhas Críticas; Vol. 19 No. 39 (2013); 355-372Linhas Críticas; Vol. 19 Núm. 39 (2013); 355-372Linhas Crí­ticas; v. 19 n. 39 (2013); 355-3721981-04311516-489610.26512/lc.v19i39reponame:Linhas Críticas (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UnBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/4143/3795Copyright (c) 2016 Linhas Críticashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDavies, Nicholas2022-01-14T17:13:54Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4143Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/PUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/oairvlinhas@unb.br||1981-04311516-4896opendoar:2022-01-14T17:13:54Linhas Críticas (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv 356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts
La Educación perdió miles de millones con el error del Tribunal de Cuentas
Educação do Distrito Federal perdeu bilhões com erros do Tribunal de Contas
title 356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts
spellingShingle 356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts
Davies, Nicholas
Financiamento da educação
Tribunal de Contas do Distrito Federal
Orçamento da educação
Financiamiento de la educación
Tribunal de Cuentas del DistritoFederal
Presupuesto de la educación
Education funding
Audit Office of the Brazilian Federal District
Education budget
title_short 356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts
title_full 356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts
title_fullStr 356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts
title_full_unstemmed 356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts
title_sort 356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts
author Davies, Nicholas
author_facet Davies, Nicholas
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Davies, Nicholas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Financiamento da educação
Tribunal de Contas do Distrito Federal
Orçamento da educação
Financiamiento de la educación
Tribunal de Cuentas del DistritoFederal
Presupuesto de la educación
Education funding
Audit Office of the Brazilian Federal District
Education budget
topic Financiamento da educação
Tribunal de Contas do Distrito Federal
Orçamento da educação
Financiamiento de la educación
Tribunal de Cuentas del DistritoFederal
Presupuesto de la educación
Education funding
Audit Office of the Brazilian Federal District
Education budget
description The article has examined reports of decisions taken by the Audit Office of the Brazilian Federal District on accounts of the Federal District Government, to check how it has calculated revenue and expenses on education from the 1990’s to 2010, and found a number of errors and inconsistencies. One was to never register revenues which should be added to the minimum percentage of taxes linked to education, such as the payroll-linked contribution and other federal transfers for educational programmes. The most serious flaw was not to add to the minimum percentage the astronomical federal transfers (R$ 1.6 billion in 2010) specific to Federal District education, the so-called Federal District Constitutional Fund, at least until the end of 2008, when such transfers began being added to the minimum percentage. Regarding expenses, the main mistake was to consider payment of retired educational personnel as education expenses at least until the end of 2008, when they were excluded from the calculation of the 25% of taxes linked to education. Another error was not clarifying if the expenses considered in the calculation of the minimum percentage were pending, liquidated or paid.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-09-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/4143
10.26512/lc.v19i39.4143
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/4143
identifier_str_mv 10.26512/lc.v19i39.4143
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/4143/3795
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Linhas Críticas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Linhas Críticas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Educação - Universidade de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Educação - Universidade de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Linhas Críticas; Vol. 19 No. 39 (2013); 355-372
Linhas Críticas; Vol. 19 Núm. 39 (2013); 355-372
Linhas Crí­ticas; v. 19 n. 39 (2013); 355-372
1981-0431
1516-4896
10.26512/lc.v19i39
reponame:Linhas Críticas (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UnB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UnB
institution UnB
reponame_str Linhas Críticas (Online)
collection Linhas Críticas (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Linhas Críticas (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rvlinhas@unb.br||
_version_ 1797053651542343680