356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Linhas Críticas (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/4143 |
Resumo: | The article has examined reports of decisions taken by the Audit Office of the Brazilian Federal District on accounts of the Federal District Government, to check how it has calculated revenue and expenses on education from the 1990’s to 2010, and found a number of errors and inconsistencies. One was to never register revenues which should be added to the minimum percentage of taxes linked to education, such as the payroll-linked contribution and other federal transfers for educational programmes. The most serious flaw was not to add to the minimum percentage the astronomical federal transfers (R$ 1.6 billion in 2010) specific to Federal District education, the so-called Federal District Constitutional Fund, at least until the end of 2008, when such transfers began being added to the minimum percentage. Regarding expenses, the main mistake was to consider payment of retired educational personnel as education expenses at least until the end of 2008, when they were excluded from the calculation of the 25% of taxes linked to education. Another error was not clarifying if the expenses considered in the calculation of the minimum percentage were pending, liquidated or paid. |
id |
UNB-32_87ac24b931ff8b0d34986bd15ebd584e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4143 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-32 |
network_name_str |
Linhas Críticas (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of AccountsLa Educación perdió miles de millones con el error del Tribunal de CuentasEducação do Distrito Federal perdeu bilhões com erros do Tribunal de ContasFinanciamento da educaçãoTribunal de Contas do Distrito FederalOrçamento da educaçãoFinanciamiento de la educaciónTribunal de Cuentas del DistritoFederalPresupuesto de la educaciónEducation fundingAudit Office of the Brazilian Federal DistrictEducation budgetThe article has examined reports of decisions taken by the Audit Office of the Brazilian Federal District on accounts of the Federal District Government, to check how it has calculated revenue and expenses on education from the 1990’s to 2010, and found a number of errors and inconsistencies. One was to never register revenues which should be added to the minimum percentage of taxes linked to education, such as the payroll-linked contribution and other federal transfers for educational programmes. The most serious flaw was not to add to the minimum percentage the astronomical federal transfers (R$ 1.6 billion in 2010) specific to Federal District education, the so-called Federal District Constitutional Fund, at least until the end of 2008, when such transfers began being added to the minimum percentage. Regarding expenses, the main mistake was to consider payment of retired educational personnel as education expenses at least until the end of 2008, when they were excluded from the calculation of the 25% of taxes linked to education. Another error was not clarifying if the expenses considered in the calculation of the minimum percentage were pending, liquidated or paid.El artículo analizó informes y decisiones normativas del Tribunal de Cuentas de Distrito Federal sobre las cuentas del gobierno de DF para averiguar cómo ha contabilizado ingresos y gastos en educación entre 1990 y 2010 y ha constatado una serie de errores e inconsistencias. Una fue nunca registrar los ingresos adicionales al porcentaje mínimo de impuestos, como las transferencias federales para programas educacionales. La falla más grave fue no contabilizar como incremento las astronómicas transferencias federales específicas para la educación del Distrito Federal, al menos hasta el final de 2008, cuando tales transferencias pasaron a ser aumentadas al mínimo. Con relación al gasto, el principal error fue considerar el pago de jubilados como gastos en educación hasta el final de 2008, cuando ellos fueron excluidos del cálculo del 25% de impuestos vinculados a la educación, una determinación de la Constitución Federal. Otro equívoco fue no clarificar los criterios adoptados en la clasificación de los gastos considerados en el cálculo del mínimo.O artigo analisou relatórios e decisões normativas do TC do Distrito Federal sobre contas do Governo do DF para averiguar como contabilizou receitas e despesas em educação desde os anos 1990 até 2010 e constatou uma série de falhas e inconsistências. Uma foi nunca registrar as receitas adicionais ao percentual mínimo, como o salário-educação e demais transferências federais para programas educacionais. A falha mais grave foi não contabilizar como acréscimo as astronômicas transferências federais (R$ 1,6 bilhão em 2010) específicas para a educação do Distrito Federal, denominadas de Fundo Constitucional do DF pelo menos até o final de 2008, quando tais transferências passaram a ser acrescidas ao mínimo. Pelo lado da despesa, o principal equívoco foi computar o pagamento de inativos como despesas da educação pelo menos até o final de 2008, quando eles foram excluídos do cálculo dos 25% vinculados à educação. Outro equívoco foi não esclarecer se as despesas consideradas no cálculo do mínimo são empenhadas, liquidadas ou pagas.Faculdade de Educação - Universidade de Brasília2013-09-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/414310.26512/lc.v19i39.4143Linhas Críticas; Vol. 19 No. 39 (2013); 355-372Linhas Críticas; Vol. 19 Núm. 39 (2013); 355-372Linhas Críticas; v. 19 n. 39 (2013); 355-3721981-04311516-489610.26512/lc.v19i39reponame:Linhas Críticas (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UnBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/4143/3795Copyright (c) 2016 Linhas Críticashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDavies, Nicholas2022-01-14T17:13:54Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4143Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/PUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/oairvlinhas@unb.br1981-04311516-4896opendoar:2022-01-14T17:13:54Linhas Críticas (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts La Educación perdió miles de millones con el error del Tribunal de Cuentas Educação do Distrito Federal perdeu bilhões com erros do Tribunal de Contas |
title |
356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts |
spellingShingle |
356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts Davies, Nicholas Financiamento da educação Tribunal de Contas do Distrito Federal Orçamento da educação Financiamiento de la educación Tribunal de Cuentas del DistritoFederal Presupuesto de la educación Education funding Audit Office of the Brazilian Federal District Education budget |
title_short |
356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts |
title_full |
356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts |
title_fullStr |
356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts |
title_full_unstemmed |
356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts |
title_sort |
356Education in the Federal District has lost billions due to errors made by the Court of Accounts |
author |
Davies, Nicholas |
author_facet |
Davies, Nicholas |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Davies, Nicholas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Financiamento da educação Tribunal de Contas do Distrito Federal Orçamento da educação Financiamiento de la educación Tribunal de Cuentas del DistritoFederal Presupuesto de la educación Education funding Audit Office of the Brazilian Federal District Education budget |
topic |
Financiamento da educação Tribunal de Contas do Distrito Federal Orçamento da educação Financiamiento de la educación Tribunal de Cuentas del DistritoFederal Presupuesto de la educación Education funding Audit Office of the Brazilian Federal District Education budget |
description |
The article has examined reports of decisions taken by the Audit Office of the Brazilian Federal District on accounts of the Federal District Government, to check how it has calculated revenue and expenses on education from the 1990’s to 2010, and found a number of errors and inconsistencies. One was to never register revenues which should be added to the minimum percentage of taxes linked to education, such as the payroll-linked contribution and other federal transfers for educational programmes. The most serious flaw was not to add to the minimum percentage the astronomical federal transfers (R$ 1.6 billion in 2010) specific to Federal District education, the so-called Federal District Constitutional Fund, at least until the end of 2008, when such transfers began being added to the minimum percentage. Regarding expenses, the main mistake was to consider payment of retired educational personnel as education expenses at least until the end of 2008, when they were excluded from the calculation of the 25% of taxes linked to education. Another error was not clarifying if the expenses considered in the calculation of the minimum percentage were pending, liquidated or paid. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-09-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/4143 10.26512/lc.v19i39.4143 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/4143 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26512/lc.v19i39.4143 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/4143/3795 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Linhas Críticas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Linhas Críticas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Educação - Universidade de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Educação - Universidade de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Linhas Críticas; Vol. 19 No. 39 (2013); 355-372 Linhas Críticas; Vol. 19 Núm. 39 (2013); 355-372 Linhas Críticas; v. 19 n. 39 (2013); 355-372 1981-0431 1516-4896 10.26512/lc.v19i39 reponame:Linhas Críticas (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UnB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UnB |
institution |
UnB |
reponame_str |
Linhas Críticas (Online) |
collection |
Linhas Críticas (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Linhas Críticas (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rvlinhas@unb.br |
_version_ |
1805309286232883200 |