Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dereti´c, Irina
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38516
Resumo: In Protagoras’ so called Great Speach, in Plato’s dialogue named after him, the Greek philosopher attributes the sophist a myth about the origin, development and nature of human beings, which has philosophical relevance. It is said that the gods created the mortal beings out of two elements, earth and fire. They assigned two titans, Epimetheus and Prometheus, to provide mortals with their faculties. Do this implies that creation had not been finished by the gods? To what extent do the gods entirely create human beings? Is this mith a creationist one? In this paper, the development of living beings is divided in four stages, and different hermeneutic and explanatory models are proposed to adress the myth and answer the questions raised before.
id UNB-18_16fa3163d9554f48f80777530369b2ee
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38516
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are?El Protágoras de Platón y la pregunta por quiénes somosoriginmythcreationismprogresspietyorigenmitocreacionismoprogresopiedad In Protagoras’ so called Great Speach, in Plato’s dialogue named after him, the Greek philosopher attributes the sophist a myth about the origin, development and nature of human beings, which has philosophical relevance. It is said that the gods created the mortal beings out of two elements, earth and fire. They assigned two titans, Epimetheus and Prometheus, to provide mortals with their faculties. Do this implies that creation had not been finished by the gods? To what extent do the gods entirely create human beings? Is this mith a creationist one? In this paper, the development of living beings is divided in four stages, and different hermeneutic and explanatory models are proposed to adress the myth and answer the questions raised before. La figura de Sócrates separa la historia del pensamiento en dos e inaugura un modelo de filosofía que impactó en toda la tradición posterior con la sola fuerza de su influjo y el halo totémico de su muerte trágica. No faltaronrelatos de lo acaecido, pero entre ellos ninguno opaca a la Apología de Sócrates de Platón como texto fundamental para adentrarse en los pormenores del juicio y la condena. En este contexto poco suele tenerse en cuenta que se trata de un texto transido deopacidad. Parece un documento testimonial, una versión cuasi taquigráfica del proceso, pero no lo es. En efecto, nos interesa referirnos especialmente a un hecho que ha sido notado pero no del todo dimensionado: la Apología de Sócrates de Platón presenta similitudes imposibles de atribuir a la mera casualidad con la Apología de Palamedes de Gorgias. ¿Por qué este texto platónico presenta curiosas relaciones intertextuales con un ejercicio retórico basado en figuras míticas en el clima de la promoción de laretórica? Trataremos de responder esa pregunta apelando a su relación con el origen del diálogo socrático.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2021-06-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/3851610.14195/1984-249X_31_07Revista Archai; No. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)Archai Journal; n. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)1984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_31reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBspahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38516/30047Copyright (c) 2021 Irina Dereti´chttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDereti´c, Irina2022-02-04T01:49:15Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38516Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2022-02-04T01:49:15Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are?
El Protágoras de Platón y la pregunta por quiénes somos
title Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are?
spellingShingle Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are?
Dereti´c, Irina
origin
myth
creationism
progress
piety
origen
mito
creacionismo
progreso
piedad
title_short Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are?
title_full Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are?
title_fullStr Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are?
title_full_unstemmed Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are?
title_sort Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are?
author Dereti´c, Irina
author_facet Dereti´c, Irina
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dereti´c, Irina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv origin
myth
creationism
progress
piety
origen
mito
creacionismo
progreso
piedad
topic origin
myth
creationism
progress
piety
origen
mito
creacionismo
progreso
piedad
description In Protagoras’ so called Great Speach, in Plato’s dialogue named after him, the Greek philosopher attributes the sophist a myth about the origin, development and nature of human beings, which has philosophical relevance. It is said that the gods created the mortal beings out of two elements, earth and fire. They assigned two titans, Epimetheus and Prometheus, to provide mortals with their faculties. Do this implies that creation had not been finished by the gods? To what extent do the gods entirely create human beings? Is this mith a creationist one? In this paper, the development of living beings is divided in four stages, and different hermeneutic and explanatory models are proposed to adress the myth and answer the questions raised before.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38516
10.14195/1984-249X_31_07
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38516
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_31_07
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38516/30047
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Irina Dereti´c
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Irina Dereti´c
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)
Archai Journal; n. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)
1984-249X
2179-4960
10.14195/1984-249X_31
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319945667313664

Registros relacionados