Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Revista Archai (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38516 |
Resumo: | In Protagoras’ so called Great Speach, in Plato’s dialogue named after him, the Greek philosopher attributes the sophist a myth about the origin, development and nature of human beings, which has philosophical relevance. It is said that the gods created the mortal beings out of two elements, earth and fire. They assigned two titans, Epimetheus and Prometheus, to provide mortals with their faculties. Do this implies that creation had not been finished by the gods? To what extent do the gods entirely create human beings? Is this mith a creationist one? In this paper, the development of living beings is divided in four stages, and different hermeneutic and explanatory models are proposed to adress the myth and answer the questions raised before. |
id |
UNB-18_16fa3163d9554f48f80777530369b2ee |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38516 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-18 |
network_name_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are?El Protágoras de Platón y la pregunta por quiénes somosoriginmythcreationismprogresspietyorigenmitocreacionismoprogresopiedad In Protagoras’ so called Great Speach, in Plato’s dialogue named after him, the Greek philosopher attributes the sophist a myth about the origin, development and nature of human beings, which has philosophical relevance. It is said that the gods created the mortal beings out of two elements, earth and fire. They assigned two titans, Epimetheus and Prometheus, to provide mortals with their faculties. Do this implies that creation had not been finished by the gods? To what extent do the gods entirely create human beings? Is this mith a creationist one? In this paper, the development of living beings is divided in four stages, and different hermeneutic and explanatory models are proposed to adress the myth and answer the questions raised before. La figura de Sócrates separa la historia del pensamiento en dos e inaugura un modelo de filosofía que impactó en toda la tradición posterior con la sola fuerza de su influjo y el halo totémico de su muerte trágica. No faltaronrelatos de lo acaecido, pero entre ellos ninguno opaca a la Apología de Sócrates de Platón como texto fundamental para adentrarse en los pormenores del juicio y la condena. En este contexto poco suele tenerse en cuenta que se trata de un texto transido deopacidad. Parece un documento testimonial, una versión cuasi taquigráfica del proceso, pero no lo es. En efecto, nos interesa referirnos especialmente a un hecho que ha sido notado pero no del todo dimensionado: la Apología de Sócrates de Platón presenta similitudes imposibles de atribuir a la mera casualidad con la Apología de Palamedes de Gorgias. ¿Por qué este texto platónico presenta curiosas relaciones intertextuales con un ejercicio retórico basado en figuras míticas en el clima de la promoción de laretórica? Trataremos de responder esa pregunta apelando a su relación con el origen del diálogo socrático.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2021-06-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/3851610.14195/1984-249X_31_07Revista Archai; No. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)Archai Journal; n. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)1984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_31reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBspahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38516/30047Copyright (c) 2021 Irina Dereti´chttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDereti´c, Irina2022-02-04T01:49:15Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38516Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2022-02-04T01:49:15Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are? El Protágoras de Platón y la pregunta por quiénes somos |
title |
Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are? |
spellingShingle |
Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are? Dereti´c, Irina origin myth creationism progress piety origen mito creacionismo progreso piedad |
title_short |
Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are? |
title_full |
Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are? |
title_fullStr |
Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are? |
title_sort |
Plato’s Protagoras on Who we Are? |
author |
Dereti´c, Irina |
author_facet |
Dereti´c, Irina |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dereti´c, Irina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
origin myth creationism progress piety origen mito creacionismo progreso piedad |
topic |
origin myth creationism progress piety origen mito creacionismo progreso piedad |
description |
In Protagoras’ so called Great Speach, in Plato’s dialogue named after him, the Greek philosopher attributes the sophist a myth about the origin, development and nature of human beings, which has philosophical relevance. It is said that the gods created the mortal beings out of two elements, earth and fire. They assigned two titans, Epimetheus and Prometheus, to provide mortals with their faculties. Do this implies that creation had not been finished by the gods? To what extent do the gods entirely create human beings? Is this mith a creationist one? In this paper, the development of living beings is divided in four stages, and different hermeneutic and explanatory models are proposed to adress the myth and answer the questions raised before. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38516 10.14195/1984-249X_31_07 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38516 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14195/1984-249X_31_07 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38516/30047 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Irina Dereti´c https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Irina Dereti´c https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai; No. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021) Archai Journal; n. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021) 1984-249X 2179-4960 10.14195/1984-249X_31 reponame:Revista Archai (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
collection |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br |
_version_ |
1798319945667313664 |