The Failure of Philosophical Love: A Reading on Plato’s Symposium

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Franco, Irley F.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: fra
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12792
Resumo: In this paper I argue that Socrates' speech in Plato’s Symposium cannot by itself express Plato’s view of love. All the non-philosophical speeches, each standing for a different contemporary view of love, should be taken into serious consideration, for they are not mere pastiches of empty theories. In fact, they seem to have been placed there to have their intellectual strength tested by philosophy, for not only their contents reveal commonsensical accepted wisdom, but their discursive beauty powerfully impresses the audience, making them true challenges to the cold, though persuasive logos of philosophy. Furthermore, placing Alcibiades' speech right after Diotima’s austere account of love, when the program of speeches as proposed seemed to have arrived at an end, would be unnecessary, if Plato’s aim were simply to disapprove Alcibiades’ behavior to excuse Socrates political attitudes, as it is assumed by Leon Robin in his Notice to his famous translation to the Belles Lettres edition. On the contrary, Alcibiades’ speech sounds more like a criticism of Socratic love made by Plato himself.
id UNB-18_4d8777db46e25d881530c2de48350e23
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12792
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Failure of Philosophical Love: A Reading on Plato’s SymposiumL' échec de l'amour philosophique: Une autre manière de lire Le Banquet de PlatonPlato's SymposiumPlatonic loveErosphilosophical logosBanquetPlatonAmour platoniqueErosLogos philosophiqueIn this paper I argue that Socrates' speech in Plato’s Symposium cannot by itself express Plato’s view of love. All the non-philosophical speeches, each standing for a different contemporary view of love, should be taken into serious consideration, for they are not mere pastiches of empty theories. In fact, they seem to have been placed there to have their intellectual strength tested by philosophy, for not only their contents reveal commonsensical accepted wisdom, but their discursive beauty powerfully impresses the audience, making them true challenges to the cold, though persuasive logos of philosophy. Furthermore, placing Alcibiades' speech right after Diotima’s austere account of love, when the program of speeches as proposed seemed to have arrived at an end, would be unnecessary, if Plato’s aim were simply to disapprove Alcibiades’ behavior to excuse Socrates political attitudes, as it is assumed by Leon Robin in his Notice to his famous translation to the Belles Lettres edition. On the contrary, Alcibiades’ speech sounds more like a criticism of Socratic love made by Plato himself.Mon but est de montrer que le discours de Socrate dans Le Banquet n'exprime pas l'opinion de Platon sur l'amour, contrairement à ce que suppose la grande majorité des scholars. Les discours non philosophiques qui précèdent celui de Socrate sont, eux-aussi, des expressions qui doivent participer à l'évaluation du sens platonicien et ne devraient pas être lus comme de simples pastiches de théories considérées inconsistantes, mais plutôt comme des théories capables de défier véritablement le savoir philosophique. S’il n’en était pas ainsi, il nous faudrait admettre que des discours volontairement fragiles y sont introduits par Platon dans le seul but de montrer la supériorité de la philosophie. L'article propose en outre une nouvelle interprétation de la parole d’Alcibiade, distincte de la traditionnelle. En introduisant Alcibiade peu après la parole apothéotique de la prêtresse Diotima, le but de Platon n’est pas, comme le prétendent Léon Robin et ses disciples, celui de desapprouver Alcibiade et excuser les attitudes politiques de Socrate. Le but de Platon, au contraire, est de montrer l'échec de l'amour philosophique.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2018-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/1279210.14195/1984-249X_24_4Revista Archai; No. 24 (2018): Archai Journal nº24 (September, 2018); 137Archai Journal; n. 24 (2018): Revista Archai nº24 (setembro, 2018); 1371984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_24reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBfrahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12792/11178Franco, Irley F.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-08-19T15:34:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12792Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2019-08-19T15:34:22Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Failure of Philosophical Love: A Reading on Plato’s Symposium
L' échec de l'amour philosophique: Une autre manière de lire Le Banquet de Platon
title The Failure of Philosophical Love: A Reading on Plato’s Symposium
spellingShingle The Failure of Philosophical Love: A Reading on Plato’s Symposium
Franco, Irley F.
Plato's Symposium
Platonic love
Eros
philosophical logos
Banquet
Platon
Amour platonique
Eros
Logos philosophique
title_short The Failure of Philosophical Love: A Reading on Plato’s Symposium
title_full The Failure of Philosophical Love: A Reading on Plato’s Symposium
title_fullStr The Failure of Philosophical Love: A Reading on Plato’s Symposium
title_full_unstemmed The Failure of Philosophical Love: A Reading on Plato’s Symposium
title_sort The Failure of Philosophical Love: A Reading on Plato’s Symposium
author Franco, Irley F.
author_facet Franco, Irley F.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Franco, Irley F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Plato's Symposium
Platonic love
Eros
philosophical logos
Banquet
Platon
Amour platonique
Eros
Logos philosophique
topic Plato's Symposium
Platonic love
Eros
philosophical logos
Banquet
Platon
Amour platonique
Eros
Logos philosophique
description In this paper I argue that Socrates' speech in Plato’s Symposium cannot by itself express Plato’s view of love. All the non-philosophical speeches, each standing for a different contemporary view of love, should be taken into serious consideration, for they are not mere pastiches of empty theories. In fact, they seem to have been placed there to have their intellectual strength tested by philosophy, for not only their contents reveal commonsensical accepted wisdom, but their discursive beauty powerfully impresses the audience, making them true challenges to the cold, though persuasive logos of philosophy. Furthermore, placing Alcibiades' speech right after Diotima’s austere account of love, when the program of speeches as proposed seemed to have arrived at an end, would be unnecessary, if Plato’s aim were simply to disapprove Alcibiades’ behavior to excuse Socrates political attitudes, as it is assumed by Leon Robin in his Notice to his famous translation to the Belles Lettres edition. On the contrary, Alcibiades’ speech sounds more like a criticism of Socratic love made by Plato himself.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articles
Artigos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12792
10.14195/1984-249X_24_4
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12792
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_24_4
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv fra
language fra
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12792/11178
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 24 (2018): Archai Journal nº24 (September, 2018); 137
Archai Journal; n. 24 (2018): Revista Archai nº24 (setembro, 2018); 137
1984-249X
2179-4960
10.14195/1984-249X_24
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319945304506368