The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Revista Archai (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48143 |
Resumo: | Following the proposal of interpreters who deal with the continuity of Plato’s methodology throughout his work, this paper will consider the Sophist dialogue as a convergence point for the Socratic refutation and for the hypothetical method displayed in Republic. Specifically, we will try to identify in this dialogue the highest point of the said method, i.e. the non-hypothetical principle mentioned by Socrates. In addition, this task will lead us to consider, on one hand, the relationship between Plato and his master and, on the other, the place the Sophist and his main interlocutor, the Eleatic Stranger, deserve within the framework of Plato’s philosophical project. |
id |
UNB-18_55b5150939f966fa300e5dd8c6ceed74 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48143 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-18 |
network_name_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the SophistUsos de la refutación y postulación de princípios no hipotéticos en RepúblicaVI-VII y SofistamethodologyrefutationunhypotheticalRepublicSophistmetodologíarefutaciónno-hipotéticoRepúblicaSofistaFollowing the proposal of interpreters who deal with the continuity of Plato’s methodology throughout his work, this paper will consider the Sophist dialogue as a convergence point for the Socratic refutation and for the hypothetical method displayed in Republic. Specifically, we will try to identify in this dialogue the highest point of the said method, i.e. the non-hypothetical principle mentioned by Socrates. In addition, this task will lead us to consider, on one hand, the relationship between Plato and his master and, on the other, the place the Sophist and his main interlocutor, the Eleatic Stranger, deserve within the framework of Plato’s philosophical project.Siguiendo la propuesta de aquellos intérpretes que se ocupan de señalar continuidades en la metodología empleada por Platón a lo largo de su obra, en este trabajo consideraremos al diálogo Sofista como un punto de confluencia de la refutación de cuño socrático y el método hipotético expuesto en República. Específicamente, intentaremos identificar en aquella obra tardía el punto culminante de dicho método, i.e. el principio no hipotético aludido por Sócrates. Asimismo, esa tarea nos conducirá a pensar, por un lado, en la relación entre Platón y su maestro y, por el otro, en el lugar que le cabe al diálogo Sofista y a su interlocutor principal, el Extranjero de Elea, en el proyecto filosófico de Platón.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2022-06-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/4814310.14195/1984-249X_32_13Revista Archai; No. 32 (2022): Archai 32 (2022); e03213Archai Journal; n. 32 (2022): Archai 32 (2022); e032131984-249X2179-4960reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBspahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48143/36755Copyright (c) 2022 Lucas Álvarezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessÁlvarez, Lucas2023-04-18T19:39:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48143Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2023-04-18T19:39:01Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist Usos de la refutación y postulación de princípios no hipotéticos en RepúblicaVI-VII y Sofista |
title |
The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist |
spellingShingle |
The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist Álvarez, Lucas methodology refutation unhypothetical Republic Sophist metodología refutación no-hipotético República Sofista |
title_short |
The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist |
title_full |
The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist |
title_fullStr |
The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist |
title_sort |
The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist |
author |
Álvarez, Lucas |
author_facet |
Álvarez, Lucas |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Álvarez, Lucas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
methodology refutation unhypothetical Republic Sophist metodología refutación no-hipotético República Sofista |
topic |
methodology refutation unhypothetical Republic Sophist metodología refutación no-hipotético República Sofista |
description |
Following the proposal of interpreters who deal with the continuity of Plato’s methodology throughout his work, this paper will consider the Sophist dialogue as a convergence point for the Socratic refutation and for the hypothetical method displayed in Republic. Specifically, we will try to identify in this dialogue the highest point of the said method, i.e. the non-hypothetical principle mentioned by Socrates. In addition, this task will lead us to consider, on one hand, the relationship between Plato and his master and, on the other, the place the Sophist and his main interlocutor, the Eleatic Stranger, deserve within the framework of Plato’s philosophical project. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48143 10.14195/1984-249X_32_13 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48143 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14195/1984-249X_32_13 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48143/36755 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Lucas Álvarez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Lucas Álvarez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai; No. 32 (2022): Archai 32 (2022); e03213 Archai Journal; n. 32 (2022): Archai 32 (2022); e03213 1984-249X 2179-4960 reponame:Revista Archai (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
collection |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br |
_version_ |
1798319942900121600 |