The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Álvarez, Lucas
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48143
Resumo: Following the proposal of interpreters who deal with the continuity of Plato’s methodology throughout his work, this paper will consider the Sophist dialogue as a convergence point for the Socratic refutation and for the hypothetical method displayed in Republic. Specifically, we will try to identify in this dialogue the highest point of the said method, i.e. the non-hypothetical principle mentioned by Socrates. In addition, this task will lead us to consider, on one hand, the relationship between Plato and his master and, on the other, the place the Sophist and his main interlocutor, the Eleatic Stranger, deserve within the framework of Plato’s philosophical project.
id UNB-18_55b5150939f966fa300e5dd8c6ceed74
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48143
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the SophistUsos de la refutación y postulación de princípios no hipotéticos en RepúblicaVI-VII y SofistamethodologyrefutationunhypotheticalRepublicSophistmetodologíarefutaciónno-hipotéticoRepúblicaSofistaFollowing the proposal of interpreters who deal with the continuity of Plato’s methodology throughout his work, this paper will consider the Sophist dialogue as a convergence point for the Socratic refutation and for the hypothetical method displayed in Republic. Specifically, we will try to identify in this dialogue the highest point of the said method, i.e. the non-hypothetical principle mentioned by Socrates. In addition, this task will lead us to consider, on one hand, the relationship between Plato and his master and, on the other, the place the Sophist and his main interlocutor, the Eleatic Stranger, deserve within the framework of Plato’s philosophical project.Siguiendo la propuesta de aquellos intérpretes que se ocupan de señalar continuidades en la metodología empleada por Platón a lo largo de su obra, en este trabajo consideraremos al diálogo Sofista como un punto de confluencia de la refutación de cuño socrático y el método hipotético expuesto en República. Específicamente, intentaremos identificar en aquella obra tardía el punto culminante de dicho método, i.e. el principio no hipotético aludido por Sócrates. Asimismo, esa tarea nos conducirá a pensar, por un lado, en la relación entre Platón y su maestro y, por el otro, en el lugar que le cabe al diálogo Sofista y a su interlocutor principal, el Extranjero de Elea, en el proyecto filosófico de Platón.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2022-06-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/4814310.14195/1984-249X_32_13Revista Archai; No. 32 (2022): Archai 32 (2022); e03213Archai Journal; n. 32 (2022): Archai 32 (2022); e032131984-249X2179-4960reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBspahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48143/36755Copyright (c) 2022 Lucas Álvarezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessÁlvarez, Lucas2023-04-18T19:39:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48143Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2023-04-18T19:39:01Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist
Usos de la refutación y postulación de princípios no hipotéticos en RepúblicaVI-VII y Sofista
title The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist
spellingShingle The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist
Álvarez, Lucas
methodology
refutation
unhypothetical
Republic
Sophist
metodología
refutación
no-hipotético
República
Sofista
title_short The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist
title_full The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist
title_fullStr The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist
title_full_unstemmed The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist
title_sort The Uses of Refutation and the Postulation of Unhypothetical Principles in RepublicVI-VII and the Sophist
author Álvarez, Lucas
author_facet Álvarez, Lucas
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Álvarez, Lucas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv methodology
refutation
unhypothetical
Republic
Sophist
metodología
refutación
no-hipotético
República
Sofista
topic methodology
refutation
unhypothetical
Republic
Sophist
metodología
refutación
no-hipotético
República
Sofista
description Following the proposal of interpreters who deal with the continuity of Plato’s methodology throughout his work, this paper will consider the Sophist dialogue as a convergence point for the Socratic refutation and for the hypothetical method displayed in Republic. Specifically, we will try to identify in this dialogue the highest point of the said method, i.e. the non-hypothetical principle mentioned by Socrates. In addition, this task will lead us to consider, on one hand, the relationship between Plato and his master and, on the other, the place the Sophist and his main interlocutor, the Eleatic Stranger, deserve within the framework of Plato’s philosophical project.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48143
10.14195/1984-249X_32_13
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48143
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_32_13
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48143/36755
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Lucas Álvarez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Lucas Álvarez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 32 (2022): Archai 32 (2022); e03213
Archai Journal; n. 32 (2022): Archai 32 (2022); e03213
1984-249X
2179-4960
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319942900121600

Registros relacionados