Doubt and dogmatism in Cicero’s Academica
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Archai (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26561 |
Resumo: | The objective is to show the peculiar way in which Cicero’s philosophical thinking is original and distances itself from the main representatives of the New Academy: the Roman thinker does not practice epoche, nor does he assign any special role to it in his thought. Instead, Cicero introduces the concept of doubt to characterize his own way of thinking. |
id |
UNB-18_6b7675827f691676cf0250067aa07514 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26561 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-18 |
network_name_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Doubt and dogmatism in Cicero’s AcademicaCiceroepochedoubtskepticismprobabilismThe objective is to show the peculiar way in which Cicero’s philosophical thinking is original and distances itself from the main representatives of the New Academy: the Roman thinker does not practice epoche, nor does he assign any special role to it in his thought. Instead, Cicero introduces the concept of doubt to characterize his own way of thinking.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2019-08-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26561Revista Archai; No. 27 (2019): Archai 27 (2019 [3]); e02705Archai Journal; n. 27 (2019): Archai 27 (2019 [3]); e027051984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_27reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26561/23225Copyright (c) 2019 Alexandre Skvirskyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSkvirsky, Alexandre2019-08-28T18:38:41Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26561Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2019-08-28T18:38:41Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Doubt and dogmatism in Cicero’s Academica |
title |
Doubt and dogmatism in Cicero’s Academica |
spellingShingle |
Doubt and dogmatism in Cicero’s Academica Skvirsky, Alexandre Cicero epoche doubt skepticism probabilism |
title_short |
Doubt and dogmatism in Cicero’s Academica |
title_full |
Doubt and dogmatism in Cicero’s Academica |
title_fullStr |
Doubt and dogmatism in Cicero’s Academica |
title_full_unstemmed |
Doubt and dogmatism in Cicero’s Academica |
title_sort |
Doubt and dogmatism in Cicero’s Academica |
author |
Skvirsky, Alexandre |
author_facet |
Skvirsky, Alexandre |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Skvirsky, Alexandre |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cicero epoche doubt skepticism probabilism |
topic |
Cicero epoche doubt skepticism probabilism |
description |
The objective is to show the peculiar way in which Cicero’s philosophical thinking is original and distances itself from the main representatives of the New Academy: the Roman thinker does not practice epoche, nor does he assign any special role to it in his thought. Instead, Cicero introduces the concept of doubt to characterize his own way of thinking. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articles Artigos |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26561 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26561 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26561/23225 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexandre Skvirsky info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexandre Skvirsky |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai; No. 27 (2019): Archai 27 (2019 [3]); e02705 Archai Journal; n. 27 (2019): Archai 27 (2019 [3]); e02705 1984-249X 2179-4960 10.14195/1984-249X_27 reponame:Revista Archai (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
collection |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br |
_version_ |
1798319945442918400 |