History and Prehistory of Philosophy:: Some Key Dates

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rossetti, Livio
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8604
Resumo: Philosophy is often taken to be something that is always possible, so that everyone is fully entitled (and no one can avoid) sketching a ‘philosophy’ of his/her own. Nevertheless, it is widely assumed that philosophy began in Miletus with Thales. But it is equally well known that the Presocratics remained unaware of being philosophers, and therefore could not even have wanted to be identified that way. These three points are not mutually compatible. So, what lies behind them? What is escaping our attention when we state them? Probably an event in Plato’s life that has too often gone unnoticed: the key role he played in giving form and substance to philosophy, and in getting it to take root once and for all. Failure to acknowledge how, when, and on whose initiative philosophy came to occupy a very important place in Western culture and education for two and a half millennia; not including a note on this process in biographies of Plato; and overlooking another key event that probably occurred about 350-45 BC - these are just some of the unwelcome effects linked to the usual silence about the period in which philosophy took form.
id UNB-18_a88d5f1c64506e5b094f46d74c541dd6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8604
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling History and Prehistory of Philosophy:: Some Key DatesPhilosophyHistory of PhilosophyPresocraticsThalesGorgiasHippiasSocratesPlatoAristotlePhilosophy is often taken to be something that is always possible, so that everyone is fully entitled (and no one can avoid) sketching a ‘philosophy’ of his/her own. Nevertheless, it is widely assumed that philosophy began in Miletus with Thales. But it is equally well known that the Presocratics remained unaware of being philosophers, and therefore could not even have wanted to be identified that way. These three points are not mutually compatible. So, what lies behind them? What is escaping our attention when we state them? Probably an event in Plato’s life that has too often gone unnoticed: the key role he played in giving form and substance to philosophy, and in getting it to take root once and for all. Failure to acknowledge how, when, and on whose initiative philosophy came to occupy a very important place in Western culture and education for two and a half millennia; not including a note on this process in biographies of Plato; and overlooking another key event that probably occurred about 350-45 BC - these are just some of the unwelcome effects linked to the usual silence about the period in which philosophy took form.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2015-07-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/860410.14195/1984-249X_15_1Revista Archai; Vol. 15 No. 15 (2015): Revista Archai nº15 (julho, 2015); 11Archai Journal; v. 15 n. 15 (2015): Revista Archai nº15 (julho, 2015); 111984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_15reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8604/7163Rossetti, Livioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-06-07T15:54:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8604Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2018-06-07T15:54:22Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv History and Prehistory of Philosophy:: Some Key Dates
title History and Prehistory of Philosophy:: Some Key Dates
spellingShingle History and Prehistory of Philosophy:: Some Key Dates
Rossetti, Livio
Philosophy
History of Philosophy
Presocratics
Thales
Gorgias
Hippias
Socrates
Plato
Aristotle
title_short History and Prehistory of Philosophy:: Some Key Dates
title_full History and Prehistory of Philosophy:: Some Key Dates
title_fullStr History and Prehistory of Philosophy:: Some Key Dates
title_full_unstemmed History and Prehistory of Philosophy:: Some Key Dates
title_sort History and Prehistory of Philosophy:: Some Key Dates
author Rossetti, Livio
author_facet Rossetti, Livio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rossetti, Livio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Philosophy
History of Philosophy
Presocratics
Thales
Gorgias
Hippias
Socrates
Plato
Aristotle
topic Philosophy
History of Philosophy
Presocratics
Thales
Gorgias
Hippias
Socrates
Plato
Aristotle
description Philosophy is often taken to be something that is always possible, so that everyone is fully entitled (and no one can avoid) sketching a ‘philosophy’ of his/her own. Nevertheless, it is widely assumed that philosophy began in Miletus with Thales. But it is equally well known that the Presocratics remained unaware of being philosophers, and therefore could not even have wanted to be identified that way. These three points are not mutually compatible. So, what lies behind them? What is escaping our attention when we state them? Probably an event in Plato’s life that has too often gone unnoticed: the key role he played in giving form and substance to philosophy, and in getting it to take root once and for all. Failure to acknowledge how, when, and on whose initiative philosophy came to occupy a very important place in Western culture and education for two and a half millennia; not including a note on this process in biographies of Plato; and overlooking another key event that probably occurred about 350-45 BC - these are just some of the unwelcome effects linked to the usual silence about the period in which philosophy took form.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-07-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articles
Artigos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8604
10.14195/1984-249X_15_1
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8604
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_15_1
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8604/7163
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; Vol. 15 No. 15 (2015): Revista Archai nº15 (julho, 2015); 11
Archai Journal; v. 15 n. 15 (2015): Revista Archai nº15 (julho, 2015); 11
1984-249X
2179-4960
10.14195/1984-249X_15
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319944446771200