Who breathes and smells according to Empedocles? On the παντα of fr. 96. 1 Gallavotti

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Piergiacomi, Enrico
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8765
Resumo: Aristotle (Resp. 473a-474a), Theophrastus (Sens. 9 and 20-22) and Demetrius of Laco (PHerc. 1012, col. 65) preserve Empedocles’ extensive account in verses of the mechanism of breathing and smell. However, this explanation does not explicitly say how many living beings actually possess such a faculty. Empedocles just begins his account with the claim that “everyone” (πάντα) breathes and smells, which is an ambiguous claim. It could mean both that every living being can inhale air and odor, or that only all those living beings whose respiratory organs are structured as outlined in Empedocles’ verses can do so. I will argue in favor of the first hypothesis, by studying Empedocles’ usus scribendi and his use of the word πάντα in other contexts. After this, I will try to defend the possibility that Empedocles’ knowledge of the mechanism of breathing and smell may have been used: 1) to heal men and women, 2) to claim that all living beings are akin, since they inhale the same air, 3) to experience the divine through some special olfactory experiences.
id UNB-18_b6076902477bc581df11db4b185a7b1a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8765
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Who breathes and smells according to Empedocles? On the παντα of fr. 96. 1 GallavottiChi respira e odora secondo Empedocle? Sul παντα del fr. 96. 1 GallavottiEmpedoclesTheory of respirationHistory of medicineEthicsTheologyEmpedocleTeoria della respirazioneStoria della medicinaEticaTeologiaAristotle (Resp. 473a-474a), Theophrastus (Sens. 9 and 20-22) and Demetrius of Laco (PHerc. 1012, col. 65) preserve Empedocles’ extensive account in verses of the mechanism of breathing and smell. However, this explanation does not explicitly say how many living beings actually possess such a faculty. Empedocles just begins his account with the claim that “everyone” (πάντα) breathes and smells, which is an ambiguous claim. It could mean both that every living being can inhale air and odor, or that only all those living beings whose respiratory organs are structured as outlined in Empedocles’ verses can do so. I will argue in favor of the first hypothesis, by studying Empedocles’ usus scribendi and his use of the word πάντα in other contexts. After this, I will try to defend the possibility that Empedocles’ knowledge of the mechanism of breathing and smell may have been used: 1) to heal men and women, 2) to claim that all living beings are akin, since they inhale the same air, 3) to experience the divine through some special olfactory experiences.Aristotele (Resp. 473a-474a), Teofrasto (Sens. 9 e 20-22) e Demetrio Lacone (PHerc. 1012, col. 65) hanno conservato l’ampio resoconto in versi del meccanismo della respirazione e dell’olfatto di Empedocle. Tale spiegazione non dichiara però esplicitamente quanti viventi possiedono una simile facoltà. Empedocle si limita a cominciare il suo resoconto dichiarando che “tutti” (πάντα) respirano e odorano, che è una dichiarazione ambigua. Infatti, essa può indicare tanto che tutti i viventi in senso lato possono aspirare aria e odore, quanto che possono farlo solo tutti quei viventi il cui organismo opera mediante il meccanismo descritto dai versi empedoclei. Argomenterò a favore della prima ipotesi, studiando l’usus scribendi di Empedocle e il suo ricorso alla parola πάντα in altri contesti. Dopodiché, cercherò di difendere la possibilità che la conoscenza del meccanismo della respirazione e dell’olfatto potesse essere stata usata da Empedocle: 1) per curare gli uomini e le donne, 2) per affermare che tutti i viventi sono simili, perché inspirano la medesima aria, 3) per conoscere il divino attraverso alcune particolari esperienze olfattive.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2018-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/876510.14195/1984-249X_23_5Revista Archai; No. 23 (2018): Archai Journal nº23 (May, 2018); 135Archai Journal; n. 23 (2018): Revista Archai nº23 (maio, 2018); 1351984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_23reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8765/7500Piergiacomi, Enricoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-08-19T15:34:27Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8765Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2019-08-19T15:34:27Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Who breathes and smells according to Empedocles? On the παντα of fr. 96. 1 Gallavotti
Chi respira e odora secondo Empedocle? Sul παντα del fr. 96. 1 Gallavotti
title Who breathes and smells according to Empedocles? On the παντα of fr. 96. 1 Gallavotti
spellingShingle Who breathes and smells according to Empedocles? On the παντα of fr. 96. 1 Gallavotti
Piergiacomi, Enrico
Empedocles
Theory of respiration
History of medicine
Ethics
Theology
Empedocle
Teoria della respirazione
Storia della medicina
Etica
Teologia
title_short Who breathes and smells according to Empedocles? On the παντα of fr. 96. 1 Gallavotti
title_full Who breathes and smells according to Empedocles? On the παντα of fr. 96. 1 Gallavotti
title_fullStr Who breathes and smells according to Empedocles? On the παντα of fr. 96. 1 Gallavotti
title_full_unstemmed Who breathes and smells according to Empedocles? On the παντα of fr. 96. 1 Gallavotti
title_sort Who breathes and smells according to Empedocles? On the παντα of fr. 96. 1 Gallavotti
author Piergiacomi, Enrico
author_facet Piergiacomi, Enrico
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Piergiacomi, Enrico
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Empedocles
Theory of respiration
History of medicine
Ethics
Theology
Empedocle
Teoria della respirazione
Storia della medicina
Etica
Teologia
topic Empedocles
Theory of respiration
History of medicine
Ethics
Theology
Empedocle
Teoria della respirazione
Storia della medicina
Etica
Teologia
description Aristotle (Resp. 473a-474a), Theophrastus (Sens. 9 and 20-22) and Demetrius of Laco (PHerc. 1012, col. 65) preserve Empedocles’ extensive account in verses of the mechanism of breathing and smell. However, this explanation does not explicitly say how many living beings actually possess such a faculty. Empedocles just begins his account with the claim that “everyone” (πάντα) breathes and smells, which is an ambiguous claim. It could mean both that every living being can inhale air and odor, or that only all those living beings whose respiratory organs are structured as outlined in Empedocles’ verses can do so. I will argue in favor of the first hypothesis, by studying Empedocles’ usus scribendi and his use of the word πάντα in other contexts. After this, I will try to defend the possibility that Empedocles’ knowledge of the mechanism of breathing and smell may have been used: 1) to heal men and women, 2) to claim that all living beings are akin, since they inhale the same air, 3) to experience the divine through some special olfactory experiences.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articles
Artigos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8765
10.14195/1984-249X_23_5
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8765
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_23_5
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8765/7500
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 23 (2018): Archai Journal nº23 (May, 2018); 135
Archai Journal; n. 23 (2018): Revista Archai nº23 (maio, 2018); 135
1984-249X
2179-4960
10.14195/1984-249X_23
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319944930164736