Aristotle’s exegesis of Parm. 28B16DK
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Revista Archai (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48050 |
Resumo: | The starting point for this study is the passage in Metaphysics, in which Aristotle quotes Parmenides’ fr. 28B 16 DK, which is analyzed in the light of other parallel passages within the Corpus Aristotelicum, as well as through the confrontation with Theophrastus’ comment in the De Sensibuson this same Parmenides' fragment, in order to attempt, through an exhaustive lexical and semantic examination, a reconstruction of the interpretation that the Stagirite provided for Parmenides' approach to certain psychic functions (sensory perception and / or cognition). In line with this analysis, we will also try to assess the objectivity of the critique that Aristotle addressed to the philosophical views contained in Parmenides’ poem. |
id |
UNB-18_bdad0bca726d0e5df8df9b08df304905 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48050 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-18 |
network_name_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Aristotle’s exegesis of Parm. 28B16DKExégesis de Parm. 28B16DK en AristótelesParmenidesAristotleTheophrastussensory perception and cognitionParménidesAristótelesTeofrastoPercepción sensorial y cogniciónThe starting point for this study is the passage in Metaphysics, in which Aristotle quotes Parmenides’ fr. 28B 16 DK, which is analyzed in the light of other parallel passages within the Corpus Aristotelicum, as well as through the confrontation with Theophrastus’ comment in the De Sensibuson this same Parmenides' fragment, in order to attempt, through an exhaustive lexical and semantic examination, a reconstruction of the interpretation that the Stagirite provided for Parmenides' approach to certain psychic functions (sensory perception and / or cognition). In line with this analysis, we will also try to assess the objectivity of the critique that Aristotle addressed to the philosophical views contained in Parmenides’ poem. El presente trabajo toma como punto de partida el contexto de la Metafísicaen el que Aristóteles cita el fr. 28B 16 DK de Parménides, el cual es analizado a la luz de otros pasajes paralelos dentro del Corpus Aristotelicum, así como de la confrontación con el comentario que Teofrasto hace de ese mismo fragmentoparmenídeo en el De Sensibus, con la finalidad de presentar,con base en un exhaustivo examen léxico y semántico, unareconstrucción de la interpretación que el Estagirita dio alos planteamientos parmenídeos relativos a ciertas funciones psíquicas (percepción sensorial y/o cognición).En consonancia con este análisis, hemos intentado también hacer una valoración acerca de la objetividad de la crítica de Aristóteles hacialos planteamientos filosóficos vertidos en el poema de Parménides. Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2022-06-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/4805010.14195/1984-249X_32_18Revista Archai; No. 32 (2022): Archai 32 (2022); e03218Archai Journal; n. 32 (2022): Archai 32 (2022); e032181984-249X2179-4960reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBspahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48050/36725Copyright (c) 2022 Nazyheli Aguirre De la Luzhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAguirre De la Luz, Nazyheli2023-04-18T15:51:27Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48050Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2023-04-18T15:51:27Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Aristotle’s exegesis of Parm. 28B16DK Exégesis de Parm. 28B16DK en Aristóteles |
title |
Aristotle’s exegesis of Parm. 28B16DK |
spellingShingle |
Aristotle’s exegesis of Parm. 28B16DK Aguirre De la Luz, Nazyheli Parmenides Aristotle Theophrastus sensory perception and cognition Parménides Aristóteles Teofrasto Percepción sensorial y cognición |
title_short |
Aristotle’s exegesis of Parm. 28B16DK |
title_full |
Aristotle’s exegesis of Parm. 28B16DK |
title_fullStr |
Aristotle’s exegesis of Parm. 28B16DK |
title_full_unstemmed |
Aristotle’s exegesis of Parm. 28B16DK |
title_sort |
Aristotle’s exegesis of Parm. 28B16DK |
author |
Aguirre De la Luz, Nazyheli |
author_facet |
Aguirre De la Luz, Nazyheli |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aguirre De la Luz, Nazyheli |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Parmenides Aristotle Theophrastus sensory perception and cognition Parménides Aristóteles Teofrasto Percepción sensorial y cognición |
topic |
Parmenides Aristotle Theophrastus sensory perception and cognition Parménides Aristóteles Teofrasto Percepción sensorial y cognición |
description |
The starting point for this study is the passage in Metaphysics, in which Aristotle quotes Parmenides’ fr. 28B 16 DK, which is analyzed in the light of other parallel passages within the Corpus Aristotelicum, as well as through the confrontation with Theophrastus’ comment in the De Sensibuson this same Parmenides' fragment, in order to attempt, through an exhaustive lexical and semantic examination, a reconstruction of the interpretation that the Stagirite provided for Parmenides' approach to certain psychic functions (sensory perception and / or cognition). In line with this analysis, we will also try to assess the objectivity of the critique that Aristotle addressed to the philosophical views contained in Parmenides’ poem. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articles Artigos |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48050 10.14195/1984-249X_32_18 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48050 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14195/1984-249X_32_18 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/48050/36725 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Nazyheli Aguirre De la Luz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Nazyheli Aguirre De la Luz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai; No. 32 (2022): Archai 32 (2022); e03218 Archai Journal; n. 32 (2022): Archai 32 (2022); e03218 1984-249X 2179-4960 reponame:Revista Archai (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
collection |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br |
_version_ |
1798319942874955776 |