The JBS Corruption Scandals in Brazil and Lindblom’s Organizational Legitimacy Strategies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Pablinne de Paula
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, Fernanda Fernandes, Guerra, Mariana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
Texto Completo: https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/2068
Resumo: Objective: Evaluate the narrative financial reports released by the Brazilian meatpacker JBS SA and identify how the company has sought to influence its information user while coping with its recent corruption scandals.  Method: A qualitative analysis of narrative financial reports – Market Notices, Material Facts, Management Report, and Reference Form and Prospects – was carried out for the base year 2017 based on the Legitimacy Theory (Lindblom, 1994).Originality/Relevance: Parameters are shown that could be used by managers, separately or concurrently, intentionally or unintentionally, to achieve, preserve or recover the company’s legitimacy. Mechanisms of manipulation are also shown as used in corporate reports.Results: JBS used Lindblom’s (1994) first legitimacy strategy in all reports, but more frequently in the Material Facts. Such a strategy was used for regulatory and penal reasons (i.e., the Securities and Exchange Commission of Brazil, and the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office) as JBS acknowledged the impact of the negative event (i.e., the corruption scandals covered by the media) and provided information related to how it has addressed such a legitimacy-threatening problem.Theoretical/Methodological contributions: Lindblom’s (1994) 2nd and 3rd legitimacy strategies were not as frequent (9% and 12,5% respectively) as reported in the literature. Adding to the literature, this study provides a better understanding of financial reporting as an instrument of legitimacy and manipulation within the political and economic environment.
id UNB-21_bd9f7c80f53f2f31b0ba011bf8055ad6
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/2068
network_acronym_str UNB-21
network_name_str Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
repository_id_str
spelling The JBS Corruption Scandals in Brazil and Lindblom’s Organizational Legitimacy StrategiesOs Escândalos De Corrupção Na JBS S.A. E As Estratégias De Legitimidade Organizacional De LindblomLegitimacyStrategiesReportingLindblomJBS.LegitimidadeEstratégiasEvidenciaçãoLindblomJBSObjective: Evaluate the narrative financial reports released by the Brazilian meatpacker JBS SA and identify how the company has sought to influence its information user while coping with its recent corruption scandals.  Method: A qualitative analysis of narrative financial reports – Market Notices, Material Facts, Management Report, and Reference Form and Prospects – was carried out for the base year 2017 based on the Legitimacy Theory (Lindblom, 1994).Originality/Relevance: Parameters are shown that could be used by managers, separately or concurrently, intentionally or unintentionally, to achieve, preserve or recover the company’s legitimacy. Mechanisms of manipulation are also shown as used in corporate reports.Results: JBS used Lindblom’s (1994) first legitimacy strategy in all reports, but more frequently in the Material Facts. Such a strategy was used for regulatory and penal reasons (i.e., the Securities and Exchange Commission of Brazil, and the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office) as JBS acknowledged the impact of the negative event (i.e., the corruption scandals covered by the media) and provided information related to how it has addressed such a legitimacy-threatening problem.Theoretical/Methodological contributions: Lindblom’s (1994) 2nd and 3rd legitimacy strategies were not as frequent (9% and 12,5% respectively) as reported in the literature. Adding to the literature, this study provides a better understanding of financial reporting as an instrument of legitimacy and manipulation within the political and economic environment.Objetivo: Avaliar os relatórios financeiros narrativos da JBS S.A. e identificar como a empresa tem buscado influenciar o usuário da informação frente aos recentes escândalos de corrupção nos quais está envolvida.Método: Com base na Teoria da Legitimidade, realizou-se uma análise qualitativa dos relatórios financeiros narrativos – Comunicados ao Mercado, Fatos Relevantes, Relatório da Administração e Formulário de Referência e Prospectos – para o ano-base 2017, a partir das estratégias de legitimidade propostas por Lindblom (1994).Relevância: Definir parâmetros que poderiam ser usados pelos gestores, isoladamente ou em conjunto, intencionalmente ou não, buscando alcançar, preservar ou recuperar a legitimidade da JBS S.A. Verificar, na evidenciação corporativa, os mecanismos de manipulação da sociedade em geral.Resultados: Identificada em todos os relatórios analisados, mas com maior frequência no relatório Fatos Relevantes,  a JBS S.A. utilizou a 1ª estratégia de legitimidade de Lindblom (1994) por força regulatória e penal (i.e., CVM e Ministério Público Federal), quando reconheceu a influência gerada pelo evento negativo (i.e., os escândalos de corrupção divulgados na mídia) e apresentou informações pertinentes à solução o problema que ameaça sua legitimidade. Tal intenção não deliberativa, mas compulsória de a empresa se mostrar alinhada com os valores sociais, mesmo em momento de crises, corrobora os achados de Archel et al. (2009).Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: Verificou-se pouca frequência das 2ª e 3ª estratégias de legitimidade de Lindblom (1994), contrariando estudos que identificaram a preponderância de ambas, tais como Sancovschi e Silva (2006) e Beuren e Boff (2008). Somando a literatura pré-existente, o presente estudo pode auxiliar no entendimento do ambiente político-econômico no qual a divulgação financeira parece representar um forte instrumento de legitimação.Contabilidade Gestão e Governança2020-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/206810.51341/1984-3925_2020v23n3a2Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 23 n. 3 (2020); 309-3261984-39251984-3925reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governançainstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBengporhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/2068/PDF_Enhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/2068/PDF_PtCopyright (c) 2020 Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governançainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Pablinne de PaulaRodrigues, Fernanda FernandesGuerra, Mariana2022-09-22T08:50:22Zoai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/2068Revistahttp://www.revistacgg.org/index.php/contabilPUBhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/oaijamg.cgg@gmail.com1516-70111984-3925opendoar:2022-09-22T08:50:22Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The JBS Corruption Scandals in Brazil and Lindblom’s Organizational Legitimacy Strategies
Os Escândalos De Corrupção Na JBS S.A. E As Estratégias De Legitimidade Organizacional De Lindblom
title The JBS Corruption Scandals in Brazil and Lindblom’s Organizational Legitimacy Strategies
spellingShingle The JBS Corruption Scandals in Brazil and Lindblom’s Organizational Legitimacy Strategies
Oliveira, Pablinne de Paula
Legitimacy
Strategies
Reporting
Lindblom
JBS.
Legitimidade
Estratégias
Evidenciação
Lindblom
JBS
title_short The JBS Corruption Scandals in Brazil and Lindblom’s Organizational Legitimacy Strategies
title_full The JBS Corruption Scandals in Brazil and Lindblom’s Organizational Legitimacy Strategies
title_fullStr The JBS Corruption Scandals in Brazil and Lindblom’s Organizational Legitimacy Strategies
title_full_unstemmed The JBS Corruption Scandals in Brazil and Lindblom’s Organizational Legitimacy Strategies
title_sort The JBS Corruption Scandals in Brazil and Lindblom’s Organizational Legitimacy Strategies
author Oliveira, Pablinne de Paula
author_facet Oliveira, Pablinne de Paula
Rodrigues, Fernanda Fernandes
Guerra, Mariana
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, Fernanda Fernandes
Guerra, Mariana
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Pablinne de Paula
Rodrigues, Fernanda Fernandes
Guerra, Mariana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Legitimacy
Strategies
Reporting
Lindblom
JBS.
Legitimidade
Estratégias
Evidenciação
Lindblom
JBS
topic Legitimacy
Strategies
Reporting
Lindblom
JBS.
Legitimidade
Estratégias
Evidenciação
Lindblom
JBS
description Objective: Evaluate the narrative financial reports released by the Brazilian meatpacker JBS SA and identify how the company has sought to influence its information user while coping with its recent corruption scandals.  Method: A qualitative analysis of narrative financial reports – Market Notices, Material Facts, Management Report, and Reference Form and Prospects – was carried out for the base year 2017 based on the Legitimacy Theory (Lindblom, 1994).Originality/Relevance: Parameters are shown that could be used by managers, separately or concurrently, intentionally or unintentionally, to achieve, preserve or recover the company’s legitimacy. Mechanisms of manipulation are also shown as used in corporate reports.Results: JBS used Lindblom’s (1994) first legitimacy strategy in all reports, but more frequently in the Material Facts. Such a strategy was used for regulatory and penal reasons (i.e., the Securities and Exchange Commission of Brazil, and the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office) as JBS acknowledged the impact of the negative event (i.e., the corruption scandals covered by the media) and provided information related to how it has addressed such a legitimacy-threatening problem.Theoretical/Methodological contributions: Lindblom’s (1994) 2nd and 3rd legitimacy strategies were not as frequent (9% and 12,5% respectively) as reported in the literature. Adding to the literature, this study provides a better understanding of financial reporting as an instrument of legitimacy and manipulation within the political and economic environment.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/2068
10.51341/1984-3925_2020v23n3a2
url https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/2068
identifier_str_mv 10.51341/1984-3925_2020v23n3a2
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/2068/PDF_En
https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/2068/PDF_Pt
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Contabilidade Gestão e Governança
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Contabilidade Gestão e Governança
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 23 n. 3 (2020); 309-326
1984-3925
1984-3925
reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
collection Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
repository.name.fl_str_mv Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv jamg.cgg@gmail.com
_version_ 1798315268158521344