Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Direito.Unb (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522 |
Resumo: | Based on the judicial decisions collected fromsites of the courts of the Brazilian judicial system, we observe movements asking for changes in law with the inclusion and exclusion ofclaims by social movements, which allowed us to observe the adaptation of the law (communication system on licit/illicit) to its enviroment. These remarks were guided by Niklas Luhmann’s social theory (especially, the categories of recursiveness, auto and heterorreference, reflexive circularity, second order observation, heterarchy, autopoiesis). The researches carried out so far point that the reflexive perspective applied to legal decision offers distinct readings from those provided by legal interpretation, which increases the understanding of the legal decision. ------------------------------------ This Paper was supported by the CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil). I am grateful to Peter Malcolm Keays for helping in the English version. I really must thank Henrique Carvalho, André Barreto, Marcelle Penha and Camila Lopes for enlivening the debates which made this article possible, and also for contributing to research at the Moinho Jurídico. |
id |
UNB-24_ce8ac332c735eb73858952ae5392c6b3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24522 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-24 |
network_name_str |
Direito.Unb (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movementsTeoria reflexiva da decisão jurídica: direito, mudança social e movimentos sociaisDecisão jurídicamovimentos sociaisteoria dos sistemasdiscurso constituintemudança socialLegal decisionsocial movementsystems theorysocial changeself-constituting discourseBased on the judicial decisions collected fromsites of the courts of the Brazilian judicial system, we observe movements asking for changes in law with the inclusion and exclusion ofclaims by social movements, which allowed us to observe the adaptation of the law (communication system on licit/illicit) to its enviroment. These remarks were guided by Niklas Luhmann’s social theory (especially, the categories of recursiveness, auto and heterorreference, reflexive circularity, second order observation, heterarchy, autopoiesis). The researches carried out so far point that the reflexive perspective applied to legal decision offers distinct readings from those provided by legal interpretation, which increases the understanding of the legal decision. ------------------------------------ This Paper was supported by the CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil). I am grateful to Peter Malcolm Keays for helping in the English version. I really must thank Henrique Carvalho, André Barreto, Marcelle Penha and Camila Lopes for enlivening the debates which made this article possible, and also for contributing to research at the Moinho Jurídico.A partir de decisões judiciais coletadas em sites de tribunais do poderjudiciário brasileiro, observamos movimentos de mudança do direi-to com a inclusão e a exclusão de pleitos de movimentos sociais, o quenos permitiu observar a adaptação do direito (sistema de comunica-ção sobre lícito/ilícito) ao seu ambiente. As observações foram pautadas pela teoria da sociedade de Niklas Luhmann (em especial as categorias recursividade, auto e heterorreferência, circularidade reflexiva, observação de segunda ordem, heterarquia, autopoiesis). As pesquisas até aqui realizadas indicam que a perspectiva reflexiva aplicada à decisão jurídica oferece leituras distintas daquelas fornecidas pela hermenêutica jurídica e pela teoria da argumentação jurídica, o que amplia a compreensão da decisão jurídica ----------------------------------- Artigo realizado com apoio do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). Gostaria de agradecer Henrique Carvalho, André Barreto, Marcelle Penha e Camila Lopes por animar os debates que tornaram este Artigo possível e também por contribuir na pesquisa no Moinho Jurídico.FACULDADE DE DIREITO - UnB2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522Direito.UnB - Juristisches Journal der Universität Brasília; Bd. 2 Nr. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52Direito.UnB - Law Journal of the University of Brasília; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52Direito.UnB - Revista de Derecho de la Universidad de Brasília; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52Direito.UnB - Revue de Droit de l'Université de Brasília; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília; v. 2 n. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-522357-8009reponame:Direito.Unb (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522/21711https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522/21712Copyright (c) 2016 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasíliahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva, Artur Stamford2023-11-09T02:18:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24522Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/PUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/oairevistafdunb@gmail.com || periodicos.bce@unb.br2357-80092318-9908opendoar:2023-11-09T02:18:47Direito.Unb (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements Teoria reflexiva da decisão jurídica: direito, mudança social e movimentos sociais |
title |
Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements |
spellingShingle |
Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements da Silva, Artur Stamford Decisão jurídica movimentos sociais teoria dos sistemas discurso constituinte mudança social Legal decision social movement systems theory social change self-constituting discourse |
title_short |
Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements |
title_full |
Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements |
title_fullStr |
Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements |
title_sort |
Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements |
author |
da Silva, Artur Stamford |
author_facet |
da Silva, Artur Stamford |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Silva, Artur Stamford |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Decisão jurídica movimentos sociais teoria dos sistemas discurso constituinte mudança social Legal decision social movement systems theory social change self-constituting discourse |
topic |
Decisão jurídica movimentos sociais teoria dos sistemas discurso constituinte mudança social Legal decision social movement systems theory social change self-constituting discourse |
description |
Based on the judicial decisions collected fromsites of the courts of the Brazilian judicial system, we observe movements asking for changes in law with the inclusion and exclusion ofclaims by social movements, which allowed us to observe the adaptation of the law (communication system on licit/illicit) to its enviroment. These remarks were guided by Niklas Luhmann’s social theory (especially, the categories of recursiveness, auto and heterorreference, reflexive circularity, second order observation, heterarchy, autopoiesis). The researches carried out so far point that the reflexive perspective applied to legal decision offers distinct readings from those provided by legal interpretation, which increases the understanding of the legal decision. ------------------------------------ This Paper was supported by the CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil). I am grateful to Peter Malcolm Keays for helping in the English version. I really must thank Henrique Carvalho, André Barreto, Marcelle Penha and Camila Lopes for enlivening the debates which made this article possible, and also for contributing to research at the Moinho Jurídico. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522/21711 https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522/21712 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FACULDADE DE DIREITO - UnB |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FACULDADE DE DIREITO - UnB |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Direito.UnB - Juristisches Journal der Universität Brasília; Bd. 2 Nr. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52 Direito.UnB - Law Journal of the University of Brasília; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52 Direito.UnB - Revista de Derecho de la Universidad de Brasília; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52 Direito.UnB - Revue de Droit de l'Université de Brasília; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília; v. 2 n. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52 2357-8009 reponame:Direito.Unb (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Direito.Unb (Online) |
collection |
Direito.Unb (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Direito.Unb (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistafdunb@gmail.com || periodicos.bce@unb.br |
_version_ |
1796797431508107264 |