Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Silva, Artur Stamford
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Direito.Unb (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522
Resumo: Based on the judicial decisions collected fromsites of the courts of the Brazilian judicial system, we observe movements asking for changes in law with the inclusion and exclusion ofclaims by social movements, which allowed us to observe the adaptation of the law (communication system on licit/illicit) to its enviroment. These remarks were guided by Niklas Luhmann’s social theory (especially, the categories of recursiveness, auto and heterorreference, reflexive circularity, second order observation, heterarchy, autopoiesis). The researches carried out so far point that the reflexive perspective applied to legal decision offers distinct readings from those provided by legal interpretation, which increases the understanding of the legal decision. ------------------------------------ This Paper was supported by the CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil). I am grateful to Peter Malcolm Keays for helping in the English version. I really must thank Henrique Carvalho, André Barreto, Marcelle Penha and Camila Lopes for enlivening the debates which made this article possible, and also for contributing to research at the Moinho Jurídico.
id UNB-24_ce8ac332c735eb73858952ae5392c6b3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24522
network_acronym_str UNB-24
network_name_str Direito.Unb (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movementsTeoria reflexiva da decisão jurídica: direito, mudança social e movimentos sociaisDecisão jurídicamovimentos sociaisteoria dos sistemasdiscurso constituintemudança socialLegal decisionsocial movementsystems theorysocial changeself-constituting discourseBased on the judicial decisions collected fromsites of the courts of the Brazilian judicial system, we observe movements asking for changes in law with the inclusion and exclusion ofclaims by social movements, which allowed us to observe the adaptation of the law (communication system on licit/illicit) to its enviroment. These remarks were guided by Niklas Luhmann’s social theory (especially, the categories of recursiveness, auto and heterorreference, reflexive circularity, second order observation, heterarchy, autopoiesis). The researches carried out so far point that the reflexive perspective applied to legal decision offers distinct readings from those provided by legal interpretation, which increases the understanding of the legal decision. ------------------------------------ This Paper was supported by the CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil). I am grateful to Peter Malcolm Keays for helping in the English version. I really must thank Henrique Carvalho, André Barreto, Marcelle Penha and Camila Lopes for enlivening the debates which made this article possible, and also for contributing to research at the Moinho Jurídico.A partir de decisões judiciais coletadas em sites de tribunais do poderjudiciário brasileiro, observamos movimentos de mudança do direi-to com a inclusão e a exclusão de pleitos de movimentos sociais, o quenos permitiu observar a adaptação do direito (sistema de comunica-ção sobre lícito/ilícito) ao seu ambiente. As observações foram pautadas pela teoria da sociedade de Niklas Luhmann (em especial as categorias recursividade, auto e heterorreferência, circularidade reflexiva, observação de segunda ordem, heterarquia, autopoiesis). As pesquisas até aqui realizadas indicam que a perspectiva reflexiva aplicada à decisão jurídica oferece leituras distintas daquelas fornecidas pela hermenêutica jurídica e pela teoria da argumentação jurídica, o que amplia a compreensão da decisão jurídica ----------------------------------- Artigo realizado com apoio do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). Gostaria de agradecer Henrique Carvalho, André Barreto, Marcelle Penha e Camila Lopes por animar os debates que tornaram este Artigo possível e também por contribuir na pesquisa no Moinho Jurídico.FACULDADE DE DIREITO - UnB2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522Direito.UnB - Juristisches Journal der Universität Brasília; Bd. 2 Nr. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52Direito.UnB - Law Journal of the University of Brasília; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52Direito.UnB - Revista de Derecho de la Universidad de Brasília; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52Direito.UnB - Revue de Droit de l'Université de Brasília; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília; v. 2 n. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-522357-8009reponame:Direito.Unb (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522/21711https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522/21712Copyright (c) 2016 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasíliahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva, Artur Stamford2023-11-09T02:18:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24522Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/PUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/oairevistafdunb@gmail.com || periodicos.bce@unb.br2357-80092318-9908opendoar:2023-11-09T02:18:47Direito.Unb (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements
Teoria reflexiva da decisão jurídica: direito, mudança social e movimentos sociais
title Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements
spellingShingle Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements
da Silva, Artur Stamford
Decisão jurídica
movimentos sociais
teoria dos sistemas
discurso constituinte
mudança social
Legal decision
social movement
systems theory
social change
self-constituting discourse
title_short Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements
title_full Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements
title_fullStr Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements
title_full_unstemmed Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements
title_sort Reflective legal decision theory: law, social change and social movements
author da Silva, Artur Stamford
author_facet da Silva, Artur Stamford
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Silva, Artur Stamford
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Decisão jurídica
movimentos sociais
teoria dos sistemas
discurso constituinte
mudança social
Legal decision
social movement
systems theory
social change
self-constituting discourse
topic Decisão jurídica
movimentos sociais
teoria dos sistemas
discurso constituinte
mudança social
Legal decision
social movement
systems theory
social change
self-constituting discourse
description Based on the judicial decisions collected fromsites of the courts of the Brazilian judicial system, we observe movements asking for changes in law with the inclusion and exclusion ofclaims by social movements, which allowed us to observe the adaptation of the law (communication system on licit/illicit) to its enviroment. These remarks were guided by Niklas Luhmann’s social theory (especially, the categories of recursiveness, auto and heterorreference, reflexive circularity, second order observation, heterarchy, autopoiesis). The researches carried out so far point that the reflexive perspective applied to legal decision offers distinct readings from those provided by legal interpretation, which increases the understanding of the legal decision. ------------------------------------ This Paper was supported by the CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil). I am grateful to Peter Malcolm Keays for helping in the English version. I really must thank Henrique Carvalho, André Barreto, Marcelle Penha and Camila Lopes for enlivening the debates which made this article possible, and also for contributing to research at the Moinho Jurídico.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522/21711
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24522/21712
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FACULDADE DE DIREITO - UnB
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FACULDADE DE DIREITO - UnB
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Direito.UnB - Juristisches Journal der Universität Brasília; Bd. 2 Nr. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52
Direito.UnB - Law Journal of the University of Brasília; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52
Direito.UnB - Revista de Derecho de la Universidad de Brasília; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52
Direito.UnB - Revue de Droit de l'Université de Brasília; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52
Direito.UnB - Revista de Direito da Universidade de Brasília; v. 2 n. 1 (2016): Janeiro - Abril; 27-52
2357-8009
reponame:Direito.Unb (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Direito.Unb (Online)
collection Direito.Unb (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Direito.Unb (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistafdunb@gmail.com || periodicos.bce@unb.br
_version_ 1796797431508107264