Architecture, modern empty and social space

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cruz, Luciana Saboia Fonseca
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: P@ranoá
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11594
Resumo: Modern Movement’s vanguard promulgated free circulation and space within the nineteenth century urban fabric. Moderns believed in urban space built in conjunction with green areas, esplanades and areas for free movement would set a new urban and social order open to collective life. The Glassarchitektur characterized by few elements, slender structures and transparent walls, so called "reductionist modernist tradition" by Kenneth Frampton. This tectonic of minimum materiality became one of the aesthetic goals of early twentieth century modern architecture. Critics denounced modernism because the overly abstract spaces where there is no place for empirical event, for ornament or to the social fact leading to an impoverishment of cultural environment and 'emptying' the public sphere. How can one recognize the struggle for identity in designed and built urban space? How culturally recognize the modern or modernist without giving up collective memories and tradition? This paper aims to understand modernist void as spaces of experience, both as a urban phenomenon in continuous configuration and as a historical fact. We assume that social space is not an ideal or totalizing representations as modernists tenets preached. In a hermeneutical analysis of the void, the interpretation of memories and promises constinuously struggle for recognition in everyday life breaking with the idea of modern architecture as object, completed in its project design and construction.
id UNB-28_308ed5422ef03f6f9076c35d4ec1f254
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11594
network_acronym_str UNB-28
network_name_str P@ranoá
repository_id_str
spelling Architecture, modern empty and social spaceArquitetura, vazio moderno e o espaço socialArquitetura modernaVazioReconhecimento socialHermenêuticaProjetoModern architectureVoidSocial recognitionHermeneuticsDesign projectModern Movement’s vanguard promulgated free circulation and space within the nineteenth century urban fabric. Moderns believed in urban space built in conjunction with green areas, esplanades and areas for free movement would set a new urban and social order open to collective life. The Glassarchitektur characterized by few elements, slender structures and transparent walls, so called "reductionist modernist tradition" by Kenneth Frampton. This tectonic of minimum materiality became one of the aesthetic goals of early twentieth century modern architecture. Critics denounced modernism because the overly abstract spaces where there is no place for empirical event, for ornament or to the social fact leading to an impoverishment of cultural environment and 'emptying' the public sphere. How can one recognize the struggle for identity in designed and built urban space? How culturally recognize the modern or modernist without giving up collective memories and tradition? This paper aims to understand modernist void as spaces of experience, both as a urban phenomenon in continuous configuration and as a historical fact. We assume that social space is not an ideal or totalizing representations as modernists tenets preached. In a hermeneutical analysis of the void, the interpretation of memories and promises constinuously struggle for recognition in everyday life breaking with the idea of modern architecture as object, completed in its project design and construction.A vanguarda do Movimento Moderno promulgava a inserção de vazios urbanos no tecido urbano compacto da cidade do século XIX. Para os modernos, o espaço urbano edificado conjugado com áreas verdes, áreas amplas e áreas para livre circulação configuraria uma nova ordem social e um habitat social mais aberto ao convívio coletivo. A Glassarchitekture caracterizada por poucos elementos, estruturas esbeltas e vedações transparentes faziam parte principalmente do que Kenneth Frampton denominou de “tradição moderna minimalista”. Essa tectonicidade reduzida ao máximo tornaram-se objetivos estéticos da arquitetura moderna do início do século XX. Os críticos ao modernismo denunciavam os espaços demasiadamente abstratos, onde não há lugar para o acontecimento empírico, para o ornamento ou para o acaso levando a um empobrecimento do ambiente cultural e provocando um ‘esvaziamento’ da esfera pública. Como reconhecer a luta por identidades no espaço projetado e construído? Como reconhecer culturalmente o moderno ou o modernista sem abrir mão de memórias coletivas e tradições passadas? Pretende-se compreender a questão do vazio moderno como espaços de experiência, tanto como fenômenos em constante configuração, como na sua historicidade. Parte-se da premissa de que construções do espaço social não são representações ideais ou totalizantes como os modernistas pregavam. Em uma análise hermenêutica do vazio, a interpretação de memórias e promessas presentes na luta por reconhecimento no cotidiano da cidade planejada e vivenciada rompe com a ideia da arquitetura moderna como objeto original, finalizada na sua concepção e construção.Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo2016-08-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/1159410.18830/issn.1679-0944.n16.2016.04Paranoá; Vol. 9 No. 16 (2016): Poder e ManipulaçãoParanoá; v. 9 n. 16 (2016): Poder e Manipulação1679-09441677-7395reponame:P@ranoáinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11594/10208Cruz, Luciana Saboia Fonsecainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-07T13:29:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11594Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoaPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/oaiparanoa@unb.br1679-09441677-7395opendoar:2024-02-07T13:29:31P@ranoá - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Architecture, modern empty and social space
Arquitetura, vazio moderno e o espaço social
title Architecture, modern empty and social space
spellingShingle Architecture, modern empty and social space
Cruz, Luciana Saboia Fonseca
Arquitetura moderna
Vazio
Reconhecimento social
Hermenêutica
Projeto
Modern architecture
Void
Social recognition
Hermeneutics
Design project
title_short Architecture, modern empty and social space
title_full Architecture, modern empty and social space
title_fullStr Architecture, modern empty and social space
title_full_unstemmed Architecture, modern empty and social space
title_sort Architecture, modern empty and social space
author Cruz, Luciana Saboia Fonseca
author_facet Cruz, Luciana Saboia Fonseca
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cruz, Luciana Saboia Fonseca
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arquitetura moderna
Vazio
Reconhecimento social
Hermenêutica
Projeto
Modern architecture
Void
Social recognition
Hermeneutics
Design project
topic Arquitetura moderna
Vazio
Reconhecimento social
Hermenêutica
Projeto
Modern architecture
Void
Social recognition
Hermeneutics
Design project
description Modern Movement’s vanguard promulgated free circulation and space within the nineteenth century urban fabric. Moderns believed in urban space built in conjunction with green areas, esplanades and areas for free movement would set a new urban and social order open to collective life. The Glassarchitektur characterized by few elements, slender structures and transparent walls, so called "reductionist modernist tradition" by Kenneth Frampton. This tectonic of minimum materiality became one of the aesthetic goals of early twentieth century modern architecture. Critics denounced modernism because the overly abstract spaces where there is no place for empirical event, for ornament or to the social fact leading to an impoverishment of cultural environment and 'emptying' the public sphere. How can one recognize the struggle for identity in designed and built urban space? How culturally recognize the modern or modernist without giving up collective memories and tradition? This paper aims to understand modernist void as spaces of experience, both as a urban phenomenon in continuous configuration and as a historical fact. We assume that social space is not an ideal or totalizing representations as modernists tenets preached. In a hermeneutical analysis of the void, the interpretation of memories and promises constinuously struggle for recognition in everyday life breaking with the idea of modern architecture as object, completed in its project design and construction.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11594
10.18830/issn.1679-0944.n16.2016.04
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11594
identifier_str_mv 10.18830/issn.1679-0944.n16.2016.04
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11594/10208
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Paranoá; Vol. 9 No. 16 (2016): Poder e Manipulação
Paranoá; v. 9 n. 16 (2016): Poder e Manipulação
1679-0944
1677-7395
reponame:P@ranoá
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str P@ranoá
collection P@ranoá
repository.name.fl_str_mv P@ranoá - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv paranoa@unb.br
_version_ 1797066979082764288